Political metaphor, a matter of purposeful style
On the rational, emotional and strategic purposes of political metaphor
There are currently attempts to dovetail classical and conceptual metaphor to improve analyses of metaphor in political discourse, but the results, to date, are not robust or sufficiently comprehensive. In this article, I return to Aristotle’s original definition of metaphor in order to set up a framework for the analysis of political metaphors. I first designate the exact position of Aristotle’s theory within conceptual metaphor theory, in order to avoid a lack of coherence between classical and conceptual metaphor theory. In the combination of the two theories I am able to define three styles of purposeful political use of metaphor: reason-based, emotion-based and strategy-based usage of (conceptual) metaphor. These styles are significant, because using a political metaphor is performing a political speech-act, and an important purpose of that speech-act, besides persuasion, is establishing a political identity and style. Examples of the three metaphor purposes and styles show how they can be identified in political discourse. The framework can be used in further political analysis to assess what the role of rhetorical style is in political processes.
References (39)
Ankersmit, F.R. (1996). Aesthetic politics: Political philosophy beyond fact and value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation. [Edited by J. Barnes]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press..
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. [Edited by J.O. Urmson & M. Sbisà] (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Black, M. (1954). Metaphor. The Aristotelian Society, 551, 273–294.
Carey, C. (1996). Rhetorical means of persuasion. In A. Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, J. (2009). Metaphor and political communication. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 97–115). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, J. (2014). Analysing political speeches. Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dirven, R. (2002). Introduction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 1–38). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Eco, U. (1983). The scandal of metaphor: Metaphorology and semiotics. Poetics Today, 4(2), 217–257.
Fontana, B., Nederman, C.J., & Remer, G. (2004). Introduction: Deliberative democracy and the rhetorical turn. In B. Fontana, C.J. Nederman & G. Remer (Eds.), Talking democracy: Historical perspectives on rhetoric and democracy (pp. 1–25). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Frede, D. (1992). The cognitive role of phantasia in Aristotle. In M.C. Nussbaum & A. Oksenberg Rorty (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s de anima. [Kindle version] (Chapter 15). Retrieved from: [URL]
Friedman, T.L. (2014). Putin and the laws of gravity. New York Times, A23. New York.
Garsten, B. (2006). Saving persuasion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B.F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holoyoak & B.N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kirby, J.T. (1997). Aristotle on metaphor. The American Journal of Philology, 118(4), 517–554.
Kopan, Ta. (2014). Tom Perkins apologizes for “Kristalnacht.” Politico. Retrieved February 16, 2014, from [URL]
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Afterword. In G. Lakoff & M. Johnson (Eds.), Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.) (pp. 243–276). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Mahon, J.E. (1999). Getting your sources right: What Aristotle didn’t say. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 69–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. (2013). Politics and rhetoric: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
Night of broken metaphors. (2014). The Economist. Retrieved from [URL]
Nussbaum, M.C. (1996). Aristotle on emotions and rational persuasion. In A. Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric (pp. 303–323). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Nussbaum, M.C., & Putnam, H. (1992). Changing Aristotle’s mind. In M.C. Nussbaum & A. Oksenberg Rorty (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s de anima. [Kindle version] (Chapter 3). Retrieved from: [URL]
Oksenberg Rorty, A. (1996). Structuring rhetoric. In A. Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric (pp. 1–33). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor, language and thought. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Perkins, T. (2014). Progressive Kristalnacht coming? Wall Street Journal, (January 24th).
Postma, T. (2011). Metaphor and register variation: The personalization of Dutch news discourse. Doctoral dissertation, VU University, Amsterdam. Retrieved from: [URL]
Richards, I.A. (1936). The Philosophy of rhetoric. Controversies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1975 [2003]). The rule of metaphor. The creation of meaning in language (1975, R. Czerny et al., trans.). London, UK: Routledge.
Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53.
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 231, 213–241.
The end of the oil age. (2003). The Economist. Retrieved from [URL]
Wilders, G. (2012). Join our protest against the profiteering eurocrats. Retrieved June 24, 2014, from [URL]
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Tayebipour, Meysam
2023.
Theoretical Frameworks. In
Ayatollah Khomeini Through the Lens of the Iran-Iraq War [
Studies in Iranian Politics, ],
► pp. 43 ff.
Schoor, Carola
2017.
In the theater of political style: Touches of populism, pluralism and elitism in speeches of politicians.
Discourse & Society 28:6
► pp. 657 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.