Article published In:
Vol. 73:2 (2020) ► pp.252275


Barnes, M.
1992Norse in the British Isles. In A. Faulkes & R. Perkins (eds.), Viking revaluations. Viking Society centenary symposium 14–15 May 1992, 65–84. London: Viking Society for Northern Research.Google Scholar
Baetke, W.
2006Wörterbuch zur altnordischen Prosaliteratur. Digital. Edited by H. Fix et al. Greifswald: Universität Greifswald. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
Benediktsson, H.
1961The earliest Germanic phonology. Lingua 101. 237–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, I.
2016A note on the relationship between Scandinavian and Low German. Journal of Historial Sociolinguistics 2(2). 189–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, J. & T. N. Toller
1955An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Based on the manuscript collections of Joseph Bosworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, K.
2002Semicommunication and accommodation: Observations from the linguistic situation in Scandinavia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12(1). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Semi-communication and beyond. Some results of the Hamburg Hanseatic Project (1990–1995). In L. Elemevik & E. H. Jahr (eds.), Contact between Low German and Scandiavian in the Late Middle Ages. 25 years of research, 75–94. Stockholm: Kungl. Gustav Adolfs Akademien för Svensk folkkultur.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J.
1996Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J. & L. K. Arnovick
2017The English language: A linguistic history, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunner, K.
1965Altenglische Grammatik: Nach der angelsächsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers, 3rd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A.
1959Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Coates, R.
2006Behind the dictionary-forms of Scandinavian elements in England. Journal of the English Place-Name Society 381. 43–61.Google Scholar
Cole, M.
2018A native origin for Present-Day English they, their, them . Diachronica 35(2). 165–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czaykowksa-Higgins, E. & M. D. Kinkade
1998Salish languages and linguistics. In E. Czaykowksa-Higgins & M. D. Kinkade (eds.), Salish languages and linguistics. Theoretical and descriptive perspectives, 1–68. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, G.
2006Comparative syntax of Old English and Old Icelandic. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Delsing, L.-O. & K. L. Åkeson
2005Håller språket ihop Norden? En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska, svenska och norska. Copenhagen: Nordiska Ministerrådet. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DOE = Cameron, A., A. Crandell Amos, A. diPaolo Healey et al.
2018Dictionary of Old English: A to I online. Retrieved from [URL]
Downey, S., G. Sun & G. Kondrak
2017Alignment of Phonetic Sequences Using the ‘ALINE’ Algorithm (AlineR). R.Google Scholar
Downey, S., G. Sun & P. Norquest
2017AlineR: An R package for optimizing feature-weighted alignments and linguistic distances. The R Journal 9(1). 138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durkin, P.
2014Borrowed words: A history of loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fjalldal, M.
1993How valid is the Anglo-Scandinavian language passage in Gunnlaug’s Saga as historical evidence? Neophilologus 771. 601–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleming, R.
2010Britain after Rome. The fall and rise, 400–1070. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Foote, P. G.
1974Gunnlaugssaga ormstungu. London: Viking Society for Northern Research.Google Scholar
Forte, A., R. D. Oram & F. Pedersen
2005Viking empires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gooskens, C. & W. Heeringa
2004The position of Frisian in the Germanic language area. In D. Gilbers, M. Schreuder & N. Knevel (eds.), On the boundaries of phonology and phonetics, 61–87. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Gooskens, C.
2006Linguistic and extra-Linguistic Predictors of inter-Scandinavian intelligibility. Linguistics in the Netherlands 231. 101–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007The contribution of linguistic factors to the intelligibility of closely related languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28(6). 445–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haas, W.
2014Sprache in Variation – und warum sich die Deutschschweizer trotzdem verstehen. In E. Glaser, A. Kolmer, M. Meyer & E. Stark (eds.), Sprache(n) verstehen, 127–150. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.Google Scholar
Hadley, D.
2002Viking and native: Re-thinking identity in the Danelaw. Early Medieval Europe 11(1). 45–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagland, J. R.
2000 “Alls vér erum einnar tungu” – igjen: Språkhistorisk realitet eller litterært topos? Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 221. 107–112.Google Scholar
Harðarson, G.
1999 “Alls vér erum einnar tungu”. Um skyldleika ensku og íslensku í Fyrstu málfræðiritgerðinni. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 211. 11–30.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. & U. Tadmor
2009The Loanword Typology Project and the World Loanword Database. In M. Haspalmath & U. Tadmor (eds.). Loanwords in the world’s languages. A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E.
1966Semicommunication: The language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry 36(2). 280–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heeringa, W.
2004Measuring dialect pronunciation differences using Levensthein Distance. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Heusler, A.
1932Altisländisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
van Heuven, V. J.
2008Making sense of strange sounds: (Mutual) intelligibility of related language varieties. A review. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2(1–2). 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higham, N. J. & M. J. Ryan
2013The Anglo-Saxon world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hines, J.
1990Philology, archaeology and the adventus Saxonum vel Anglorum. In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 17–36. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M.
1992A grammar of Old English. Volume 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association
2013Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet, 14th print edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. B.
1989On the Mutual Intelligibility of Spanish and Portuguese. Hispania 72(4). 848–852. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirchmeier, S. & E. S. Jansen
2016Nordisk sprogforståelse og kommunikationsstrategier. Sprog i Norden 2016, 61–78.Google Scholar
Kondrak, G.
2000A new algorithm for the alignment of phonetic sequences. Proceedings of the first meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference, 288–295. N.p.: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
2002Algorithms for language reconstruction. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Kondrak, G. & T. Sherif
2006Evaluation of several phonetic similarity algorithms on the task of cognate identification. In J. Nerbonne & E. Hinrichs (eds.), Proceedings of the COLING-ACL Workshop on Linguistic Distances, 43–50. Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B.
1983An overview of sequence comparison: Time warps, string edits, and Macromolecules. SIAM Review 25(2). 201–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, R.
1994Old English. A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavelle, R.
2010Alfred’s wars. Sources and interpretations of Anglo-Saxon warfare in the Viking Age. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Levenshtein, V. I.
1966Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10(8). 707–710.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D.
2006An imperial possession. Britain in the Roman Empire. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.
1999What constitutes a basic vocabulary for spoken communication? Studies in English Language and Literature 11. 233–249.Google Scholar
Moulton, W. G.
1988Mutual intelligibility among speakers of early Germanic dialects. In D. G. Calder & T. C. Christy (eds.), Germania. Comparative studies in the Old Germanic languages and literatures, 9–28. Wolfeboro, NH: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Nedoma, R.
2006Kleine Grammatik des Altisländischen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Nesse, A.
2002Språkkontakt mellon norsk og tysk i hansatidens Bergen. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
2012Norwegian and German in Bergen. In L. Elemevik & E. H. Jahr (eds.), Contact between Low German and Scandiavian in the Late Middle Ages. 25 Years of Research, 95–112. Uppsala: Kungl. Gustav Adolfs Akademien för svensk folkkultur.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. F.
2015The vowel systems of Old English, Old Norse and Old High German compared. In J. O. Aksedal & H. F. Nielsen (eds.), Early Germanic languages in contact, 261–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noreen, A.
1970Altnordische Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K.
1932Basic English. A general introduction with rules and grammar, 2nd edn. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pagel, M., Q. D. Atkinson & A. Meade
2007Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature 449(11). 717–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. D.
2000Viking Age England. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. W.
1992Old English and its closest relatives. A Survey of the earliest Germanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sağın-Şimşek, Ç. & W. König
2011Receptive multilingualism and language understanding: Intelligibility of Azerbaijani to Turkish speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 16(3). 315–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salway, P.
1981Roman Britain. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Sawyer, B. & P. Sawyer
1993Medieval Scandinavia: From conversion to reformation, circa 800–1500. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schrijver, P.
2014Language contact and the origin of Germanic languages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swadesh, M.
1950Salish internal relationships. International Journal of American Linguistics 16(4). 157–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swan, M.
2001Authorship and anonymity. In P. Pulsiano & E. Treharne (eds.), A companion to Anglo-Saxon literature, 71–83. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tadmor, U., M. Haspelmath & B. Taylor
2010Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica 21(2). 226–246.Google Scholar
Toon, T. E.
1992Old English dialects. In R. M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, 421–426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Townend, M.
2002Language and history in Viking Age England. Linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. & E. M. Wright
1982Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Fox, Susan, Anthony Grant & Laura Wright
2023. Contact Theory and the History of English. In Medieval English in a Multilingual Context [New Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, ],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Walkden, George, Juhani Klemola & Thomas Rainsford
2023. An Overview of Contact-Induced Morphosyntactic Changes in Early English. In Medieval English in a Multilingual Context [New Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, ],  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.