Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 18:2 (2023) ► pp.265299
Aronoff, M.
(1994) Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R.
(1997) Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37 (1), 94–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J.
(2003) The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48 (3), 615–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Kezilas, Y., Coltheart, M., Castles, A., Ziegler, J. C., Taft, M., & Grainger, J.
(2018) Taking the book from the bookshelf: Masked constituent priming effects from compound words and nonwords. Journal of Cognition, 1 (1), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bien, H., Levelt, W. J. M., & Baayen, R. H.
(2005) Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (49), 17876–17881. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
(2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41 (4), 977–990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burani, C., Salmaso, D., & Caramazza, A.
(1984) Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language, 18 1, 342–352.Google Scholar
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J.
(1989) On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28 (1), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dohmes, P., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J.
(2004) The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming. Brain and Language, 90 (1–3), 203–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Dale, R., & van Rij, J.
(2019) Lexical and frequency effects on keystroke timing: Challenges to a lexical search account from a type-to-copy task. Frontiers in Communication, 4 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(2014) Typing time as an index of morphological and semantic effects during English compound processing. Lingue e Linguaggio, 13 (2), 241–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in English compound and pseudocompound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42 (9), 1489–1495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Written production of English compounds: effects of morphology and semantic transparency. Morphology, 26 (2), 133–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., Nisbet, K. A., & Armstrong, C.
(2018) Pseudo-morphemic structure inhibits, but morphemic structure facilitates, processing of a repeated free morpheme. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33 (10), 1252–1274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., & Schmidtke, D.
(2019) LADEC: The Large Database of English Compounds. Behavior Research Methods, 51 (5), 2152–2179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C., Spalding, T. L., & Taikh, A.
(2023) Impact of morphology on written word production: An overview of empirical evidence and theoretical implications. In D. Crepaldi (Ed.), Current Issues in the Psychology of Language: Linguistic Morphology in the Mind and Brain. Routledge, 96–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E.
(2017) Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiations morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 67 1, 285–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A. W.
(1991) Word Frequency During Copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17 1, 478–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(2011) Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65 (4), 406–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K.
(2004) Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora. In Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers (Vol. 36, Issue 3, pp. 388–396). Psychonomic Society Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kandel, S., Álvarez, C. J., & Vallée, N.
(2006) Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32 (1), 18–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtönen, M., Cunillera, T., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Hultén, A., Tuomainen, J., & Laine, M.
(2007) Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1148 (1), 123–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Koester, D., & Schreuder, R.
(2011) When bicycle pump is harder to read than bicycle bell: effects of parsing cues in first and second language compound reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010 18:2, 18 (2), 364–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G., & Weber, S.
(2014) Semantic transparency, compounding, and the nature of independent variables. In F. Rainer, W. Dressler, F. Gardani, & H. C. Luschutzky (Eds.), Morphology and meaning. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D.
(2018) Automatic control: How experts act without thinking. Psychological Review, 125 (4), 453–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C.
(2009) The left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing: The disruptive effects of attention to the hands in skilled typewriting: Research article. Psychological Science, 20 (10), 1296–1300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Hierarchical Control of Cognitive Processes. The Case for Skilled Typewriting. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 541). Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., Weingarten, R., & Will, U.
(2005) Syllabic structures in typing: Evidence from deaf writers. Reading and Writing, 18 1, 497–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinet, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Alario, F. X.
(2016) Typing is writing: Linguistic properties modulate typing execution. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23 1, 1898–1906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, A.
(1998) Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production: Verb-particle combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24 (4), 904–921. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, A., & Baayen, H.
(2002) Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9 (1), 132–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahel, S., Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., & Weingarten, R.
Salthouse, T. A.
(1986) Perceptual, cognitive, and motoric aspects of transcription typing. Psychological Bulletin, 99 (3), 303–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scaltritti, M., Arfé, B., Torrance, M., & Peressotti, F.
(2016) Typing pictures: Linguistic processing cascades into finger movements. Cognition, 156 1, 16–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S.
(1987) Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc. [URL]
(1989) Reading Complex Words. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics (7th ed., pp. 53–105). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M.
(1979) Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7 (4), 263–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S.
(2006) Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon, 1 (2), 183–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taikh, A., Gagne, C., & Spalding, T. L.
in press). Influence of the constituent morpheme boundary on compound word access. Memory and Cognition.
Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Will, U.
(2004) Morphemes, syllables, and graphemes in written word production. Trends in lingustics studies and monographs, 1571, 529–572.Google Scholar
Will, U., Nottbusch, G., & Weingarten, R.
(2006) Linguistic units in word typing. Written Language & Literacy Written Language and Literacy, 9(1), 153–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weingarten, R.
(2005) Subsyllabic units in written word production. Written Language & Literacy, 8 (1), 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, M., & Logan, G. D.
(2014) Pushing typists back on the learning curve: Revealing chunking in skilled typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40 (2), 592–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Pushing typists back on the learning curve: Memory chunking in the hierarchical control of skilled typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42 (12), 1919–1936. DOI logoGoogle Scholar