Cover not available
Part of
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 9–26

Chapter 1
Research timeline. The role of instruction

Teachability and processability

ORCID logo | Ghent University
| Ludwigsburg University of Education
This chapter presents an overview of studies that have dealt with the role of instruction, and more particularly, its possible effect on altering the route of second language acquisition (SLA). In SLA, some have argued that the effects of instruction are limited, in that instruction will promote acquisition only if it occurs at a time when a learner is ‘ready’ for the forms instructed. One formalisation of this idea of learner readiness is Pienemann’s (1984) teachability hypothesis. The present timeline will discuss studies preceding the formulation of the teachability hypothesis as well as subsequent studies that confirm, adjust, challenge or refute it. The aim is to give a historical overview of findings relating to this research question, which remains significant and relevant today.
Published online: 6 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.6.01bat
References (33)
References
Abrahamsson, N. 2013. Developmental sequences. In Routledge Encyclopedia of SLA, P. Robinson (ed.), 173–177. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical-functional Syntax. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dallaway, M. 1994. The teachability hypothesis and the language learning classroom. Working Papers in Language Education 2: 15–20.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds). 1998. Focus on Form in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. 2011. Implicit and explicit knowledge and their interfaces. In Implicit and Explicit Language Learning. Conditions, Processes, and Knowledge in SLA and Bilingualism, C. Sanz & R. P. Leow (eds), 35–47. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jansen, L. 2008. Acquisition of German word order in tutored learners: A cross-sectional study in a wider theoretical context. Language Learning 58: 185–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–100.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. & Trovimovich, P. 2016. Research timeline: Second language communication strategies. Language Teaching 49: 494–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keßler, J.-U. 2006. Englischerwerb im Anfangsunterricht diagnostizieren. Linguistische Profilanalysen am Übergang von der Primarstufe in die Sekundarstufe I. Tübingen: NarrGoogle Scholar
2007. Assessing EFL-development online: A feasibility study of Rapid Profile. In Second Language Acquisition Research. Theory-construction and Testing, F. Mansouri (ed.), 119–143. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2008. Communicative tasks and second language profiling: Linguistic and pedagogical implications. In Research on Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Theoretical, Methodological and Pedagogical Perspectives, J. Eckerth & S. Siepmann (eds), 291–310. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Keßler, J.-U. & Liebner, M. 2011. Diagnosing L2 development. In Studying Processability Theory: An Introductory Textbook, [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 1], M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (eds), 133–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. 1998. The importance of timing in Focus on Form. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), 177–196. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. 2014 Introduction to Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Long, M. 1991. Focus on Form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective, K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (eds), 196–221. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Pienemann, M. & Thornton, I. 1991. Rapid Profile: A second language screening procedure. Language and language education. Working Papers of the National Languages Institute of Australia 1: 61–82.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. 1987. Theories of Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. 2013. Development in second language acquisition. In Routledge Encyclopaedia of SLA, P. Robinson (ed.), 165–173. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. 2016. Research timeline: Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. Language Teaching 49: 35–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. 2007. An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics 28: 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. 2007. Time, teachers, and tasks in focus on form instruction. In Form-focused Instruction and Teacher Education, S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (eds), 161–176. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1984. Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6: 186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. Assessing Second Language Acquisition Through Rapid Profile. Ms, Sydney.Google Scholar
1998. Language Processing and Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Keßler, J.-U. 2012. Processability Theory. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds), 228–246. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 2015. An outline of Processability Theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning 65: 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. H. 1978. The Pidginization Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10: 209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. 2013. Instructed second language acquisition. In Routledge Encyclopaedia of SLA, P. Robinson (ed.), 319–327. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, J. & Evans, J. 1998. What kind of focus and on which forms? In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), 139–155. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Rodríguez-Castro, Mónica & Concepción B. Godev
2024. Implicit agent se-constructions. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 628 ff. DOI logo
Di Biase, Bruno
2022. Processability approaches to second language instruction. Instructed Second Language Acquisition DOI logo
Keßler, Jörg-U
2022. Teaching processability theory in foreign language teacher education. Instructed Second Language Acquisition DOI logo
Keßler, Jörg‐U. & Anke Lenzing
2022. Grammar in Foreign and Second Language Classes. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.