Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp.6997
Albright, A., & Hayes, B.
(2003) Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90(2), 119–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., Marcus, G., Shimron, J., & Gafos, A.
(2002) The scope of linguistic generalizations: Evidence from Hebrew word formation. Cognition, 83(2), 113–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., & Pinker, S.
Berent, I., Pinker, S., & Shimron, J.
(2002) The nature of regularity and irregularity: Evidence from Hebrew nominal inflection. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 459–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J.
(2016) Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2013) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.51).Google Scholar
Borg, A., & Azzopardi-Alexander, M.
(1997) Maltese. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bugeja, K. P.
(2017) Kelmet il-malti dictionary. TBWA.Google Scholar
Camilleri, J. J.
(2013) A computational grammar and lexicon for Maltese. [Master Thesis, University of Gothenburg]. [URL]
Clahsen, H.
(1999) Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 991–1060. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., & Marcus, G. F.
(1992) Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45(3), 225–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daelemans, W.
(2002) A comparison of analogical modeling to memory-based language processing. In R. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, & D. B. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling (pp. 157–179). Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawdy-Hesterberg, L. G., & Pierrehumbert, J. B.
(2014) Learnability and generalisation of Arabic broken plural nouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(10), 1268–1282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drake, S.
(2018a) The form and productivity of the Maltese morphological diminutive. Morphology, 281, 297–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018b) L1 biases in learning root-and-pattern morphology. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. [URL]
Draxler, C., & Jänsch, K.
(2004) SpeechRecorder – a Universal Platform Independent Multi-Channel Audio Recording Software. Proc. of LREC, 559–562.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C.
(1984) Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 101, 680–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R.
(1987) Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39(2), 211–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gatt, A., & Čéplö, S.
(2013) Digital corpora and other electronic resources for Maltese. In A. Hardie & R. Love (Eds.), Corpus linguistics (p. 96–97). Lancaster: UCREL.Google Scholar
Geary, J., & Ussishkin, A.
(2018) Root-letter priming in Maltese visual word recognition. The Mental Lexicon, 131, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J. B., & Baayen, H. R.
(2005) Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 342–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kielar, A., Joanisse, M. F., & Hare, M. L.
(2008) Priming English past tense verbs: Rules or statistics? Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., & Prasada, S.
(1991) Why no mere mortal has ever out to center field. Cognitive Science (15), 173–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
(2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lück, M., Hahne, A., & Clahsen, H.
(2006) Brain potentials to morphologically complex words during listening. Brain Research, 10771, 144–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S.
(1995) German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive psychology, 29(3), 189–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K.
(1998) Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(11), 428–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L.
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. S.
(1990) Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8(2), 209–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
(2004) Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(4), 561–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakisa, R., Plunkett, K., & Hahn, U.
(2001) Single-and dual-route models of inflectional morphology. In P. Broeder & J. Murre (Eds.), Models of language acquisition: Inductive and deductive approaches (pp. 201–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nieder, J., van de Vijver, R., & Mitterer, H.
(2020) Knowledge of Maltese singular-plural mappings. Analogy explains it best. Morphology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B.
(2002) Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological faciliation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(1), 244–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J., Gray, J., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … Lindelov, J.
(2019) PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behaviour Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1998) Words and rules. Lingua, 1061, 219–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A.
(1988) On language and connectionism: Analysis of parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28(1–2), 73–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, B., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K.
(2008) The processing of English regular inflections: Phonological cues to morphological structure. Cognition, 109(1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Royle, P., Beritognolo, G., & Bergeron, E.
(2012) Regularity, sub-regularity and irregularity in French acquisition. In T. Stolz, H. Otsuka, A. Urdze, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), Irregularity in morphology (and beyond) (p. 227). Akademie Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J.
(1986) On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, T.
(2012) The Broken Plural in Maltese: A Description. Univ.-Verl. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L.
(1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 961, 523–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & Plaut, D. C.
(2014) Quasiregularity and its discontents: The legacy of the past tense debate. Cognitive Science, 381, 1190–1228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skousen, R.
(1992) Analogy and structure. Springer Netherlands. 341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H.
(1999) Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 721, 203–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spagnol, M.
(2011) A Tale of Two Morphologies: Verb structure and argument alternations in Maltese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Konstanz]. [URL]
Twist, A. E.
(2006) A Psycholinguistic Investigation of the Verbal Morphology of Maltese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. [URL]
van de Vijver, R., & Baer-Henney, D.
(2014) Developing biases. Frontiers in Psychology – Section Language Sciences, 51, Article 634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Paradigms in the mental lexicon: Evidence from German. Frontiers in Communication, 31, 65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F.
(1997) Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. NeuroReport, 8(4), 957–962. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H.
(2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, S. C.
(2016) Decomposability and the effects of morpheme frequency in lexical access. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. [URL]