Literal or metaphorical? Conventional or creative?
Contested metaphoricity in intense emotional experiences
Metaphor has long been considered a ‘way in’ to people’s experiences, with metaphor analysis being used to gain insights into a range of psychological and physiological phenomena. However, a number of challenges arise when analysing metaphor in such contexts. We reflect on the challenges we have encountered in our research into intensely emotional and/or personal experiences related to bereavement and religious belief. Both areas showcase metaphor operating in the ‘liminal spaces’ of human experience. The spaces between life and death, personhood and non-personhood, and belief and non-belief prove rich ground for metaphor, but the qualities of these metaphors are as complex and elusive as the concepts they are being used to describe.
We explore how metaphoricity in general, and creative use of metaphor in particular, in these contexts are flexible phenomena, opening up new questions as to what ‘counts’ as a (creative) metaphor. We propose three levels at which people use or experience metaphor, show how these interact, and propose a number of methodological factors to be taken into consideration when conducting metaphor research in such complex areas of human experience.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and background
- 2.Our approach to metaphor identification
- 3.Metaphor at the level of language – ‘I talk about it as if…’
- 3.1Metaphorical or literal? The case of (embodied) metaphors for emotional states
- 3.2Creative uses of metaphor
- a.The (apparent) introduction of a new metaphorical comparison, drawing together previously unrelated elements
- b.Altering the valence of a metaphor
- c.Introducing more detail into a conventional metaphorical comparison, or extending it in a novel way
- d.Using a conventional metaphorical expression/idiom in a new context where it is not usually used, or to talk about something that it is not usually used to talk about
- e.Using a ‘twice true’ metaphor
- f.Combining metaphor with metonymy in a novel way
- 4.Beyond metaphor in language
- 4.1‘I experience it as something else’
- 4.2‘I believe it is something else’
- 5.Conclusion: Towards an ecological approach to coding: Considerations to be taken into account when identifying and classifying metaphor in accounts of intense emotional experiences
- Talking, experiencing or believing?
- Consider your own viewpoint: Metaphorical for whom?
- Is it metaphorical, metonymic, literal, or all three?
- Creative for whom?
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (44)
References
Barnden, J. A. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics,
21
(1), 1–34.
Barron, F. (1969). Creative Person and Creative Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Bell, C. M. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. Oxford University Press.
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Discourse. Equinox.
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor Analysis. Equinox.
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol,
24
(2), 63–89.
Camp, E. (2008). Showing, telling, and seeing: metaphor and ‘poetic’ language. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication,
3
1, 1–24.
Charteris-Black, J. (2012). Shattering the bell jar: metaphor, gender and depression. Metaphor and Symbol,
27
(3), 199–216.
Clarke, M., Littlemore, J., Debelle, G. & Taylor, J. (2022). Exploring child abuse linked to faith or belief (CALFB): diversity and debate. Nursing Children and Young People.
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (2021). Figurative language communicates directly because it precisely demonstrates what we mean. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale,
75
(2), 228–233.
Cook, G. (2000). Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford University Press.
Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity,
2
(4), 239–250.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Walter de Gruyter.
Fuoli, M., Littlemore, J., & Turner, S. (2022). Sunken ships and screaming banshees: Metaphor and evaluation in film reviews. English Language & Linguistics,
26
(1), 75–103.
Gibbs, R. W. (2019). Metaphor as dynamical–ecological performance. Metaphor and Symbol,
34
(1), 33–44.
Gibbs, R. W. (2020). Finding metaphor in the natural world. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference of Figurative Thought and Language, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Gibbs, R. W. (2022). What’s figurative about figurative language? Paper presented at the 6th International Conference of Figurative Thought and Language, Poznan, Poland.
Gibbs, R. W., & Franks, H. (2002). Embodied metaphor in women’s narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication,
14
1, 139–165.
Johansson Falck, M. and L. Okonski. (2022). Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS): A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to Bridge Theory and Practice. Cognitive Semantics,
8
(2), 294–322.
Julich-Warpakowski, N. (2020). “Motion Expressions in Music Criticism–An Investigation of their Conceptual Motivation and their Metaphoricity” (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Leipzig).
Klass, D., & Steffen, E. M. (Eds.). (2017). Continuing Bonds in Bereavement: New Directions for Research and Practice. Routledge.
Littlemore, J., & Turner, S. (2019). What can metaphor tell us about experiences of pregnancy loss and how are these experiences reflected in midwife practice? Frontiers in Communication,
42
1.
MacArthur, F., Krennmayr, T., & Littlemore, J. (2015). How basic is “understanding is seeing” when reasoning about knowledge? Asymmetric uses of sight metaphors in office hours consultations in English as academic lingua franca. Metaphor and Symbol,
30
(3), 184–217.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Oakley, L., Kinmond, K., Humphreys, J., & Dioum, M. (2017). Practitioner and communities’ awareness of CALFB: Child abuse linked to faith or belief. Child Abuse and Neglect,
72
1, 276–282.
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N. (2014). Let’s talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol,
29
(4), 298–315.
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Semino, E., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Koller, V., & Olza, I. (2022). Acting like a hedgehog in times of pandemic: Metaphorical creativity in the# ReframeCovid collection. Metaphor and Symbol,
37
(2), 127–139.
PRAGGLEJAZ Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol,
22
(1), 1–39.
Richards, R. E. (2007). Everyday Creativity and New Views of Human Nature: Psychological, Social, and Spiritual Perspectives. American Psychological Association.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Demmen, J., Koller, V., Payne, S., Hardie, A., & Rayson, P. (2017). The online use of Violence and Journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care, 71, 60–66.
Semino, E., Demjen, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P. (2018). Metaphor, Cancer and the End of Life. Routledge.
Shinebourne, P., & Smith, J. A. (2010). The communicative power of metaphors: An analysis and interpretation of metaphors in accounts of the experience of addiction. Psychol. Psychotherapy, Theory, Research and Practice,
83
1, 59–73.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stobart, E. (2006). Child abuse linked to accusations about ‘possession’ and ‘witchcraft’. Research Report no 750. UK Department for Education and Skills.
Tedam, P. & Adjoa, A. (2017). The W Word: Witchcraft Labelling and Child Safeguarding in Social Work Practice. Critical Publishing.
Turner, S. (2021). Multimodality. In S. Pihlajha (Ed.), Analysing Religious Discourse (pp. 70–90). Cambridge University Press.
Turner, S., Littlemore, J., Fuller, D., Kuberska, K., & McGuinness, S. (2020). The production of time-related metaphors by people who have experienced pregnancy loss. In A. Gargett & J. Barnden (Eds.), Producing Figurative Expression (pp. 389–418). John Benjamins.
Turner, S., Littlemore, J., Taylor, J., Parr, E., & Topping, A. (2022a). Metaphors that shape parents’ perceptions of effective communication with healthcare practitioners following child death: a qualitative UK study. BMJ Open,
12
(1).
Turner, S., Littlemore, J., Parr, E., Taylor, J., & Topping, A. (2022b). ‘Lights in the darkness’, part 1: characterising effective communication with healthcare practitioners following the death of a child. Mortality, 1–18.
Turner, S., Littlemore, J., Parr, E., Taylor, J., & Topping, A. (2022c). ‘Lights in the darkness’, part 2: characterising effective communication with professional groups following the death of a child. Mortality, 1–16.
Williams-Whitney, D., Mio, J. S., & Whitney, P. (1992). Metaphor production in creative writing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,
21
(6), 497–509.
Wilson, J. P., and Lindy, J. D. (2013). Trauma, Culture, and Metaphor: Pathways of Transformation and Integration. Routledge.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Ichien, Nicholas, Dušan Stamenković & Keith J. Holyoak
2024.
Large Language Model Displays Emergent Ability to Interpret Novel Literary Metaphors.
Metaphor and Symbol 39:4
► pp. 296 ff.
O'Dowd, Niamh A., Lorraine Adriano & Jeannette Littlemore
2024.
“Our earth, it's like it's in a toaster”: Creative, figurative and narrative interactions in interviews with lower secondary school students about climate activism.
Language & Communication 99
► pp. 19 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2024.
The Ambiguity of Metaphor: How Polysemy Affords Multivalent Metaphor Use and Explains the Paradox of Metaphor.
Metaphor and Symbol 39:4
► pp. 242 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.