Article published In:
Bridging the Methodological Divide: Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to formulaic language
Edited by Stefanie Wulff and Debra Titone
[The Mental Lexicon 9:3] 2014
► pp. 371376
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P
(1988) The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory & Language, 271, 668–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., Bergen, B.K., & Zinken, J
(2007) The cognitive linguistics enterprise: An overview. In Benjamin K. Bergen, Vyvyan Evans & Jörg Zinken (Eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader (pp. 2–36). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D
(2006) Methodology in cognitive linguistics. In Gitte Kristiansen, Michael Achard, René Dirven & Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 21–49). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. Jr
(2007) Why cognitive linguistics should care more about empirical methods. In Mónica González-Márquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson & Michael J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 2–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Nayak, N.P., & Cutting, J.C
(1989) How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 281, 576–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Libben, M.R., & Titone, D.A
(2008) The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 361, 1103–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, G
(1978) The pragmatics of reference. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics.Google Scholar
Titone, D., & Connine, C.M
(1999) On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 311, 1655–1674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, A
(2012) What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S
(2008) Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. London/New York: 
Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Schmitt, Norbert, Suhad Sonbul, Laura Vilkaitė‐Lozdienė & Marijana Macis
2019. Formulaic Language and Collocation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zang, Chuanli
2019. New Perspectives on Serialism and Parallelism in Oculomotor Control During Reading: The Multi-Constituent Unit Hypothesis. Vision 3:4  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Zang, Chuanli, Shuangshuang Wang, Xuejun Bai, Guoli Yan & Simon P. Liversedge
2024. Parafoveal processing of Chinese four-character idioms and phrases in reading: Evidence for multi-constituent unit hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 136  pp. 104508 ff. DOI logo
Zang, Chuanli, Zhichao Zhang, Manman Zhang, Federica Degno & Simon P. Liversedge
2023. Examining semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects using a Stroop boundary paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language 128  pp. 104387 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.