Chapter 5
The elicitation of oral language production data
An exploration of the Elicited Imitation Task
To determine developmental stages, research based on the framework of Processability Theory (PT) commonly examines data from naturally occurring speech. This chapter will investigate whether experimentally elicited data can also be used as a valid basis for determining developmental stages. It reports on a study that tested predictions derived from PT regarding developmental stages of case markers in L2 German. The results show that data obtained from an Elicited Imitation Task (EIT) yields the same developmental order, as well as variation, that has previously been found in naturally occurring data. The study therefore suggests that the EIT affords a valid method to examine developmental stages. Positive and negative aspects of the elicited imitation task will be considered.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The EIT: Procedure
- 3.Methodological challenge: Topicalization and functional case use in L2 German
- 4.The study
- Participants
- Data elicitation task
- Results
- 5.Pros and cons of the EIT
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (51)
References
Arnett, C. & Jernigan, H. 2014. A cognitive grammar account of case for L2 students of German. German as a Foreign Language 15: 68–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Artoni, D. & Magnani, M. 2013. LFG contributions in second language acquisition research: The development of case in L2 Russian. In Proceedings of the LFG13 Conference, M. Butt & T. Holloway King (eds), 69–89. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S. & Papagno, C. 1998. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review 105: 158–173. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baten, K. 2015. Methodologische Herausforderungen der empirischen fremdsprachenerwerbs-forschung am Beispiel des Kasuserwerbs: Die „Elicited Imitation Task“. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung 26: 161–181.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baten, K. & Lochtman, K. 2014. Das deutsche Kasussystem im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Ein Forschungsüberblick. Muttersprache 124: 1–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bittner, D. 2006. Case before gender in the acquisition of German. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 40: 115–134. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bley-Vroman, R. & Chaudron, C. 1994. Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition, E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (eds), 245–261. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowles, M. 2011. Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 247–271. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chaudron, C., Ngyuen, H. & Prior, M. 2005. Manual for the Vietnamese elicited imitation test. National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i, 1–33.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diehl, E., Christen, H., Leuenberger, S., Pelvat, I. & Studer, T. 2000. Grammatikunterricht: Alles für der Katz? Untersuchungen zum Zweitsprachenerwerb Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisenbeiß, S., Bartke, S. & Clahsen, H. 2005. Structural and lexical case in child German: Evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics 13: 3–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. 2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 141–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. 2008. Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18: 4–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erlam, R. 2006. Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics 27: 464–491. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, K. 2010. Kodiert das Deutsche funktional? Mythen, Fakten, Sprachvergleich und Deutsch als Fremdsprache. In Valenz und Deutsch als Fremdsprache, K. Fischer, E. Fobbe, S. Schierholz (eds), 13–40. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glaboniat, M., Müller, M., Rusch, P. & Wertenschlag, L. 2005. Profile Deutsch: Gemeinsamer europäischer Referenzrahmen: Lernzielbestimmungen; Kannbeschreibungen; Kommunikative Mittel; Niveau A1-A2. B1-B2. C1-C2. Berlin: Langenscheidt.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, C. R., Lonsdale, D., Kennington, C., Johnson, A. & McGhee, J. 2008. Elicited imitation as an oral proficiency measure with asr scoring. Proceedings of LREC 2008, Marrakech (Morocco). 1604–1610.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Håkansson, G. 2012. The emergence criterion. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, P. Robinson (ed.), 213–214. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulstijn, J. H., Alderson, J. C. & Schoonen, R. 2010. Developmental stages in second-language acquisition and levels of second-language proficiency: Are there links between them? In Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and Language Testing Research [Eurosla Monographs Series 1], I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (eds), 11–20. Paris: Eurosla.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., & Tomita, Y. 2007. Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Canadian Modern Language Review 64: 215–238. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaplan, T. I. 1996. Elicited limitation tasks in L2 acquisition research: Lessons from native speakers. Ms, University of Iowa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keatinge, D. & Keßler, J.-U. 2009. The acquisition of the passive voice in L2-English: Perception and production. In Research in Second Language Acquisition: Empirical Evidence across Languages, J.-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (eds), 67–92. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keßler, J.-U. 2006. Englischerwerb im Anfangsunterricht diagnostizieren. Linguistische Profilanalysen und der Übergang von der Primar- in die Sekundarstufe I [Giessener Beiträge zur Fremdsprachendidaktik]. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keßler, J.-U. 2007. Assessing EFL-development online: A feasibility study of Rapid Profile. In Second Language Acquisition Research. Theory-construction and Testing, F. Mansouri (ed.), 119–143. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keßler, J.-U. & Schwab, G. 2015. PT meets CA: Second language research at the crossroads. In Theoretical Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4], K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman & M. Van Herreweghe (eds), 175–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loebell, H. & Bock, K. 2003. Structural priming across languages. Linguistics 41: 791–824. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marx, N. 2014. Kasuszuweisung und Kasuslehre bei Schülern mit Migrationshintergrund: Eine differenzierte Betrachtung. In Zweitspracherwerb im Jugendalter, B. Ahrenholz & P. Grommes (eds), 99–124. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDade, H., Simpson, M. & Lamb, D. 1982. The use of elicited imitation as a measure of expressive grammar: A question of validity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 47: 19–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T. & McLeod, B. 1983. Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning 33: 135–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Motsch, H.-J. & Riehemann, S. 2008. Grammatische Störungen mehrsprachiger Schüler. Interventionsstudie zum Therapieziel Kasus. Die Sprachheilarbeit 53: 15–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munnich, E., Flynn, S. & Martohardjono, G. 1994. Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks; what they measure and how they relate to each other. In Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition, E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (eds), 227–243. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pallotti, G. 2007. An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics 28: 361–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. & Mackey, A. 1993. An empirical study of children’s ESL development and Rapid Profile. In ESL Development. Language and Literacy in Schools, Vol. 2, P. McKay (ed.), 115–259. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia and National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sachs, J. 1967. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics 2: 437–442. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scheepers, C. & Corley, M. 2000. Syntactic priming in German sentence production. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, L. Gleitman & A. Joshi (eds), 435–440. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spada, N., Shiu, J. L. J. & Tomita, Y. 2015. Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning 65: 723–751. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szagun, G. 2004. Learning by ear: On the acquisition of case and gender marking by German- speaking children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants. Journal of Child Language 31: 1–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thielmann, W. 2007. Fallstudie: Kasus in Sprachtheorie und Sprachvermittlung. Zielsprache Deutsch 34: 11–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tracy-Ventura, N., McManus, K., Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. 2013. “Repeat as much as you can”: Elicited imitation as a measure of global proficiency in L2 French. In Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, P. Leclercq, H. Hilton & A. Edmonds (eds), 143–166. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomita, Y., Suzuki, W. & Jessop, L. 2009. Elicited imitation: Toward valid procedures to measure implicit second language grammatical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly 43, 345–350. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B. 2004. Input processing in second language acquisition. In Processing Instruction. Theory, Research, and Commentary, B. VanPatten (ed.), 5–31. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vinther, T. 2002. Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12: 54–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wu, S.-L. & Ortega, L. 2013. Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals 46: 680–704. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winkler, S. 2011. Sprachstandsermittlung und Lernfortschrittstest mal anders. Die “Elicited Imitation Task” als ein Fenster zur lernersprachlichen Grammatik. Info DaF 5: 225–250.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yan, X., Maeda, Y., Lv, J. & Ginther, A. 2016. Elicited imitation as a measure of second language proficiency: A narrative review and meta-analysis. Language Testing 33: 497–528. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Baten, Kristof & Aaricia Ponnet
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.