Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp.98–123

Neural correlates of second language acquisition of tone-grammar associations

 | Lund University
 | Lund University
 | Lund University
 | Lund University
Native speakers of Swedish use tones on stems to predict which suffix is to follow. This is seen behaviorally in reduced response times for matching tone-suffix pairs. Neurophysiologically, online prediction is reflected in the event-related potential (ERP) component pre-activation negativity (PrAN) occurring for tones with a higher predictive value. Invalid suffixes relative to the tone produce a left anterior negativity (LAN), or a broadly distributed negativity, and a P600. When native speakers make decisions about the inflection of words, response times are also longer for invalid tone-suffix combinations. In this study, low to intermediate level second language learners with non-tonal native languages trained tone-suffix associations for two weeks. Before and after training, they participated in a perception test where they listened to nouns with valid and invalid tone-suffix combinations and performed a singular/plural judgment task. During the test, electroencephalography (EEG) and response times were measured. After training, the PrAN effect increased, and a LAN emerged for invalid stimuli, indicating that the participants had acquired the tone-suffix association, using the tones as predictors more extensively post-training. However, neither a P600 nor longer response times for invalidity were found, suggesting potential differences in native and second language processing of the tone-suffix association.
Keywords: second language acquisition, ERP, PrAN, LAN, prosody, morphology
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Prediction in language
    • Tone and morphosyntactic prediction
    • Second language acquisition of morphosyntax
    • Second language acquisition of tone
    • The present study
  • Materials and method
    • Participants
    • Training phase
      • Stimuli
      • Procedure
    • Pre- and post-training test
      • Stimuli
      • Procedure
  • Results
    • Training phase
    • Pre- and post-training test
      • Behavioral data
      • ERP data
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 11 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.17018.hed
References (67)
References
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 381, 419–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breen, M., Dilley, L. C., McAuley, J. D., & Sanders, L. D. (2014). Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 291, 1132–1146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruce, G. (1977). Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Bruce, G., & Gårding, E. (1978). A prosodic typology for Swedish dialects. In E. Gårding, G. Bruce, & R. Bannert (Eds.), Nordic Prosody (pp. 219–228). Lund: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(1), 21–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Natural Neuroscience, 81, 1117–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dikker, S., & Pylkkänen, L. (2013). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language, 1271, 55–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dufour, S., Brunellière, A., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2013). Tracking the time course of word-frequency effects in auditory word recognition with event-related potentials. Cognitive Science, 371, 489–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ejerhed, E., Källgren, G., Wennstedt, O., & Åström, M. (1992). The linguistic annotation system of the Stockholm-Umeå Corpus project. Technical Report 33. Umeå: Department of General Linguistics, Umeå University.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Ruiz-Tada, E., & Costa, A. (2015). How do you know I was about to say “book”? Anticipation processes affect speech processing and lexical recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 301, 768–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 361, 268–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagnepain, P., Henson, R. N., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Temporal predictive codes for spoken words in auditory cortex. Current Biology, 221, 615–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gosselke Berthelsen, S., Horne, M., Brännström, J., Shtyrov, Y., & Roll, M. (2018). Neural processing of morphosyntactic tonal cues in second-language learners. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 451, 60–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, M., Say, T., Kleingers, M., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (1998). Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words. Neuroscience Letters, 2411, 83–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 556–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2016). Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 321, 277–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunter, C. R. (2013). Early effects of neighborhood density and phonotactic probability of spoken words on event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 1271, 463–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V., Sejnowski, T. J. 2000. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 371, 163–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 41, 257–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Wayland, R., Bao, M., & Barkley, C. M. (2007). Effects of native language and training on lexical tone perception: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 11481, 113–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, R. (2011). Do Germans produce and perceive the Swedish word accent contrast? A cross-language analysis. TMH-QPSR, 51, 51, 93–96.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2003). How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(3), 213–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, M., Niska, H., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M. (2006). Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 121–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, M., Vorobyev, V., Soveri, A., Hugdahl, K., Tuokkolae, T., & Laine, M. (2009). Language-specific activations in the brain: Evidence from inflectional processing in bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 221, 495–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, S., Wayland, R., Kaan, E. (2015). Effects of production training and perception training on lexical tone perception – A behavioral and ERP study. Brain Research, 16241, 28–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lück, M., Hahne, A., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Brain potentials to morphologically complex words during listening. Brain Research, 10771, 144–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, J., & Holcomb, P. (2005). Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English. Cognitive Brain Research, 251, 963–981. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, A. J., Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., & Neville, H. J. (2007). An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. Neuroimage, 34(1), 435–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. 2005. An ERPs study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 171, 1212–1228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 311, 785–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 739–773. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penke, M., Weyerts, H., Gross, M., Zander, E., Münte, T., & Clahsen, H. (1997). How the brain processes complex words: An event-related potential study of German verb inflections. Cognitive Brain Research, 61, 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 2531, 530–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2003). Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage, 201, 159–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regel, S., Kotz, S. A., Henseler, I., & Friederici, A. D. (2017). Left inferior frontal gyrus mediates morphosyntax: ERP evidence from verb processing in left-hemisphere damaged patients. Cortex, 861, 156–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riad, T. (2013). The phonology of Swedish. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Prosodin i svenskans morfologi. Stockholm: Morfem.Google Scholar
Righi, G., Blumstein, S. E., Mertus, J., & Worden, M. S. (2010). Neural systems underlying lexical competition: an eyetracking and fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 221, 213–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rischel, J.. (1963). Morphemic tone and word tone in Eastern Norwegian. Phonetica, 101, 154–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleó, C., Zaake, W., & Münte, T. F. (2001). Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(1), 47–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roll, M. (2015). A neurolinguistic study of South Swedish word accents: Electrical brain potentials in nouns and verbs. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 381, 149–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Horne, M., & Lindgren, M. (2010). Word accents and morphology – ERPs of Swedish word processing. Brain Research, 13301, 114–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Horne, M., & Söderström, P. (2013). Word-stem tones cue suffixes in the brain. Brain Research, 15201, 116–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Söderström, P., Frid, J., Mannfolk, P., & Horne, M. (2017). Forehearing words: Pre-activation of word endings at word onset. Neuroscience Letters, 6581, 57–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Söderström, P., Mannfolk, P., Shtyrov, Y., Johansson, M., van Westen, D., & Horne, M. (2015). Word tones cueing morphosyntactic structure: Neuroanatomical substrates and activation time-course assessed by EEG and fMRI. Brain and Language, 1501, 14–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. 2006. The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 181, 2030–2048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Söderström, P., Horne, M., & Roll, M. (2016). Implicit acquisition of tone-suffix connections in L2 learners of Swedish. The Mental Lexicon 11(1), 55–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Hed, A., Horne, M., & Roll, M. (2017). Training predictive L2 processing with a digital game: prototype promotes acquisition of anticipatory use of Swedish tone-suffix associations. Computers and Education, 1141, 206–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Novén, M., Horne, M., & Roll, M. (2019). Brain responses to morphologically complex verbs: An electrophysiological study of Swedish regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 511, 76–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Novén, M., Horne, M., Söderström, P., Westen, D. v., & Roll, M. (2018). Cortical thickness of planum temporale and pars opercularis in native language tone processing. Brain and Language, 1761, 42–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Roll, M., & Horne, M. (2012). Processing morphologically conditioned word accents. The Mental Lexicon, 7(1), 77–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Horne, M., Frid, J., & Roll, M. (2016). Pre-activation negativity (PrAN) in brain potentials to unfolding words. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 101, 512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Horne, M., & Roll, M. (2017a). Stem tones pre-activate suffixes in the brain. Journal of Psycholinguistic research, 46(2), 271–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Horne, M., Mannfolk, P., van Westen, D., & Roll, M. (2017b). Tone-grammar association within words: Concurrent ERP and fMRI show rapid neural pre-activation and involvement of left inferior frontal gyrus in pseudoword processing. Brain and Language, 1741, 119–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teleman, U., Hellberg, S., & Andersson, E. (1999). Svenska Akademiens grammatik. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.Google Scholar
Tronnier, M., & Zetterholm, E. (2013). Tendencies of Swedish word accent production by L2 Learners with tonal and non-tonal L1. In E. L. Asu & P. Lippus (Eds.), Nordic Prosody, Proceedings of the XIth Conference, Tartu 2012 (pp. 391–400).Google Scholar
van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Haagort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 311, 443–467.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, W., & Husby, O. (2009). Perception of Norwegian word tones by Chinese and German listeners. In M. A. Watkins, A. S. Rauber & B. O. Babtista (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production (pp. 308–321). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 261, 43–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 91, 325–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 401, 374–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., Sereno, J., & Hirsch, J. (2003). FMRI evidence for cortical modification during learning of Mandarin lexical tone. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 151, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: a preliminary report. Language Learning, 541, 681–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (1997). Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. Neuroreport, 8(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J., Segalowitz, N., & Leclair, T. (2014). Estimating second language productive vocabulary size. The Mental Lexicon, 9(1), 23–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Antonicelli, Giada & Stefano Rastelli
2023. Event-related potentials in the study of L2 sentence processing: A scoping review of the decade 2010-2020. Language Acquisition 30:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina, Nuria Sagarra & Joseph V. Casillas
2023. Interpreting experience and working memory effects on L1 and L2 morphological prediction. Frontiers in Language Sciences 1 DOI logo
Roll, Mikael, Pelle Söderström, Merle Horne & Anna Hjortdal
2023. Pre-activation negativity (PrAN): A neural index of predictive strength of phonological cues. Laboratory Phonology 14:1 DOI logo
Hjortdal, Anna, Johan Frid & Mikael Roll
2022. Phonetic and phonological cues to prediction: Neurophysiology of Danish stød. Journal of Phonetics 94 ► pp. 101178 ff. DOI logo
Roll, Mikael
2022. The predictive function of Swedish word accents. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Novén, Mikael, Andrea Schremm, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2021. Cortical thickness and surface area of left anterior temporal areas affects processing of phonological cues to morphosyntax. Brain Research 1750 ► pp. 147150 ff. DOI logo
Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2020. Different neural mechanisms for rapid acquisition of words with grammatical tone in learners from tonal and non-tonal backgrounds: ERP evidence. Brain Research 1729 ► pp. 146614 ff. DOI logo
Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2021. Phonological transfer effects in novice learners: A learner's brain detects grammar errors only if the language sounds familiar. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24:4 ► pp. 656 ff. DOI logo
Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2022. Native language experience shapes pre‐attentive foreign tone processing and guides rapid memory trace build‐up: An ERP study. Psychophysiology 59:8 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.