Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 17:2 (2022) ► pp.239276
Anttila, A.
(1997) Deriving variation from grammar: A study of Finnish genitives. In F. Hinskens, R. Van Hout, & L. Wetzels (Eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory (pp. 935–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Variation and phonological theory. In J. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), Handbook of language variation and change (pp. 206–43). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Best, C. T.
(1994) The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P.
(1997) How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 21. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 43–58.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S.
(1995) Cross language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279–304). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, T. G.
(2006) Spanish rhotics and Dominican hypercorrect /s/. Probus, 18 (1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T.
(2008) Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106 1, 707–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brannen, K.
(2011) The perception and production of interdental fricatives in second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
Broselow, E., Chen, S.-I., & Wang, C.
(1998) The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 1, 261–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, C.
(1998) The role of the L1 grammar in the acquisition of L2 segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14 (2), 136–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, W.
(2007) The variable development of English word-final stops by Brazilian Portuguese speakers: A stochastic optimality theoretic account. Language Variation and Change, 19 1, 219–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The development of coda perception in second language phonology: A variationist perspective. Second Language Research, 27 (4), 433–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, H. J., & Sankoff, D.
(1974) Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language, 50 (2), 333–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J.
(1996) The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. M.
(2002) Perceptual adjustment to foreign-accented English with short term exposure. In the proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2002), 253–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T.
(2006) Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34 1, 269–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Daidone, D., & Kojima, C.
Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C.
(2005) Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 134 (2), 222–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, S.
(2011) Geminates. In M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume E., & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Volume 2 (pp. 837–859). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, L. J.
(1975) The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly, 9 (4), 401–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J.
(1999) Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 1, 1568–1578.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P.
(2004) Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26 (4), 551–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H.
(2008) Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36 (2), 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E.
(1995) Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Varonis, E.
(1984) The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34 1, 65–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, G. R.
(2007) Lexical exceptions in variable phonology. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 13 (2), 109–119.Google Scholar
Janda, R. D., & Auger, J.
(1992) Quantitative evidence, qualitative hypercorrection, sociolinguistic variables – and French speakers’ ‘eadhaches with English h/Ø. Language & Communication, 12 (3/4), 195–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
John, P.
(2006) Variable h-epenthesis in the interlanguage of francophone ESL learners. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Concordia University.
John, P., & Cardoso, W.
(2009) Francophone ESL learners’ difficulties with English /h/. In M. A. Watkins, A. S. Rauber, & B. O. Baptista (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production (pp. 118–140). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2017) Medial coda and final stops in Brazilian Portuguese-English contact. In Yavaş, M., Kehoe, M. & Cardoso, W. (Eds.), Romance-Germanic bilingual phonology (pp. 181–199). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P.
(2008) Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: the role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 64 (3), 459–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A.
(1989) Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 1 1, 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaCharité, D., & Prévost, P.
(1999) The role of L1 and of teaching in the acquisition of English sounds by francophones. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Taro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 373–385). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Mah, J.
(2011) Segmental representations in interlanguage grammars: the case of francophones and English /h/. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
Mah, J., Goad, H., & Steinhauer, K.
(2016) Using event-related brain potentials to assess perceptibility: the case of French speakers and English [h]. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 1, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(2008) The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32 1, 543–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melnik, G. A., & Pepercamp, S.
(2019) Perceptual deletion and asymmetric lexical access in second language learners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145 (13). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R.
(1989) Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ross, S.
(1994) The ins and outs of paragoge and apocope in Japanese-English interphonology. Second Language Research, 10 (1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V. L.
(2008) Speech perception in second language learners. In J. G. Hansen-Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N.
(2007) A dynamic look at L2 phonological learning: Seeking processing explanations for implicational phenomena. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29 1, 407–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & John, P.
(2011) When three equals tree: Examining the nature of phonological entries in L2 lexicons of Quebec speakers of English. In P. Trofimovich & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research: Insights from psycholinguistics (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trude, A. M., Tremblay, A., & Brown-Schmidt, S.
(2013) Limitations on adaptation to foreign accents. Journal of Memory and Language, 69 (3), 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A.
(2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 1, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, E. J., Titone, D., Genesee, F., & Steinhauer, K.
(2015) Phonological processing in late second language learners: The effects of proficiency and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–22.Google Scholar
Winford, D.
(1978) Phonological hypercorrection in the process of decreolization – the case of Trinidadian English. Journal of Linguistics, 14 (2), 277–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar