Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:2/3 (2021) ► pp.240270
Allen, M., & Badecker, W.
(1999) Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, 41 1, 105–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D.
(2012) Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in psychology, 3 1, 232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amenta, S., Marelli, M., & Crepaldi, D.
(2015) The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41 1, 1587–1596.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 1, 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 1, 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J.
(2000) Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even for inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74 1, B13–B25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Harald, R.
(2000) The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 1, 489–511.Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A.
(2012) Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65 1, 1798–1819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E.
(2003) Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10 1, 645–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.
(2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5 1, e10729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. C., & Shu, H.
(2001) Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8 1, 511–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Goldberg, A. M., Cholin, J., Miozzo, M., & Rapp, B.
(2013) The interface between morphology and phonology: Exploring a morpho-phonological deficit in spoken production. Cognition, 127 1, 270–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K.
(2010) Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on Feldman, O’Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martin (2009). Psychonomic bulletin & review, 17 1, 749–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
(2005) Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20 1, 75–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M.
(2008) Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 1, 1002–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A. & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F.
(2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16 1, 684–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E.
(2009) Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. The Mental Lexicon, 4 1, 159–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
(2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35 1, 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A.
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23 1, 829–856.Google Scholar
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J.
(2001) Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8 1, 127–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S.
(2007) Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 1, 323–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyönä, J., Heikkilä, T., Vainio, S., & Kliegl, R.
(2021) Parafoveal access to word stem during reading: An eye movement study. Cognition, 208 1, 104547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyönä, J., Yan, M., & Vainio, S.
(2018) Morphological structure influences the initial landing position in words during reading Finnish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71 1, 122–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F.
(2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 1, 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H.
(2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software, 82 1, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K.
(2007) ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 1, 866–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leybaert, J., & Alegría, J.
(1995) Spelling development in deaf and hearing children: Evidence for use of morpho-phonological regularities in French. Reading and Writing, 7 1, 89–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A.
(2003) Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2003 1, 313–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luke, S. G.
(2017) Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49 1, 1494–1502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marelli, M., & Baroni, M.
(2015) Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122 1, 485–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L.
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101 1, 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D.
(2017) Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of memory and language, 94 1, 305–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J.
(2013) Tracking the consequences of morpho-orthographic decomposition using ERPs. Brain Research, 1529 1, 92–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H.
(2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 1, 942–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K.
(2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15 1, 507–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 1, 1090–1098. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Research Centre for Humanities Computing
(2003) Chinese character database: With word-formations. Retrieved from [URL]
Shen, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A.
(2018) The processing of Chinese compound words with ambiguous morphemes in sentence context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71 1, 131–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M.
(1994) Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 1, 271–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M.
(2010) A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25 1, 277–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C.
(2013a) Early morphological processing is sensitive to morphemic meanings: Evidence from processing ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 1, 223–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Morpho-semantic processing in word recognition: Evidence from balanced and biased ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39 1, 1990–2001.Google Scholar
(2014) Activation of morphemic meanings in processing opaque words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21 1, 1281–1286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsang, Y. K., Huang, J., Lui, M., Xue, M., Chan, Y. W. F., Wang, S., & Chen, H. C.
(2018) MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 50 1, 1763–1777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tse, C. S., Yap, M. J., Chan, Y. L., Sze, W. P., Shaoul, C., & Lin, D.
(2017) The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research Methods, 49 1, 1503–1519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B.
(2009) Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135 1, 452–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, A. W. K., Wu, Y. & Chen, H. C.
(2014) Limited role of phonology in reading Chinese two-character compounds: Evidence from an ERP study. Neuroscience. 256 1, 342–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y., Tsang, Y. K., Wong, A. W. K., & Chen, H. C.
(2017) The processing of homographic morphemes in Chinese: an ERP study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32 1, 102–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, J., & Taft, M.
(2014) Solely soles: Inter-lemma competition in inflected word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 76 1, 127–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Yusupu, R., Miao, D., Krügel, A., & Kliegl, R.
(2014) Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language. Cognition, 132 1, 181–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
(2000) The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 1, 1245–1265.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H.
(1999) Morphology, Orthography, and Phonology Reading Chinese Compound Words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 1, 525–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar