Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp.2348
Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B., & Schreuder, R.
(2006) Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 290–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P.
(2010) Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović Đurđević, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
(2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3), 438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
(2005) Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81(3), 666–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J.
(2000) Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74(2), B13–B25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. P.
(2003) Stems and paradigms. Language, 79(4), 737–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Box, G. E., & Cox, D. R.
(1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 261, 211–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J.
(1989) On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(1), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ek, U., Fellenius, K., & Jacobson, L.
(2003) Reading acquisition, cognitive and visual development, and self-esteem in four children with cerebral visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97(12), 741–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Cutler, A.
(2015) BALDEY: A database of auditory lexical decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1469–1488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Warner, N.
(2011) An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics, 39(SI), 253–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrand, L., Méot, A., Spinelli, E., New, B., Pallier, C., Bonin, P., Dufau, S., Mathôt, S., & Grainger, J.
(2018) MEGALEX: A megastudy of visual and auditory word recognition. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1285–1307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović Đurđević, D., & Gatarić, I.
(2018) Simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes in processing of Serbian verbs. Psihologija, 51(3), 259–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović Đurđević, D., & Milin, P.
(2019) Information and learning in processing adjective inflection. Cortex, 1161, 209–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goh, W. D., Yap, M. J., Lau, M. C., Ng, M. M., & Tan, L.-C.
(2016) Semantic richness effects in spoken word recognition: A lexical decision and semantic categorization megastudy. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 976. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldinger, S. D.
(1996) Auditory lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), 559–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gönczöl, R.
(2007) Romanian: An essential grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J. B., & Baayen, R. H.
(2005) Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 342–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, P., Bolger, P., & Baayen, H.
(2017) Distinct ERP signatures of word frequency, phrase frequency, and prototypicality in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(1), 128.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F.
(1954) Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10(2–3), 210–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemps, R., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H.
(2004) Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 117–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Balota, D. A.
(2015) Megastudies, crowdsourcing, and large datasets in psycholinguistics: An overview of recent developments. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1457–1468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kostić, A., Marković, T., & Baucal, A.
(2003) Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative cognitive domains? In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 1–44). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W.
(2011) Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 952.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B.
(1990) Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, S.-A., & Laine, M.
(2011) Multilingual dyslexia in university students: Reading and writing patterns in three languages. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(9), 753–766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorentzen, P., Nenadić, F., Kelley, M. C., & Tucker, B. V.
(2019) Massive auditory lexical decision: Investigating performance in noisy environments. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Mental Lexicon, 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnuson, J. S., Mirman, D., & Harris, H. D.
(2012) Computational models of spoken word recognition. In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & KenMcRae (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 76–103). Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
(2020) Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project. Behavior Research Methods, 521, 741–760. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milin, P., Filipović Ðurđević, D., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
(2009) The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 50–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, J., Porter, J. H., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J.
(2011) Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 558–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H.
(2004) Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94(1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M.
(2008) Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A.
(2000) Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 231, 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podlubny, R. G., Nearey, T. M., Kondrak, G., & Tucker, B. V.
(2018) Assessing the importance of several acoustic properties to the perception of spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(4), 2255–2268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J.
(2006) Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 241–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A.
(2002) E-Prime: User’s guide. Psychology Software Incorporated.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E.
(1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M.
(1979) Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 263–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tucker, B. V., Brenner, D., Danielson, D. K., Kelley, M. C., Nenadić, F., & Sims, M.
(2019) The massive auditory lexical decision (MALD) database. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1187–1204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tufiş, D., Ion, R., Ceauşu, A., & Ştefănescu, D.
(2008) RACAI’s Linguistic Web Services. Proceedings of the 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference – LREC, 28–30.Google Scholar
van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. H., & van Rijn, H.
(2017) itsadug: Interpreting Time Series and Autocorrelated Data Using GAMMs.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A.
(1998) When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9(4), 325–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Scharenborg, O.
(2012) Models of spoken-word recognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(3), 387–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westbury, C., Hollis, G., & Shaoul, C.
Wood, S. N.
(2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 73(1), 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G. B.
(2004) The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 452–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar