Part of
Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability TheoryEdited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 45–70
Edited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 45–70
Chapter 3. The emergence of sentence Topic in a Topicprominent language
A descriptive study of L2 Chinese
The present study investigates the L2 developmental course of the sentence Topic in a Topic-prominent language – Mandarin Chinese. It examines the structural, the semantic and the discourse-pragmatic aspects of the Topic development, thereby focusing on the word order, the semantic feature of definiteness and the information status of the Topic in the L2 speech data of three adult L2 Mandarin learners of English background. The results show that the structural development of the Topic begins with the canonical order in which the Topic is identified with the Subject, and progresses toward the non-canonical order in which the Topic role is taken by the Object. Although the Topic element is largely encoded with the [+definite] feature, there is evidence to suggest a general lack of awareness for the semantic requirements for the Topic, as well as issues in the understanding of the contextual contrast between the Subject-topic and the Object-topic structures such as the ba-Object construction.
References (28)
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Chao, Y-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Chen, R. (1995). Communicative dynamism and word order in Mandarin Chinese. Language Science, 17(2), 201-222. 
Cole, P. (1987). Null object in Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 597-612.
Gao, X-D. (2005). Noun phrase morphemes and topic development in L2 Mandarin Chinese: A processability perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.
Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 instruction. AILA Review, 19, 18-41.
Huang, C-T.J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531-574.
Jiang, W. (2013). A look at the word order in spoken Mandarin: A quantitative study. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Canberra.
Jin, H.G. (1994). Topic-prominence and Subject-prominence in L2 acquisition: Evidence of English-to-Chinese typological transfer. Language Learning, 44(1), 101-122.
Jung, H.J. (2004). Topic and Subject prominence in interlanguage development. Language Learning, 54(4), 713-738.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: CUP.
LaPolla, R.J. (1995). Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In P. Dowing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in Chinese (pp. 297-329). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2009). Chinese as a topic-comment (not topic-prominent and not SVO) language. In J. Xing (Ed.), Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches (pp. 9-22). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1975). The semantic function of word order in Chinese. In C. Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp. 163-195). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457-490). New York, NY: Academic Press.
. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Liu, X., Deng, E., & Liu, S. (1991). Practical Chinese reader (1 & 2). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Peltomaa, M. (2006). Pragmatic nature of Mandarin passive-like constructions. In W. Abraham & L. Leisio (Eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function (pp. 83-114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending processability theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp.199-252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Hakansson, G. (2005). Processability, typological distance and L1 transfer. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 85-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sun, C-F., & Givón, T. (1985). On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language, 61, 329-351.
Xu, L. (1986). Free empty category. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 75-93.
Xu, L., & Langendoen, T. (1985). Topic structures in Chinese. Language, 61, 1-27.
Yuan, B. (1995). Acquisition of based-generated topics by English-speaking learners of Chinese. Language Learning, 45, 567-603.
Zhang, Y. (2007). Testing the topic hypothesis: The L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Zhao, X. (2011). The syntax and interpretation of embedded null subjects in Chinese, and their acquisition by English-speaking learners. EUROSLA Yearbook, 11, 191–217.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Liu, Bo, Bruno Di Biase & Satomi Kawaguchi
2023. The development of lexical mapping in Chinese L2. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 63 ff. 
Baten, Kristof
2019. Teaching the German case system. In Widening Contexts for Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 7], ► pp. 301 ff.
Zhang, Yanyin
2019. Discourse-pragmatic conditions for Object topicalisation structures in early L2
Chinese. In Widening Contexts for Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 7], ► pp. 207 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.