3017
Six years in the life of an ill-fated neologism
In this study we examined uses of the number 3017 as a neologism by members of an online forum. 3017 has a number
of factors working against its success as a neologism, but its use grew dramatically over the course of six years. Statistical
analyses showed that the growth data were very well modeled by both a quadratic and a sigmoid curve. The form was used primarily
as an adjective and to a lesser extent as a noun over the first 500 days, before verbal forms came to dominate. To understand the
structure of the 3017 concept in the mental lexicons of users, we examine attempts to define the term, and disagreements and
negotiations about what the term does and does not include. Finally, we include examples of users’ creativity and productivity
with the form, including readily-understood jokes.
Article outline
- Origin of 3017
- Can 3017 Survive?
- Data-gathering method
- Curve fitting
- Method
- Results
- Usage as part of speech
- Method
- Results
- Changes of meaning
- Goal/benefit: Stock reduction
- Goal/benefit: Getting to know a soap
- Disagreements about meaning
- Productivity/creativity: Humor and expansion beyond soaps
- General discussion
- Note
-
References