Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B.
(2015) Processability Theory: Theoretical bases and universal schedules. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (pp. 19–79). Paris: The European Second Language Acquisition Association.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H.
(2015) Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development be? Language Learning 65(1), 210–232. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3(2), 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H.
(1984) ‘To be’ or not ‘to be’, is that really the question? Developmental sequences and the role of the copula in the acquisition of German as a second language. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 299–317). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., & Starks, D.
(2014) Language education and applied linguistics: Bridging the two fields. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2), 186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(Ed.) (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Pienemann, Manfred, Frank Lanze, Howard Nicholas & Anke Lenzing
2022. Chapter 3. Stabilization. In Second Language Acquisition Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 14],  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.