Part of
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 137159
Albrechtsen, D., Henriksen, B. & Faerch, C.
1980Native speaker reactions to learners’ spoken interlanguage 1. Language Learning 30(2): 365–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Axelsson, M.
1994Noun Phrase Development in Swedish as a Second Language. A Study of Adult Learners Acquiring Definiteness and the Semantics and Morphology of Adjectives. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F.
1990Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. & Cohen, A. D.
1998Language testing – SLA interfaces: An update. In Interfaces between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research, L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen (eds), 1–31. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S.
2010Language Assessment in Practice: Developing Language Assessments and Justifying their Use in the Real World. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baten, K. & Håkansson, G.
2015The development of subordinate clauses in German and Swedish as L2s: A theoretical and methodological comparison. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37: 517–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulté, B. & Housen, A.
2012Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA [Language Learning & Language Teaching 32], A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds), 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R. & Hulstijn, J. H.
2012Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34(1): 5–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckes, T.
2009Many-facets Rasch measurement. In Reference Supplement to the Manual for Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Language: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (Section H), S. Takala (ed.), 1–52. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Eklund Heinonen, M.
2009Processbarhet på Prov: Bedömning av Muntlig Språkfärdighet hos Vuxna Andraspråksinlärare (Processability in Tests: Assessment of Oral Proficiency in Adult Second Language Learners). PhD dissertation, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
2008Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1): 4–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G.
2005Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
FIFA = Fédération Internationale de Football Association
2014/2015Laws of the Game. Zurich: Fédération Internationale de Football Association.Google Scholar
Flyman Mattsson, A. & Håkansson, G.
2010Bedömning av Svenska som Andraspråk: En Analysmodell Baserad på Grammatiska Utvecklingsstadier (Assessing Second Language Swedish: An Analytical Model Based on Grammatical Developmental Stages). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
2014Swedex: Swedish examinations. [URL]> (3 September 2014).
2010Swedex B2 – Kriterier – Tala 2010-12-20. Kommentarer till bedömningskriterierna för muntlig uppgift [Swedex B2 – Criteria – Speaking 20 December 2010. Comments to the assessing criteria for the speaking task]. [URL]> (1 May 2014).
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A. & Wigglesworth, G.
2000Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reason. Applied Linguistics 21(3): 354–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fulcher, G.
2003Testing Second Language Speaking. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2000The ‘communicative’ legacy in language testing. System 28: 483–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A. & Lund, K.
2001Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 389–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granfeldt, J. & Ågren, M.
2013Stages of processability and levels of proficiency in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. The case of L3 French. In Language Acquisition and Use in Multilingual Contexts: Theory and Practice, A. Flyman Mattsson & C. Norrby (eds), 28–38. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Green, A.
2014Exploring Language Assessment and Testing: Language in Action. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gyllstad, H., Granfeldt, H., Bernardini, P. & Källkvist, M.
2014Linguistic correlates to communicative proficiency levels of the CEFR. In Eurosla Yearbook 14, L. Roberts, I. Vedder & J. H. Hulstjin (eds), 1–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B. & Viberg, Å.
1977The place-holder constraint, language typology, and teaching of Swedish to immigrants. Studia Linguistica 31: 106–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helsen, W., Gilis, B. & Weston, M.
2006Errors in judging “offside” in association football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences 24(5): 521–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I.
2012Complexity, accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurements and research. In Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA [Language Learning & Language Teaching 32], A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H.
2007The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 91(4): 663–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Schoonen, R., De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P. & Florijn, A.
2011Linguistic competences of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Language (CEFR). Language Testing 29(2): 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K.
1978Variation in Interlanguage Syntax. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
1972On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics, J. Pride & J. Holmes (eds), 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T. & O’Hagan, S.
2008Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 24–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jin, T. & Mak, B.
2013Distinguishing features in scoring L2 Chinese speaking performance: How do they work? Language Testing 30(1): 23–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jin, T., Mak, B. & Zhou, P.
2012Confidence scoring of speaking performance: How does fuzziness become exact? Language Testing 29(1): 43–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I.
2014Raters’ decisions, rating procedures, and rating scales. Language Testing 31(3): 279–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luoma, S.
2004Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Martin, M.
2013The complex simple: A problematic adjective in the CEFR writing scales. Nordand 8(2): 63–86.Google Scholar
Martin, M., Mustonen, S., Reiman, N., & Seilonen, M.
2010On becoming an independent user. In Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and Language Testing Research [Eurosla Monographs Series 1], I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (eds), 57–79. Paris: Eurosla.Google Scholar
Norris, J. & Ortega, L.
2009Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philipsson, A.
2007Interrogative Clauses and Verb Morphology in L2 Swedish. Theoretical Interpretations of Grammatical Development and Effects of Different Elicitation Techniques. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
1998Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Håkansson, G.
1999A unified approach toward the development of Swedish as L2. A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 383–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C.
2001The vulnerable C-domain. Brain and Language 77: 364–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2015R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: [URL]
RStudio Team
2015RStudio: Integrated Development for R. R Studio. Boston MA. [URL]
Salameh, E.-K., Håkansson, G. & Nettelbladt, U.
1996The acquisition of Swedish as a second language in a group of Arabic-speaking pre-school children: Word order pattern and phrasal morphology. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 21(3–4): 163–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandlund, E. & Sundqvist, P.
2014Provuppgiftshantering som social praktik: En jämförelse mellan interaktionsanalys och bedömardata för muntligt prov i engelska (Task management as a social practise: A comparison between interaction analysis and assessment data from an English speaking test). In Språk i Undervisning: Rapport från ASLA:s Vårsymposium, Linköping, 11–12 maj 2012 (Language in teaching. Proceedings from ASLA’s spring symposium, Linköping, May 11–12, 2012), C. Rosén, P. Simfors & A.-K. Sundberg (eds), 125–138. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
1998A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Spoelman, M. & Verspoor, M.
2010Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 532–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomita, Y. & Spada, N.
2013Form-focused instruction and learner investment in L2 communication. The Modern Language Journal 97(3): 591–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonkyn, A.
2012Measuring and perceiving change in oral complexity, accuracy and fluency. Examining instructed learners’ short-term gains. In Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA [Language Learning & Language Teaching 32], A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Moere, A.
2012A psycholinguistic approach to oral language assessment. Language Testing 29(3): 325–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Å.
1990Bisatser i inlärarperspektiv (Sub-clauses from the learners’ perspective). In Andra Symposiet i Svenska som Andraspråk i Göteborg 1989 (The second symposium for Swedish as a second language in Gothenburg 1989), G. Tingbjörn (ed.), 338–362. Stockholm: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Watkins, M. W. & Pacheco, M.
2001Interobserver agreement in behavioral research: Importance and calculation. Journal of Behavioral Education 10(4): 205–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wijers, M.
2015Forgotten factors in the development of dependent clauses in Swedish as a second language. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 95: 33–43.Google Scholar