Part of
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 183204
Akita, K., Matsumoto, Y. & Ohara, K.
2010Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron ni okeru tyokuziteki keiro-hyoogen to yootai-goi-repaatorii (Deictic path expressions and manner lexicon in the typology of motion expressions). In Lexicon Forum 5, T. Kageyama (ed.), 1–22. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. & Slobin, D. I.
1994Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T.
2004Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching, M. Achard & S. Niemeier (eds), 13–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Motion in Danish as a second language: Does the learner’s L1 make a difference? In Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking, Z. Han & T. Cadierno (eds), 1–33. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. & Lund, K.
2004Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In Form-meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition, B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott & M. Overstreet (eds), 139–154. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. & Robinson, R.
Eguchi, K.
2017Hangari-go ni okeru ido-hyogen (Motion expressions in Hungarian). In Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron (Typology of Linguistic Expressions for Motion Events), Y. Matsumoto (ed.), 39–64. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, H. & Hickmann, M.
2011Expressing voluntary motion in a second language: English learners of French. In Language and Bilingual Cognition, V. Cook & B. Bassetti (eds), 315–339. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Inagaki, S.
2001Motion verbs with goal PPs in the L2 acquisition of English and Japanese. SSLA 23: 153–170.Google Scholar
2010Comparing Chinese and English speakers in the L2 acquisition of Japanese motion expressions. Chuugokugo-washa no tameno nihongo kyooiku kenkyuu 1: 28–40.Google Scholar
Jessen, M. & Cadierno, T.
2013Variation in the categorization of motion in L2 Danish by German and Turkish native speakers. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41], J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (eds), 133–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koga, H., Koloskova, Y., Mizuno, M. & Aoki, Y.
2008Expressions of spatial motion events in English, German, and Russian: With special reference to Japanese. In Typological Studies of the Linguistic Expression of Motion Events, Vol. II: A Contrastive Study of Japanese, French, English, Russian, German and Chinese: Norwegian Wood, C. Lamarre, T. Ohori, & T. Morita (eds), 13–44. Tokyo: 21st Century COE Program Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences at the University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A. & Narasimhan, B.
(eds) 2012Events of “Putting” and “Taking”: A Crosslinguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 100]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mano, M., Yoshinari, Y. & Eguchi, K.
2014The effects of the first language on the description of motion events: Focusing on L2 Japanese learners of English and Hungarian. The Proceedings of the Sixth CLS International Conference, 227–299, Singapore 4–6 December.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
1997Kuukan-idoo no gengo-hyoogen to sono kakutyoo (Linguistic expressions of space and their extension). In Kuukan to idoo no hyoogen (Expressions of Space and Motion), Y. Matsumoto & S. Tanaka (eds), 125–230. Tokyo: Kenkyuusya.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2017Idoo-hyoogen no ruikei (Typology of linguistic expressions for motion events). Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. A.
2001Agentive verbs of manner of motion in Spanish and English as second languages. SSLA 23: 171–206.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories [Typological Studies in Language 66], M. Hickmann & S. Robert (eds), 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spring, R. & Horie, K.
2013How cognitive typology affects second language acquisition: A study of Japanese and Chinese learners of English. Cognitive Linguistics 24: 689–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization. Via aspect and results. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, K. Hubbard (ed.), 17: 480–519. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yoshinari, Y.
2015Describing motion events in Japanese L2 acquisition: How to express deictic information. In New Horizons in the Study of Motion: Bringing Together Applied and Theoretical Perspectives, I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano & A. Hijazo-Gascón (eds), 32–63. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Yoshinari, Y., Eguchi, K., Mano, M. & Matsumoto, Y.
2016Daini-gengo ni okeru ido- zisyoo no gengo-ka: Nihongo-wasya ga motiiru eigo to hangarigo no kenkyuu (A study of the descriptions of motion events by Japanese learners of English and Hungarian). Studies in Language Sciences 15: 142–174. Tokyo: Kaitakusya.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Spring, Ryan & Naoyuki Ono
2024. Creating an automated tool to assist with event-conflation studies: An explanation and argument for its importance. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:1  pp. 100054 ff. DOI logo
von Stutterheim, Christiane, Johannes Gerwien, Abassia Bouhaous, Mary Carroll & Monique Lambert
2020. What makes up a reportable event in a language? Motion events as an important test domain in linguistic typology. Linguistics 58:6  pp. 1659 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.