Previous research has argued that narrative is an evolutionary adaptation, offering advantages in terms of survival and reproductive successes. It is yet unclear, however, how narratives may promote our fitness to survive. Integrating developments in narrative theory, evolutionary psychology, communication science, and cognitive neuroscience, this article presents a Mental Simulation Model that explains the mechanisms through which narratives prepare us for potential life-threatening events in the future. The model proposes that the design features of narrative (setting, perspective, and action) facilitate various distinctive processes of mental simulation (transportation, identification, and action simulation). It is argued that these simulation processes are capable of enhancing our fitness to survive in distinct but complementary ways. The article offers testable propositions and discusses empirical implications.
Arora, S., Aggarwal, R., Sirimanna, P., Moran, A., Grantcharov, T., Kneebone, R., … Darzi, A. (2011). Mental practice enhances surgical technical skills: A randomized controlled study. Annals of Surgery, 253(2), 265–270.
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 16(18), 1818–1823.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Notes toward a historical poetics. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 84–258). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1), e55341.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04), 637–660.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 591, 617–645.
Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Carroll, J. (1995). Evolution and literary theory. Human Nature, 6(2), 119–134.
Carroll, J. (2005). Human nature and literary meaning: A theoretical model illustrated with a critique of Pride and Prejudice. In J. Gottschall & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. 76–106). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Carroll, J. (2011). Reading human nature: Literary Darwinism in theory and practice. Albany: SUNY Press.
Carroll, P., & Shepperd, J. A. (2009). Preparedness, mental simulations, and future outlooks. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 425–440). New York: Psychology Press.
Decety, J., & Ingvar, D. H. (1990). Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: A neuropsychological interpretation. Acta Psychologica, 73(1), 13–34.
Dissanayake, E. (1995). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Dissanayake, E. (2000). Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Emmott, C. (1997). Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Farner, G. (2014). Literary fiction: The ways we read narrative literature. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850.
Fodor, J. A. (1976). The language of thought. Sussex: Harvester Press.
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28(1), 3–71.
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gerardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehéricy, S., Poline, J. -B., Gaymard, B., Marsault, C., … Le Bihan, D. (2000). Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10(11), 1093–1104.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565.
Gottschall, J., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Green, M. C., Aldao, A., Pollack, B., Rozin, P., & Small, A. (2004). Effect of story details on transportation into narrative worlds and identification with characters. Paper presented at the IGEL conference, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, Edmonton.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
Green, M. C., & Donahue, J. K. (2009). Simulated worlds: Transportation into narratives. In: K. Markman, W. M. Klein, & J. A. Stuhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 241–256). New York: Psychology Press.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307.
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), S103–S109.
Kaschak, M. P., Zwaan, R. A., Aveyard, M., & Yaxley, R. H. (2006). Perception of auditory motion affects language processing. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 733–744.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380.
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192.
Niles, J. D. (2010). Homo narrans: The poetics and anthropology of oral literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628.
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 251, 19–43.
Omaha World-Herald (2007, December6). ‘Horror of massacre hits home.’ p.04A.
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54.
Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396.
Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2002). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Rizzolatti, G. (2005). The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 210(5), 419–421.
Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L. (2017). Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 1–15.
Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2001a). Food, foragers, and folklore: The role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 221–240.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2001b). Narrative theory and function: Why evolution matters. Philosophy and Literature, 25(2), 233–250.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2005). Reverse-engineering narrative: Evidence of special design. In J. Gottschall & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. 177–196). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657–661.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1975). Scripts, Plans, and Knowledge. Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, Tblisi, Georgia.
Segal, E. M. (1995). Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(03), 299–313.
Szpunar, K. K. (2010). Episodic future thought an emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142–162.
The Associated Press (2007, April16). ‘Gunman killed 21, wounds 21 at Virginia Tech shooting before being killed’.
The Denver Post (2012, July21). ‘Disbelief, horror, worry and then, finally, relief.’ p.6A.
The New York Times (2007, April 17). ‘Drumbeat of shots, broken by pauses to reload.’ p.1.
The New York Times (2012, July21). ‘Gunman kills 12 at Colorado theater; Scores are wounded, reviving debate.’ p.1.
The Virginian-Pilot (2007, April19). ‘In tech aftermath, mom, son rush desparately to connect.’ p.A1.
The Washington Post (2007, April19). ‘That was the desk I chose to die under.’ p.A01.
The Washington Post (2012, December16). ‘Seeking calm amid the terror.’ p.A01.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction, and the arts. SubStance, 30(1), 6–27.
USA Today (2008, February18). ‘Student, shot in head, ran back for girlfriend.’ p.3A.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Van Krieken, K., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J. (2015). From reader to mediated witness: The engaging effects of journalistic crime narratives. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(3), 580–596.
Van Krieken, K., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J. (2017). Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters: A linguistic cues framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 1190.
Van Krieken, K., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H. (2016). Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. In B. Dancygier, W. -l. Lu & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 145–168). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Weinberg, R. (2008). Does imagery work? Effects on performance and mental skills. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 3(1), 1–21.
Willems, R. M., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2010). Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right-and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21(1), 67–74.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thoughts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Yaxley, R. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Simulating visibility during language comprehension. Cognition, 105(1), 229–236.
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models and the mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 15–18.
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 441, pp. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1351, 1–11.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
van Krieken, Kobie & Enny Das
2024. This is the End: The Role of Death in the Narrative Structure of Popular Movies. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Yergensen, Brent
2024. Popular narratology as the swivel of death’s door: rhetoric as transition and transcendence to life’s end. Communication Quarterly 72:3 ► pp. 233 ff.
Schmidt, Marie-Luise C. R., Julia R. Winkler, Markus Appel & Tobias Richter
2023. Tracking Emotional Shifts During Story Reception: The Relationship Between Narrative Structure and Affective Responses. Scientific Study of Literature 12:1 ► pp. 17 ff.
Willems, Roel M.
2023. MA-EM: A neurocognitive model for understanding mixed and ambiguous emotions and morality. Cognitive Neuroscience 14:2 ► pp. 51 ff.
Scrivner, Coltan, John A. Johnson, Jens Kjeldgaard-Christiansen & Mathias Clasen
2021. Pandemic practice: Horror fans and morbidly curious individuals are more psychologically resilient during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences 168 ► pp. 110397 ff.
Wimmer, Lena, Stacie Friend, Gregory Currie & Heather J. Ferguson
2021. Reading Fictional Narratives to Improve Social and Moral Cognition: The Influence of Narrative Perspective, Transportation, and Identification. Frontiers in Communication 5
Morin, Olivier, Alberto Acerbi & Oleg Sobchuk
2019. Why people die in novels: testing the ordeal simulation hypothesis. Palgrave Communications 5:1
Morin, Olivier, Alberto Acerbi & Oleg Sobchuk
2022. Perché si muore nei romanzi: l’ipotesi della simulazione dell’ordalia. In La narrazione come incontro [Moderna/Comparata, 41], ► pp. 59 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.