Part of
Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory
Edited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 169174
References (8)
References
Bowden, H.W, Steinhauer, K. Sanz, C., & Ullman, M.T. (2013). Native-like processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2492-2511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, O., & Wei, L (2013). Translanguaging. Language, bilingualism and education. Houndmills: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C.N. (2008). Processing strategies and the comprehension of sentence-level input by L2 learners of German. System, 36, 388-406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2. A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 49–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Håkansson, G. (2005). Processing constraints on L1 transfer. In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.128-153). Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 367-382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & Warren, T. (2010). Beginning adult L2 learners’ sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations: A self-paced reading study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychcology, 22(7), 1092-1107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A Usage-based Theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar