Article published In:
Explorations of morphological structure in distributional space
Edited by Melanie J. Bell, Juhani Järvikivi and Vito Pirrelli
[The Mental Lexicon 17:3] 2022
► pp. 368394
Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y.-Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., and Blevins, J.
(2019) The discriminative lexicon: A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production grounded not in (de)composition but in linear discriminative learning. Complexity. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. P.
(2016) Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boleda, G.
(2020) Distributional Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, 61:213–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G. E.
(1996) Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Booij, G. E. and Marle, J. V., editors, Yearbook of Morphology 1995, pages 1–16. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunila, M. and LaViolette, J.
(2022) What company do words keep? revisiting the distributional semantics of jr firth & zellig harris. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07750.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
Chen, J. and Chen, Z.
(2008) Extended bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika, 95(3):759–771. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chuang, Y. Y., Brown, D., Evans, R. and Baayen, R. H.
(2022) Paradigm gaps are associated with weird “distributional semantics”. Russian defective nouns and their case and number paradigms.Google Scholar
Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., and Fried, E. I.
(2018) Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior research methods, 50(1):195–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., and Borsboom, D.
(2012) qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of statistical software, 481:1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R.
(1968) Selected papers of J R Firth, 1952–59. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Gupta, P., Joulin, A., and Mikolov, T.
(2018) Learning word vectors for 157 languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06893.Google Scholar
Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., and Marelli, M.
(2019) Vector-Space Models of Semantic Representation From a Cognitive Perspective: A Discussion of Common Misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6):1006–1033. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z. S.
(1954) Distributional Structure. WORD, 10(2–3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, F.
(1983) Suomen kielen äänne-ja muotorakenne [the phonological and morphological structure of finnish]. Werner Söderström, Juva.Google Scholar
(1985) Paradigms and word forms. Studia gramatyczne, 71:135–154.Google Scholar
(1986) Frequency considerations in morphology. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 39(1–4):19–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Finnish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, F. and Koskenniemi, K.
(1985) A process model of morphology and lexicon. Folia Linguistica, 291:207–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krijthe, J. H.
(2015) Rtsne: T-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding using Barnes-Hut Implementation. R package version 0.16.Google Scholar
Laine, M., Kujala, P., Niemi, J., and Uusipaikka, E.
(1992) On the nature of naming difficulties in aphasia. Cortex, 28(4):537–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. and Dumais, S.
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2):211–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marelli, M. and Baroni, M.
(2015) Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122(3):485–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J.
(2013) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. 1st International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2013 – Workshop Track Proceedings, pages 1–12.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, A., Ashaie, S., Hallikainen, M., Hänninen, T., Higby, E., Hyun, J., Lehtonen, M., and Soininen, H.
(2019) Effects of morphological family on word recognition in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 1161:91–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. H.
(1997) How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 371:118–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shafaei-Bajestan, E., Moradipour-Tari, M., Uhrig, P., and Baayen, R. H.
(2022) Semantic properties of english nominal pluralization: Insights from word embeddings. arXiv.Google Scholar
Shafaei-Bajestan, Elnaz, Uhrig, Peter and Baayen, R. H.
Shahmohammadi, H., Lensch, H., and Baayen, R. H.
(2021) Learning zero-shot multifaceted visually grounded word embeddings via multi-task training. CoNLL 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Describing English language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tibshirani, R.
(1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1):267–288.Google Scholar
van der Maaten, L.
(2014) Accelerating t-sne using tree-based algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 151:3221–3245.Google Scholar
van der Maaten, L. and Hinton, G.
(2008) Visualizing high-dimensional data using t-sne. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 91:2579–2605.Google Scholar
Wang, B., Wang, A., Chen, F., Wang, Y., and Kuo, C. C.
(2019) Evaluating word embedding models: Methods and experimental results. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 81(May):e19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar