Article published In:
The Northumbrian Old English glosses
Edited by Elly van Gelderen
[NOWELE 72:2] 2019
► pp. 220244
References (36)
References
Berndt, R. 1956. Form und Funktion des Verbums im nördlichen Spätaltenglischen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Boer, R. C. 1920. Oudnoorsch Handboek. Haarlem: Willink.Google Scholar
Bremmer, R. H. 2009. An introduction to Old Frisian. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brook, G. & R. Leslie (eds.). 1963. Layamon: Brut. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brookes, S. 2016. The shape of things to come? Variation and intervention in Aldred’s gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 103–150. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2018. Where did THEY come from? A native origin for THEY, THEIR, THEM. Diachronica 35(2). 165–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DOE. Dictionary of Old English (DOE) texts. [URL]
Faarlund, J. 2004. The syntax of Old Norse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Facsimile 2002. The Lindisfarne Bible. Munich: Faksimile Verlag.Google Scholar
Filppula, M., J. Klemola & H. Paulasto. 2008. English and Celtic in contact. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. Introduction [this issue]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R. M. 2004. North Northumbrian and South Northumbrian: A geographical statement? In M. Dossena & R. Lass (eds.), Methods and data in English historical dialectology, 241–255. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Irslinger, B. 2014. Intensifiers and reflexives in SAE, Insular Celtic and English. Indogermanische Forschungen 1191. 159–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Reflexive marking in English and Welsh: The “contact hypothesis” revisited. ICEHL 30 presentation.Google Scholar
Janssen, H. 1957. Historische Grammatica van het Latijn II. Den Haag: Servire.Google Scholar
Klemola, J. 2013. English as a contact language in the British Isles. In D. Schreier & M. Hundt (eds.), English as a contact language, 75–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
König, E. & L. Vezzosi. 2004. The role of predicate meaning in the development of reflexivity. In W. Bisang et al. (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? 213–244. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lange, C. 2006. Reflexivity and intensification in English. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Lea, E. M. 1894. The language of the Northumbrian gloss to the Gospel of St. Mark, Anglia 161. 62–206.Google Scholar
Miller, G. D. 2012. External influences on English: From its beginnings to the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. & A. H. Marckwardt. 1951. Historical outlines of English sounds and inflections. Ann Arbor, MI: Wahr.Google Scholar
Ogura, M. 1989. Verbs with the reflexive pronoun and constructions with ‘self’ in Old and Early Middle English. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Parry, J. 1937. Brut y Brenhinedd. Cambridge: The Medieval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Pons-Sanz, S. 2013. The lexical effects of Anglo-Scandinavian linguistic contact on Old English. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poppe, E. 2009. Standard Average European and the Celticity of English intensifiers and reflexives: Some considerations and implications. English Language and Linguistics 131. 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quak, A. 1992. Formenlehre des Altniederländischen. In R. Bremmer & A. Quak (eds), Zur Phonologie und Morphologie des Altniederländischen, 81–123. Odense: Odense University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, P. 2011. Old British. In E. Ternes (ed.), Brythonic Celtic – Britannisches Keltisch: From Medieval British to Modern Breton, 1–84. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (ed.) 1871–87. The Gospel according to St. Matthew, St. Mark, St. Luke and St. John. Reprint: Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, R. 1946. A grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Tristram, H. L. C. 1999. How Celtic is Standard English? The Annual Celtic Lecture, St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. 2013. Concerning myself . In R. Mailhammer (ed.), Lexical and structural etymology: Beyond word histories, 121–146. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vezzosi, L. 2005. The development of himself in Middle English: A ‘Celtic’ Hypothesis. In N. Ritt & H. Schendl (eds.), Rethinking Middle English: Linguistic and literary approaches, 228–43. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Visser, F. 1963. An historical syntax of the English grammar, Vol I1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kiss, Katalin É. & Nikolett Mus
2022. The reflexive cycle. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Cuesta, Julia & Nieves Rodríguez-Ledesma
2020. Reduced forms in the nominal morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospel Gloss. A case of accusative/dative syncretism?. Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.