Article published In:
The Mental LexiconVol. 18:1 (2023) ► pp.1–40
Long-lag repetition priming in natural text reading
No evidence for morphological effects
Most of the empirical evidence that lays the ground for research on recognition of printed morphologically complex
words comes from experimental paradigms employing morphological priming, e.g., exposure to morphologically related forms.
Furthermore, most of these paradigms rely on context-less presentation of isolated words. We examined whether well-established
morphological priming effects (i.e., faster recognition of a word preceded by a morphologically related word) are observable under
more natural conditions of fluent text reading. Using the GECO database of eye-movements recorded during the reading of a novel,
we examined the long-lag morphological and identity priming in one’s first language (L1, English and Dutch) or second language
(L2, English). While the effects of identity priming were ubiquitous, no evidence of morphological priming was observed in the L1
or L2 eye-movement record. We discuss implications of these findings for ecological validity and generalizability of select
current theories of morphological processing.
Keywords: morphological priming, long-lag priming, inflection priming, identity priming, corpus linguistics, natural reading, eye tracking
Article outline
- Inflection priming in isolated word recognition
- Isolated word recognition vs sentence reading vs text reading
- Eye-tracking studies of morphological priming
- The present study
- Methods
- Materials
- Variables
- Dependent variables
- Independent variables
- Control variables
- Statistical considerations
- Results
- Morphological priming
- Identity priming
- The effect of word class on priming
- Statistical power
- General discussion
- Morphological priming in L1
- Morphological priming in L2
- Identity priming in L1 and L2
- The effect of word class on priming
- Limitations and future directions
- Notes
-
References
References (105)
Amenta, S. and Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological Processing as We Know It: An Analytical Review of Morphological Effects in Visual Word Identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 31. 
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological review, 118(3), 438.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–8. Retrieved from [URL]
Bertram, R. (2011). Eye movements and morphological processing in reading. The Mental Lexicon,
6
(1), 83–109.
Basnight-Brown, D., Chen, L., Hua, S., Kostić, A. and Feldman, L. (2007). Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Sensitivity to form similarity varies with first language experience. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), pp.65–80.
Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology,
42
(4), 693–711.
Boston, M. F., Hale, J., Kliegl, R., Patil, U., & Vasishth, S. (2008). Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus. Journal of Eye Movement Research,
2
(1).
Burani, C. (2010). Word morphology enhances reading fluency in children with developmental dyslexia. Lingue e linguaggio,
9
(2), 177–198.
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition,
108
(1), 243–262.
Brysbaert, M., New, B., & Keuleers, E. (2012). Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods,
44
(4), 991–997.
Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition,
2
(1), 16.
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial. Journal of cognition,
1
(1), 9.
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading research quarterly,
40
(4), 428–449.
Chamberland, C., Saint-Aubin, J., & Légère, M. A. (2013). The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: Further evidence from eye movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale,
67
(2), 94.
Christie, A. (1920). The mysterious affair at styles. N.p.: John Lane. Retrieved on 7 November, 2012, from Project Gutenberg, [URL]
Ciaccio, L. A., & Jacob, G. (2019). Native speakers like affixes, L2 speakers like letters? An overt visual priming study investigating the role of orthography in L2 morphological processing. PLOS ONE,
14
(12), e0226482.
Clahsen, H. and Neubauer, K. (2010). Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and non-native speakers. Lingua, 120(11), pp.2627–2637.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
10
(12), 564–570.
Conklin, K., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research. Second Language Research, 32(3), 453–467.
Cop, U., Dirix, N., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (2017). Presenting GECO: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading. Behavior research methods,
49
(2), 602–615.
Coughlin, C. and Tremblay, A. (2014). Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), pp.524–542.
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M. and Nickels, L. (2010). ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 83–99.
Dann, K., Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2021). Morphological preview effects in English are restricted to suffixed words. Ea 3742, 1–57.
De Grauwe, S., Lemhöfer, K., Willems, R. and Schriefers, H. (2014). L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 81.
Deacon, S. H., Tong, X., & Mimeau, C. (2019). 15 Morphological and Semantic Processing in Developmental Dyslexia. Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems,
327
1.
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J., Morris, J. and Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), pp.344–358.
Dirix, N., Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2019). How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations. Behavior research methods,
51
(6), 2800–2816.
Feldman, L. B., & Andjelković, D. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 941, pp. 343–360). North-Holland.
Feldman, L. B. (1992). Bi-alphabetism and the design of a reading mechanism. In D. M. Willows, R. S. Kruk, & E. Corcos (Eds.), Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Feldman, L. B., & Bentin, S. (1994). Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
47
(2), 407–435.
Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Durđević, D. F., & Pastizzo, M. J. (2010). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism (Cambridge, England),
13
1, 119–135.
Feldman, L. B., Rueckl, J., Diliberto, K., Pastizzo, M., & Vellutino, F. R. (2002). Morphological analysis by child readers as revealed by the fragment completion task. Psychonomic bulletin & review,
9
(
3
), 529–535.
Foote, R. (2015). The Storage And Processing Of Morphologically Complex Words In L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 735–767.
Forster, K., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C. and Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(2), 211–251.
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
35
(5), 263–279.
(2006). Becoming literate in Hebrew: the grain size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science,
9
(5), 439–440.
Frost, R., Forster, K. and Deutsch, A. (1997). “What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation”: Correction to Frost et al. 1997. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1189–1191.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
13
(1), 104–115.
Godfroid, A., Ahn, J., Choi, I., Ballard, L., Cui, Y., Johnston, S., Lee, S., Sarkar, A., Yoon, H. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,
21
(3), 1–22.
Gonnerman, L., Seidenberg, M. and Andersen, E. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), pp.323–345.
Grainger, J., Dufau, S., Montant, M., Ziegler, J. C., & Fagot, J. (2012). Orthographic processing in baboons (Papio papio). Science,
336
(6078), 245–248.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. Psychological review,
103
(3), 518.
Grainger, J., Colé, P. and Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(3), 370–384.
Green, P. and MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods Ecol Evol, 71: 493–498.
Haddad, L., Weiss, Y., Katzir, T., & Bitan, T. (2018). Orthographic Transparency Enhances Morphological Segmentation in Children Reading Hebrew Words. Frontiers in Psychology,
8
1.
Heyer, V. and Clahsen, H. (2015). Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner and in scandal: dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 543–550.
Jacob, G., Fleischhauer, E. And Clahsen, H. (2013). Allomorphy and affixation in morphological processing: A cross-modal priming study with late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 924–933.
Jacob, G., Heyer, V. and Veríssimo, J. (2017). Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(6), 619–637.
Jacob, G. (2018). Morphological priming in bilingualism research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,
21
(3), 443–447.
Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology,
94
(2), 223–244.
Kamienkowski, J. E., Carbajal, M. J., Bianchi, B., Sigman, M., & Shalom, D. E. (2018). Cumulative repetition effects across multiple readings of a word: Evidence from eye movements. Discourse Processes,
55
(3), 256–271.
Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods,
42
(3), 643–650.
Kirkici, B., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism,
16
(4), 776.
Kuperman, V., Matsuki, K., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2018). Contributions of reader-and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
44
(11), 1687.
Kuperman, V., Drieghe, D., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
66
(3), 563–580.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software,
82
(13), 1–26.
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: a quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior research methods,
44
(2), 325–343.
Leminen, A., Smolka, E., Duñabeitia, J. and Pliatsikas, C. (2019). Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding). Cortex, 1161, 4–44.
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
35
(2), 381–390.
Linke, M., Bröker, F., Ramscar, M., & Baayen, H. (2017). Are baboons learning “orthographic” representations? Probably not. PLOS ONE,
12
(8), e0183876.
Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I., & Drieghe, D. (2012). Beyond isolated word recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
35
(5), 293–294.
Lowder, M. W., Choi, W., Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (2018). Lexical predictability during natural reading: Effects of surprisal and entropy reduction. Cognitive Science, 42(Suppl 4), 1166–1183.
Mann, V., & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In Reading complex words (pp. 1–25). Springer, Boston, MA.
Marantz, A. (2013). No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and cognitive processes,
28
(
7
), 905–916.
Marelli, M., Traficante, D., & Burani, C. (2020). Reading morphologically complex words: Experimental evidence and learning models. Word Knowledge and Word Usage, 5531.
Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of memory and language,
66
(4), 644–664.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R. and Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Processes in language comprehension. Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 495–524.
Masson, M. E. J., & MacLeod, C. M. (1992). Reenacting the route to interpretation: Enhanced perceptual identification without prior perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
121
(
2
), 145–176.
Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychological bulletin,
81
(12), 899.
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language,
55
(3), 381–401.
Milin, P., Smolka, E., & Feldman, L. B. (2017). Models of lexical access and morphological processing. In E. M. Fernández & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 240–268). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mousikou, P., & Schroeder, S. (2019). Morphological processing in single-word and sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
45
(5), 881.
Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research,
7
(3), 241–253.
Neubauer, K. and Clahsen, H. (2009). Decomposition of inflected words in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), pp.403–435.
Paterson, K. B., Alcock, A., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Morphological priming during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes,
26
(4–6), 600–623.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological research,
72
(6), 675–688.
Raney, G. E., & Rayner, K. (1995). Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale,
49
(2), 151.
Rastle, K., Davis, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. and Tyler, L. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537.
Raveh, M. and Rueckl, J. (2000). Equivalent Effects of Inflected and Derived Primes: Long-Term Morphological Priming in Fragment Completion and Lexical Decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 103–119.
Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Linguistic and cognitive influences on eye movements during reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of eye movements (p. 751–766). Oxford University Press.
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
62
(8), 1457–1506.
(1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.
Rayner, K., Raney, G. E., & Pollatsek, A. (1995). Eye movements and discourse processing. In R. Lorch & E. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 9–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive psychology,
7
(1), 65–81.
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Münte, T. and Clahsen, H. (2002). Morphological Priming in Spanish Verb Forms: An ERP Repetition Priming Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 443–454.
Royle, P., Drury, J. E., Bourguignon, N., & Steinhauer, K. (2012). The temporal dynamics of inflected word recognition: A masked ERP priming study of French verbs. Neuropsychologia,
50
(14), 3542–3553.
Rueckl, J. & Aicher, K. (2008). Are CORNER and BROTHER morphologically complex? Not in the long term. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 972–1001.
Rueckl, J. G., & Galantucci, B. (2005). The locus and time course of long-term morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes,
20
(
1–2
), 115–138.
Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language,
36
(
3
), 382–405.
Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Kuperman, V. (2020). CompLex: an eye-movement database of compound word reading in English. Behavior Research Methods, 53(1), 59–77.
Schmidtke, D., & Kuperman, V. (2020). Psycholinguistic Methods and Tasks in Morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.
(2019). A paradox of apparent brainless behavior: The time-course of compound word recognition. Cortex,
116
1, 250–267.
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V. (2017). Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
43
(11), 1793.
Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
4
(
9
), 353–361.
Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In: Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link, ed. P. McCardle, B. Miller, J. R. Lee & O. J. L. Tzeng, pp. 146–68. Paul H. Brookes.
(2012). Writing systems: Not optimal, but good enough. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 305.
Silva, R. and Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 245–260.
Stanners, R., Neiser, J., Hernon, W. and Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 399–412.
Traficante, D., Marcolini, S., Luci, A., Zoccolotti, P., Burani, C. (2011). How do roots and suffixes influence reading of morphological pseudowords: A study on Italian dyslexic children, Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (4–5–6), 777–793.
Ulicheva, A., Harvey, H., Aronoff, M., & Rastle, K. (2020). Skilled readers’ sensitivity to meaningful regularities in English writing. Cognition,
195
1, 103810.
Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
143
(5), 2020–2045.
Weyerts, H., Münte, T. F., Smid, H. G., & Heinze, H. J. (1996). Mental representations of morphologically complex words: an event-related potential study with adult humans. Neuroscience Letters,
206
(2–3), 125–128.
Von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2017). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of memory and language,
94
1, 119–133.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Brysbaert, Marc & Denis Drieghe
2024. The use of eye movement corpora in vocabulary research. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 100093 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.