The impact of embodied simulation in vocabulary learning
The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the multisensory nature of vocabulary knowledge by using learning
designed to encourage the simulation of sensorimotor experiences.
Forty participants were instructed to learn pseudowords together with arbitrary definitions, either by mentally
experiencing (sensorimotor simulation) the definitions, or by mentally repeating them. A test phase consisting of three tasks was
then administered: in a recognition task, participants had to recognize learned pseudowords among distractors. In a categorization
task, they had to categorize pseudowords as representing either living or non-living items. Finally, in a sentence completion
task, participants had to decide whether pseudowords were congruent with context sentences. As expected, the sensorimotor
simulation condition induced better performances only in the categorization task and the sentence completion task. The results
converge with data from the literature in demonstrating that knowledge emergence implies sensorimotor simulation and showing that
vocabulary learning can benefit from encoding that encourages the simulation of sensorimotor experiences.
Article outline
- Method
- Participants
- Apparatus and material
- Procedure
- Test phase
- Recognition task
- Semantic categorization task
- Sentence completion task
- Results
- Recognition task
- Proportion of correct responses
- Response times
- Semantic categorization task
- Proportion of correct responses
- Response times
- Sentence completion task
- Proportion of correct responses
- Response times
- General discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Conflict of interest
-
References
References (65)
References
Anders, P., Bos, C., & Filip, D. (1984). The
effect of semantic feature analysis of the reading comprehension of learning-disabled
students. In J. A. Niles, & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Changing
perspectives on research in reading/language processing and instruction. National Reading Conference
Yearbook (Vol. 331) (pp. 162–166). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual
symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 22(04). 

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded
Cognition. Annual Review of
Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. 

Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding
conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 7(2), 84–91. 

Boronat, C. B., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Tang, K., Saffran, E. M., Kimberg, D. Y., & Detre, J. A. (2005). Distinctions
between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance
imaging. Cognitive Brain
Research, 23(2–3), 361–373. 

Bos, C. S., Anders, P. L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L. E. (1989). The
Effects of an Interactive Instructional Strategy for Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Content Area Learning for Students
with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 22(6), 384–390. 

Brouillet, D. (2020). Enactive memory. Frontiers in psychology, 111. 

Brouillet, D., Vagnot, C., Milhau, A., Brunel, L., Briglia, J., Versace, R., & Rousset, S. (2015). Sensory–motor
properties of past actions bias memory in a recognition task. Psychological
Research, 79(4), 678–686. 

Brouillet, T., Heurley, L., Martin, S., & Brouillet, D. (2010). The
embodied cognition theory and the motor component of “yes” and “no” verbal responses. Acta
Psychologica, 134(3), 310–317. 

Brouillet, D., & Versace, R. (2019). The nature of the traces and the dynamics of memory. Psychol. Behav. Sci, 81, 151–157. 

Brunel, L., Lesourd, M., Labeye, E., & Versace, R. (2010). The
sensory nature of knowledge: Sensory priming effects in semantic categorization. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 63(5), 955–964. 

Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2006). The
organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future’s past and some future
directions. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 23(1), 13–38. 

Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation
of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal
Stream. NeuroImage, 12(4), 478–484. 

Cohen, R. L. (1989). Memory
for action events: The power of enactment. Educational Psychology
Review, 1(1), 57–80. 

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A
spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological
Review, 82(6), 407–428. 

Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing
makes memories that last. Journal of Memory and
Language, 63(4), 465–475. 

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels
of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. 

Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth
of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental
Psychology:
General, 104(3), 268–294. 

Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance:
The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of
Psychology, 91(4), 451–471. 

Farah, M. J., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A
computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category
specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 120(4), 339–357. 

Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What
memory is for. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 20(01). 

Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic
Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor
Cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. 

Hintzman, D. L. (1984). Minerva 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16(2), 96–101. 

Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychol. Rev. 931, 411–428. 

Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528. 

Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor
Action Control: On the Perceptual Grounding of Voluntary Actions and
Agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Éd.), Action
Science (p. 112–136). 

Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The
Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and
Brain
Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. 

Horchak, O. V., Giger, J.-C., Cabral, M., & Pochwatko, G. (2014). From
demonstration to theory in embodied language comprehension: A review. Cognitive Systems
Research, 29–301, 66–85. 

James, W. (1890). The
principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover Publications.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On
the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of
Experimental Psychology:
General, 110(3), 306–340. 

Kormi-nouri, R. (1995). The
nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view. European Journal of Cognitive
Psychology, 7(4), 337–363. 

Kormi-Nouri, R., Nyberg, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1994). The
effect of retrieval enactment on recall of subject-performed tasks and verbal tasks. Memory
&
Cognition, 22(6), 723–728. 

Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. O. M., Wiggs, C. L., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Discrete
Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of
Action. Science, 270(5233), 102–105. 

Martin, Alex. (2007). The
Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain. Annual Review of
Psychology, 58(1), 25–45. 

Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Category
specificity and the brain: The sensory/motor model of semantic representations of
objects. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The
cognitive
neurosciences (pp. 839–847). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Martin, Alex, Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural
correlates of category-specific
knowledge. Nature, 379(6566), 649–652. 

New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique
2 : A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &
Computers, 36(3), 516–524. 

Nyberg, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1995). The
role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory. Psychological
Research, 57(3–4), 215–219. 

Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A
not-so-simple view of reading: how oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the
story. Reading and
Writing, 23(2), 189–208. 

Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s
meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading
comprehension. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. 

Prinz, W. (1997). Perception
and Action Planning. European Journal of Cognitive
Psychology, 9(2), 129–154. 

Protopapas, A., Mouzaki, A., Sideridis, G. D., Kotsolakou, A., & Simos, P. G. (2013). The
Role of Vocabulary in the Context of the Simple View of Reading. Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 29(2), 168–202. 

Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words
in the brain’s language. The Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 22(2), 253–279; discussion
280–336. 

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation
and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive
science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rey, A. E., Riou, B., Vallet, G. T., & Versace, R. (2017). The
automatic visual simulation of words: A memory reactivated mask slows down conceptual
access. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie
Expérimentale, 71(1), 14–22. 

Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures
of Memory. Annual Review of
Psychology, 39(1), 475–543. 

Sadoski, M. (2005). A
Dual Coding View of Vocabulary Learning. Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 21(3), 221–238. 

Sadoski, M. (2018). Reading
Comprehension is Embodied: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Educational Psychology
Review, 30(2), 331–349. 

Simmons, W. K., Ramjee, V., Beauchamp, M. S., McRae, K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W. (2007). A
common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about
color. Neuropsychologia, 45(12), 2802–2810. 

Slotnick, S. D. (2004). Visual
Memory and Visual Perception Recruit Common Neural Substrates. Behavioral and Cognitive
Neuroscience
Reviews, 3(4), 207–221. 

Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory
systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and
Memory, 82(3), 171–177. 

Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The
Effect of Implied Orientation Derived from Verbal Context on Picture Recognition. Psychological
Science, 12(2), 153–156. 

Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships
Between Word Knowledge and Reading Comprehension in Third-Grade Children. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 10(4), 381–398. 

Tulving, E. Organization
of memory: Quo vadis? In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. The cognitive
neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995: 839–47.
Versace, R., & Rose, M. (2007). The
role of emotion in multimodal integration. Current Psychology Letters, Behaviour, Brain &
Cognition, 211, 16–25. 

Versace, R., Labeye, É., Badard, G., & Rose, M. (2009). The
contents of long-term memory and the emergence of knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive
Psychology, 21(4), 522–560. 

Versace, R., Vallet, G. T., Riou, B., Lesourd, M., Labeye, É., & Brunel, L. (2014). Act-In:
An integrated view of memory mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive
Psychology, 26(3), 280–306. 

Vingerhoets, G. (2008). Knowing
about tools: Neural correlates of tool familiarity and
experience. NeuroImage, 40(3), 1380–1391. 

Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). CATEGORY
SPECIFIC SEMANTIC
IMPAIRMENTS. Brain, 107(3), 829–853. 

Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1987). Preservation of specific experiences in the representation of general knowledge. Cognition 131, 3–171.
Witt, J. K., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S. A., & Culham, J. (2010). A
Functional Role for Motor Simulation in Identifying Tools. Psychological
Science, 21(9), 1215–1219. 

Wu, L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Perceptual
simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta
Psychologica, 132(2), 173–189. 

Zwaan, R. A., and Kaschak, M. P. (2008). “Language
in the brain, body, and world,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Situated
Cognition, eds P. Robbins and M. Aydede (New York: Cambridge University Press), 368–381.
Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied
Sentence Comprehension. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Éd.), Grounding
Cognition (p. 224–245). 

Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language
Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects. Psychological
Science, 13(2), 168–171. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Jongbloed, Janine, Rawad Chaker & Elise Lavoué
2024.
Immersive procedural training in virtual reality: A systematic literature review.
Computers & Education 221
► pp. 105124 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.