Cover not available
Part of
Dynamic Variation in Second Language Acquisition: A language processing perspective
Bronwen Patricia Dyson
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 8] 2021
► pp. 249–256

References

Adamson, H. D
(2009) Interlanguage variation in theoretical and pedagogical perspective. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adli, A., García, M. G., & Kaufmann, G.
(Eds.) (2015) Variation in language: System-and usage-based approaches (Vol. 50). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L
(2014) Towards a theory of diagnosis in second and foreign language assessment: Insights from professional practice across diverse fields. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 236–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anton, M
(2009) Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. J. N
(1973) Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, R., & Preston, D. R.
(Eds.) (1996) Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (Vol. 10). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berdan, R
(1996) Disentangling language acquisition from language variation. In R. Bayley & D. Preston. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 203–244). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B.
(Eds.) (2015) Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (EUROSLA Monographs Series 3). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: European Second Language Association. Retrieved on 3 February 2021 from [URL]Google Scholar
Bickerton, D
(1975) Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J.
(Ed.) (1982) The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., Asudeh, A., Toivonen, I., & Wechsler, S
(2015) Lexical-functional syntax (Vol. 16). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. Retrieved on 3 February 2021 from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M
(2013) Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J
(1978) The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 207–230). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L
(2011) Reassessing the applicability of Processability Theory: The case of nominal plural. Second Language Research, 27(4), 509–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M
(1983) Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P
(1981) Formal simplicity and functional simplification. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), New dimensions in second language acquisition research (pp. 146–152). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Crystal, D
(2011) A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (Vol. 30). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M
(2001) Syntax and semantics: Vol. 34. Lexical functional grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, D
(1973) Implicational scales and sociolinguistic linearity. Linguistics, 73, 30–43.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J. M., Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A
(2008) Effects of trait emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult multilinguals: A review and empirical investigation. Language Learning, 58(4), 911–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S
(2002) Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18, 272–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y
(2015) The development of English as a Second Language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (EUROSLA Monographs Series 3, pp. 85–115). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. European Second Language Association. Retrieved on 3 February from [URL]Google Scholar
Dickerson, L. J
(1975) The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly, 9(4), 401–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z
(2006) Individual differences in second language acquisition. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dörnyei (Eds.), Themes in SLA research. AILA Review, 19(1), 42–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K
(1974) Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, B. P.
(2005) Developmental style in second language processing: A study of inter-learner variation in the acquisition of English as a Second Language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
(2009) Processability Theory and the role of morphology in ESL development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25, 355–376.
(2010) Learner language analytic methods and pedagogical implications. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 30.1–30.21. DOI logo
(2016) Variation, individual differences and second language processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(4), 341–395. DOI logo
(2018) Developmental sequences. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.-in-Chief), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (8 Vols). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logo
(2019) Are speech and writing teachable? Re-examining developmental constraints on pedagogy. In R. Arntzen, G. Håkansson, A. Hjelde, & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Teachability and learnability across languages (pp. 71–93). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Dyson, B. P. & Håkansson, G
(2017) Understanding second language processing: A focus on Processability Theory (Vol. 4). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. G. H
(2011) Deletion of /t, d/ and the acquisition of linguistic variation by second language learners of English. Language Learning, 61(4), 1256–1301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U
(2013) Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning, 63(1), 25–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R
(1985a) A variable competence model of second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23(1-4), 47–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985b) Sources of variability in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 118–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Item versus system learning: Explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics, 20(4), 460–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525–551). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W
(2015) What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 65(1), 33–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedzechkina, M., Newport, E. L., & Jaeger, T. F
(2016) Miniature artificial language learning as a complement to typological data. In L. Ortega, E. Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 211–234). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E
(1978) Patterned phonetic variability in second-language speech: A gradual diffusion model. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 34(3), 335–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L
(2003) A comparison of copula choice: Native Spanish speakers and advanced learners. Language Learning, 53(4), 703–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P
(2006) Second language acquisition of variable structures in Spanish by Portuguese speakers. Language Learning, 56(1), 53–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Long, A. Y
(2014) Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gnevsheva, K
(2017) Within-speaker variation in passing for a native speaker. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(2), 213–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y.
(Eds.) (2016) Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (Vol. 3). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L
(1944) A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9(2), 139–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C
(2010) Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning, 60(3), 628–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R
(2001) Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huebner, T
(1983) A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
(1985) System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35(2), 141–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Ellis, R., & Eskildsen, S. W
(2015) Orders and sequences in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax, 40 years on: An introduction to the special issue. Language Learning, 65(1), 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itani-Adams, Y
(2009) Development of discourse functions in Japanese and English bilingual first language acquisition. In J.-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp. 41–68). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2011) Bilingual first language acquisition. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory (pp. 121–132). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, M
(1985) Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.Google Scholar
Johnston, M.
1994 Second Language Acquisition: A Classroom Perspective. Sydney, NLLIA Language Acquisition Research Centre, University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
Johnston, M
(1997) Development and variation in learner language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(1969) The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, 30-87.Google Scholar
Labov, W
(1970) The study of language in its social context. In Studium Generale, (Vol. 23, pp. 30–87).Google Scholar
(1972a) Sociolinguistic patterns (No. 4). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1972b) The internal evolution of linguistic rules. In R. P. Stockwell & R. K. S. Macaulay (Eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory (pp. 101–171). London, England: Bloomington.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D
(2012) Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching, 45(2), 202–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H
(1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London, England: Longman.Google Scholar
(2015) Exploring regularities and dynamic systems in L2 development. Language Learning, 65(1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M, Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liebner, M., & Pienemann, M
(2011) Explaining learner variation. In M. Pienemann & J-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory: An introductory textbook (pp. 64–67). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M
(2015) Variability and variation in acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning, 65(1), 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(1987) The competition model. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mansouri, F
(2005) Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language: Typological features and their processing implications. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 117–153). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marijuan, S., Lago, S., & Sanz, C
(2016) Can English-Spanish emerging bilinguals use agreement morphology to overcome word order bias? In L. Ortega, E. Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 189–210). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M
(1977) The language of foreign workers in Germany. In C. H. Molony, H. Zobl, & W. Stolting (Eds.), Deutsch im Kontakt mit anderen Sprachen (pp. 184–212). Kronborg, Denmark: Scriptor-Verlag.Google Scholar
(1980) Linguistic simplification: A study of immigrant workers’ speech and foreigner talk. In S. W. Felix (Ed.), Second language development: Trends and issues (pp. 13–40). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
(1983) Strategies of second language acquisition: More than one kind of simplification. In R. W. Anderson (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition (pp. 120–157). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, C. & Håkansson, G.
(2007) The interaction of complexity and PT-level: The case of Swedish as a Foreign Language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 45-68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Understanding second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Tyler, A. E
(2016) The vibrant and expanded study of usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism. In Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., & Uno, M. (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 1–12). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., & Uno, M.
(Eds.) (2016) The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Pallotti, G
(2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A., Blackledge, A., Piller, I., & Teutsch-Dwyer, M.
(Eds.) (2011) Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender (Vol. 6). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R. & Falodun, J
(1993) Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (Vol. 93, pp. 9–34). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M
(1980) The second language acquisition of immigrant children. In S. W. Felix (Ed.), Second language development: Trends and issues (pp. 41–56). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
(1981) Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder [The second language acquisition of the children of foreign workers]. Bonn, Germany: Bouvier.Google Scholar
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Language processing and second language development: processability theory. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(Ed.) (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M
(2011a) Developmental schedules. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory: An introductory textbook (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Learner variation. In M. Pienemann & J-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory: An introductory textbook (pp. 12–24). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) An outline of Processability Theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning, 65(1), 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S
(2005) Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–251). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M
(1987) Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45–141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Research Centre, Adult Migrant Education Program.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G
(1988) Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 217–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Keβler, J.-U.
(Eds.) (2011) Studying Processability Theory: An introductory textbook (Vol. 1). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Mackey, A
(1993) An empirical study of children’s ESL development and rapid profile. In P. McKay (Ed.), ESL development: Language and literacy in schools (Vol. 2, pp. 115–259). Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia and National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U.
(Eds.) (2011) Studying Processability Theory: An introductory textbook (Vol. 1). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R
(1996) Variationist perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. In R. Bayley & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (Vol. 10, pp. 1–46). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Variation linguistics and SLA. Second Language Research, 9(2), 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) A variationist perspective on second language acquisition: Psycholinguistic concerns. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, V
(2013) Variation. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook for second language acquisition (pp. 272–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S
(2008) Variation. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (Vol. 27, pp. 409–435). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sakai, H
(2008) An analysis of Japanese university students’ oral performance in English using Processability Theory. System, 36(4), 534–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spinner, P
(2013) Language production and reception: A Processability Theory study. Language Learning, 63(4), 704–739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M
(2010) Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stauble, A. M
(1984) A comparison of a Spanish-English and a Japanese-English second language continuum: Negation and verb morphology. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 323–353). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Tarone, E.
(1980): "Communication strategies, foreigner talk and repair in interlanguage", Language Learning, 30, 417-31.Google Scholar
Tarone, E
(1983) On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 142–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985) Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning, 35(3), 373–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Variation in interlanguage. London, England: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M
(2006) Variation in SLA. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 387–394). Oxford, England: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M
(1996) Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12(1), 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M. H., & Lowie, W
(2011) Variability and DST. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M
(2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X
(2012) A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C.
(2015) Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories of second language acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 37-56). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2018) Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp.37-57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M
(1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
White, L.
(2003) Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S
(2016) A friendly conspiracy of input, L1, and processing demands: That variation in the language of German and Spanish learners of English. In L. Ortega, A. E., Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 115–134). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Y
(2008) The early syntactic development in child L2 acquisition: What happens after “canonical order”? In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 247–268). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2009) The development of plural marking and plural agreement in child English L2 acquisition. In J.-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp. 9–39). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Young, R
(1993) Functional constraints on variation interlanguage morphology. Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 76–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zafar, S., & Meenakshi, K
(2012) Individual learner differences and second language acquisition: A review. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(4), 639–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y
(2001) Second language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: A Processability Theory perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.Google Scholar
(2005) Processing and formal instruction in the L2 acquisition of five Chinese grammatical morphemes. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–252). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Widyastuti, I
(2010) Acquisition of L2 English morphology: A family case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 29.1–29.17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar