Behavioural evidence for implicative paradigmatic relations
Form predictability has long been known to influence speaker behaviour in language learning and use. However, this
observation has largely remained dissociated from the question of the most apt theoretical framing of the effects observed. We set
out to seek evidence that speakers’ relationship to form predictability is best characterised in paradigmatic terms: in an
experimental task comparable to prediction of one word form from a related one, speakers appear sensitive to the probabilistic,
implicative relations that make up a morphological paradigm. We find this effect to be omnidirectional, from any paradigm cell to
any paradigm cell. Form predictability does not impact speaker behaviour in a vacuum, but instead works together with aspects of
memory and learning to organise the mental lexicon and inform language use. In a corpus study, we map out the complex
relationships that exist between paradigmatic form predictability, lexeme frequency and cell frequency in the context of
naturalistic language use. Speakers appear to exploit all available probabilistic relationships between the word forms of a
language in a way that is predicted by Word and Paradigm theories of morphology, with memory and predictive processing playing a
mediating role in all aspects of language use.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1The implicative structure of paradigms
- 2.2Quantitatively tackling the PCFP
- 2.3Zipfian frequency distributions, discriminability and the PCFP
- 2.4Shifting the perspective: Form predictability as a paradigmatic phenomenon
- 2.5Predictions and outline
- 3.Acceptability judgement experiment
- 3.1Items
- 3.2Procedure
- 3.3Subjects
- 3.4Analysis
- Paradigmatic predictability
- Condition
- Paradigmatic predictability: Condition
- Phonological Well-formedness
- 3.5Results
- 3.6Discussion
- 4.Corpus Study
- 4.1Methodology
- 4.1.1Data selection
- 4.1.2Model structure
- Predicted variable
- Predictor Variables
- Paradigmatic predictability
- Co-paradigmatic frequency
- Cell frequency
- 4.2Results
- 4.3Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (86)
References
Ackerman, F., Blevins, J. P., & Malouf, R. (2009). Parts
and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. (Cit. on
pp. 3, 8). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ackerman, F., & Malouf, R. (2013). Morphological
organization: the low conditional entropy
conjecture. Language,
89
1, 429–464 (cit.
on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albright, A.C. (2003). A
Quantitative Study of Spanish Paradigm Gaps. WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast
Conference on Formal Linguistics (cit. on pp. 7, 20,
26).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albright, A. C. (2002). The
Identification of Bases in Morphological Paradigms (Doctoral
dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles. (Cit. on pp. 2, 8, 11, 24,
26).
Albright, A. C., & Hayes, B. P. (2003). Rules
vs. Analogy in English Past Tenses: A Computational/Experimental
Study. Cognition,
90
1, 119–161 (cit.
on pp. 3, 6, 26). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More
than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and
Language,
62
1, 67–82 (cit.
on p. 11). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology
by itself. MIT Press. (Cit. on
p. 3).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R.H. (2011). Corpus
linguistics and naive discriminative learning. Revista Brasileira de Linguística
Aplicada,
11
1, 295–328 (cit.
on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y.-Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Blevins, J. P. (2019). The
discriminative lexicon: A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production
grounded not in (de) composition but in linear discriminative learning. Complexity,
2019 (cit. on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological
influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and
Language,
55
(2), 290–313 (cit.
on p. 28). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R.H., Hendrix, P., & Ramscar, M. (2013). Sidestepping
the combinatorial explosion: an explanation of n-gram frequency effects based on naive discriminative
learning. Language and
Speech,
56
(Pt
3), 329–47 (cit. on
p. 11). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2013). Oxford
Reference Guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press. (Cit. on p. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beniamine, S. (2018). Typologie
quantitative des systèmes de classes flexionnelles (Doctoral
dissertation). Université Paris Diderot. (Cit. on
pp. 7, 13).
Beniamine, S. (2021). One
lexeme, many classes: Inflection class systems as lattices. In B. Crysmann & M. Sailer (Eds.), One-to-many
relations in morphology, syntax and
semantics (pp. 23–51). Language Science Press. (Cit. on p. 28).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beniamine, S., Bonami, O., & Luís, A. R. (2021). The
fine implicative structure of European Portuguese
conjugation. Isogloss,
7
(1–35) (cit.
on pp. 7, 9). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beniamine, S., Coavoux, M., & Bonami, O. (2022). French
verbal frequencies in the Open Subtitles corpus [ ]. (Cit. on p. 24). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berko Gleason, J. (1958). The
Child’s Learning of English
Morphology. Word,
14
1 (cit. on
pp. 3, 8).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blevins, J. P., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M. (2017). The
Zipfian Paradigm Cell Filling Problem. Empirical Approaches to Linguistic
Theory (cit. on p. 21). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blevins, J. P. (2016). Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford University Press. (Cit. on
pp. 3, 4). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonami, O., & Beniamine, S. (2016). Joint
predictiveness in inflectional paradigms. Word
Structure,
9
(2), 156–182 (cit.
on pp. 7, 12). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonami, O., & Boyé, G. (2014). De
formes en thèmes. In F. Villoing, S. Leroy, & S. David (Eds.), Foisonnements
morphologiques. Etudes en hommage à Françoise
Kerleroux (pp. 17–45). Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest. (Cit. on pp. 11,
12).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonami, O., Caron, G., & Plancq, C. (2014). Construction
d’un lexique flexionnel phonétisé libre du français. Quatrième Congrès mondial de linguistique
française (cit. on pp. 13, 14, 22). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonami, O., & Strnadová, J. (2019). Paradigm
structure and predictability in derivational
morphology. Morphology,
29
1 (cit.
on p. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boye, G., & Schalchli, G. (2016). The
status of paradigms. In A. Hippisley & G. Stump (Eds.), The
Cambridge Handbook of
Morphology (pp. 206–234). Cambridge University Press. (Cit. on p. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brooks, M. E., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K. J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C. W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H. J., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. M. (2017). glmmTMB
balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed
modeling. The R
Journal,
9
(2), 378–400. [URL] (cit. on
pp. 14, 23) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects
of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. (Cit. on
p. 3).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
del Prado Martín, F. M., Kostić, A., & Baayen, H. R. (2004). Putting
the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological
processing. Cognition,
94
(1), 1–18 (cit.
on pp. 26, 28, 29). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Marneffe, M.-C., Manning, C. D., Nivre, J., & Zeman, D. (2021). Universal
Dependencies. Computational
Linguistics,
47
(2), 255–308 (cit.
on p. 24). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filipović Durđević, D., & Milin, P. (2019). Information
and learning in processing adjective inflection [Structure in words: the present and future of morphologicalical processing in
a multidisciplinary
perspective]. Cortex,
116
1, 209–227 (cit.
on p. 8).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frank, S. L., Otten, L. J., Galli, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). The
ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences. Brain and
Language,
140
1, 1–11 (cit.
on p. 18). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guzmán Naranjo, M. (2020). Analogy,
complexity and predictability in the Russian nominal inflection
system. Morphology,
30
(3), 219–262 (cit.
on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D. (2010). Understanding
Morphology. Arnold. (Cit. on pp. 20,
25).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hathout, N., Sajous, F., & Calderone, B. (2014). GLÀFF,
a large versatile French lexicon. Proceedings of LREC 2014 (cit. on
p. 22).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, C. F. (1967). The
Yawelmani basic
verb. Language,
43
1, 208–222 (cit.
on p. 4). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The
Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press. (Cit. on p. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jun, J., & Albright, A. (2016). Speakers’
Knowledge of Alternations Is Asymmetrical: Evidence from Seoul Korean Verb
Paradigms. Cambridge University Press. (Cit. on
pp. 9–11, 17, 19, 30).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy:
A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior research
methods,
42
1, 627–33 (cit.
on p. 13). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiefer, F. (2000). Regularity. In Morphologie:
Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/Morphology: An international Handbook on Inflection and
Word-Formation. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. (Cit. on
pp. 20, 25). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain
potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic
association. Nature,
307
1, 161–163 (cit.
on p. 18). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Le, H., Vial, L., Frej, J., Segonne, V., Coavoux, M., Lecouteux, B., Allauzen, A., Crabbé, B., Besacier, L., & Schwab, D. (2020). FlauBERT:
Unsupervised language model pre-training for French. Proceedings of the Twelfth Language
Resources and Evaluation Conference, 2479–2490. [URL] (cit. on
p. 24)
Lévèque, D., & Pellard, T. (2023). The
implicative structure of Asama verb
paradigms. Morphology,
33
1 (cit.
on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieberman, E., Michel, J.-B., Jackson, J., Tang, T., & Nowak, M. A. (2007). Quantifying
the evolutionary dynamics of
language. Nature,
449
(7163), 713–716 (cit.
on pp. 7, 20). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lison, P., & Tiedemann, J. (2016). OpenSubtitles2016:
Extracting large parallel corpora from movie and TV subtitles. Proceedings of the Tenth
International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation
(LREC’16), 923–929. [URL] (cit. on
p. 24)
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., & Baayen, H. (2018). Whole-word
frequency and inflectional paradigm size facilitate Estonian case-inflected noun
processing. Cognition,
175
1, 20–25 (cit.
on pp. 10, 28). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B., & Baayen, H. (2018). Production
of Estonian case-inflected nouns shows whole-word frequency and paradigmatic
effects. Morphology,
28
1 (cit.
on pp. 10, 28). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lukatela, G., Gligorijević, B., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Representation
of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory &
Cognition,
8
1, 415–423 (cit.
on p. 8). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maiden, M. (1995). A
Linguistic History of Italian. Longman. [URL]. (Cit. on
p. 20)
Malouf, R. (2017). Abstractive
morphological learning with a recurrent neural
network. Morphology,
27
1, 431–458 (cit.
on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mansfield, J. (2016). Intersecting
formatives and inflectional predictability: How do speakers and learners predict the correct form of Murrinhpatha
verbs? Word
Structure,
9
1, 183–214 (cit.
on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcus, G. F. (2001). The
Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science. The MIT Press. (Cit. on p. 8). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., Xu, F., & Clahsen, H. (1992). Overregularization
in Language Acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development,
57
(4), i–178. Retrieved September 23, 2022, from [URL] (cit. on
p. 21) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Marzi, C., Ferro, M., & Pirrelli, V. (2019). A
Processing-Oriented Investigation of Inflectional Complexity. Frontiers in
Communication,
4
1 (cit. on
p. 21). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthews, P. H. (1965). The
inflectional component of a word-and-paradigm grammar. Journal of
Linguistics,
1
1, 139–171 (cit.
on p. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional
Morphology. A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge University Press. (Cit. on p. 4).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology (2nd). Cambridge University Press. (Cit. on p. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milin, P., & Blevins, J. P. (2020). Paradigms
in morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of
Linguistics. Oxford University Press. (Cit. on
p. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostic, A., & Baayen, H. (2009). Paradigms
bit by bit: An information theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and
derivation (cit. on pp. 10, 28). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting
the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological
processing. Cognition,
94
1, 1–18 (cit.
on p. 10). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pellegrini, M. (2021). Patterns
of interpredictability and principal parts in Latin verb paradigms: An entropy-based
approach. Journal of Latin
Linguistics,
20
(1) (cit. on
p. 7).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S. (1999). Words
and Rules: The Ingredients Of Language. Basic Books. [URL]. (Cit. on
p. 21)
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On
language and connectionism: Analysis ofa parallel distributed processing model of language
acquisition. Cognition,
28
(1), 73193 (cit.
on p. 8). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisation
of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive
Processes,
8
1, 1–56 (cit.
on p. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramscar, M. (2021). A
discriminative account of the learning, representation and processing of inflection
systems. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (cit. on
p. 7).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. (2004). The
Effects of Frequency and Predictability on Eye Fixations in Reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader
Model. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and
performance,
30
1, 720–32 (cit.
on p. 18). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robins, R. H. (1959). In
defense of WP. Transactions of the Philological
Society,
58
1, 116–144 (cit.
on p. 4). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On
Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs. In Parallel Distributed
Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and Biological
Models (pp. 216–271). MIT Press. (Cit. on pp. 7, 8). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schafer, R. (2015). Processing
and Querying Large Web Corpora with the COW14 architecture. Proceedings of Challenges in the
Management of Large Corpora, 28–34 (cit. on
pp. 23, 24).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seyfarth, S., Ackerman, F., & Malouf, R. (2014). Implicative
organization facilitates morphological learning. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the
Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–494 (cit. on
p. 9). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sims, A. D. (2015). Inflectional
defectiveness. Cambridge University Press. (Cit. on
pp. 7, 20). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sims, A. D., & Parker, J. (2016). How
inflection class systems work: On the informativity of implicative structure. Word
Structure,
9
1, 215–239 (cit.
on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2011). Cloze
but no cigar: The complex relationship between cloze, corpus, and subjective probabilities in language
processing. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science
Society,
33
1 (cit. on
p. 18).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013). The
effect of word predictability on reading time is
logarithmic. Cognition,
128
(3), 302–319 (cit.
on p. 18). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Štekauer, P. (2014). Derivational
Paradigms. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The
Oxford Handbook of Derivational
Morphology (pp. 354–369). Oxford University Press. (Cit. on p. 3).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional
Morphology. A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge University Press. (Cit. on p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stump, G. T., & Finkel, R. (2013). Morphological
Typology: From Word to Paradigm. Cambridge University Press. (Cit. on pp. 3, 9). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullman, M. (2001). A
neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature reviews.
Neuroscience,
2
1, 717–26 (cit.
on p. 8). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilmoth, S., & Mansfield, J. (2021). Inflectional
predictability and prosodic morphology in Pitjantjatjara and
Yankunytjatjara. Morphology (cit. on
p. 7). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wu, S., Cotterell, R., & O’Donnell, T. J. (2019). Morphological
Irregularity Correlates with Frequency. CoRR, abs/1906.11483. [URL] (cit. on
pp. 7, 11, 21, 22, 25) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Wunderlich, D., & Fabri, R. (1995). Minimalist
Morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für
Sprachwissenschaft,
14
(2), 236–294 (cit.
onp. 3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wurzel, W. U. (1984). Flexionsmorphologie
und NatÃŒdichkeit: Ein beitrag zur mor-phologischen theoriebildung. Akademie Verlag. (Cit. on p. 4).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wurzel, W. U. (1989). Inflectional
Morphology and Naturalness (cit. on
p. 4).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, C. (2016). The
Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of LanguageHow Children Learn to Break the Rules of
Language. (Cit. on p. 21).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zehr, J., & Schwarz, F. (2018). PennController
for Internet Based Experiments (cit. on
p. 14).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Copot, Maria & Olivier Bonami
2024.
Baseless derivation: the behavioural reality of derivational paradigms.
Cognitive Linguistics 35:2
► pp. 221 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.