References
Agostini, T., & Best, C.
(2015) Exploring Processability Theory-based hypotheses in the second language acquisition of a child with autism spectrum disorder. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (pp. 275–290). European Second Language Association.Google Scholar
Ahmad Sabri, A. A., Mohammed Salleh, R. T. A., & Di Biase, B.
(2021) Instructing Malaysian Children with HFASD in English as a Second Language. Asiatic, 15(1), 92–114.Google Scholar
Arntzen, R., Håkansson, G., Hjielde, A., & Keßler, J-U.
(Eds.) (2019) Teachability and learnability across languages. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Artoni, D.
(2019) Case within the phrasal procedure stage. Sequences of acquisition in Russian L2. In A. Lenzing, H. Nicholas, & J. Roos (Eds.), Widening contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues (pp. 105–129). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Artoni, D., & Magnani, M.
(2013) LFG contribution in second language acquisition research: The development of case in Russian L2. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), LFG13 Conference (pp. 69–89). CSLI.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & Devescovi, A.
(1989) Crosslinguistic studies of sentence production. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 225–253). Cambridge University Press.
Bayram, F.
(2013) Acquisition of Turkish by heritage speakers: A processability approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Newcastle.
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B.
(2015) Processability Theory: Theoretical bases and universal schedules. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monograph Series 3) (pp.117–147). Eurosla. [URL]Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M.
(1994) Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bonilla, C.
(2015) Instructing stages of Processability Theory in L2 Spanish: Next or Next + 1? In K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman, & M. Van Herreweghe (Eds.), Theoretical and methocological develpments in Processability Theory (pp. 205–237). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, K., Nordlinger, R., & Sadler, L.
(2019) Lexical-functional grammar: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J.
(2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., & Kanerva, J. M.
(1989) Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(1), 1–50. [URL]
Bresnan, J., & Mchombo, S.
(1987) Topic, pronoun and agreement in Chichewa. Language, 63(4), 741–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
(1973) A first language. Penguin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Confucius Institute Headquarters (Hanban)
(2018) Confucius Institute annual development report.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M.
(2001) Syntax and semantics: Lexical functional grammar. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dang, N. T.
(2011) Exploring CALL options for teaching EFL in Vietnam. Retrieved on 1 July 2022 from [URL]
Dardjowidjojo, S.
(2000) English teaching in Indonesia. EA Journal, 18(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
Di Biase, B.
(2002) Focusing strategies in second language development: A classroom-based study of Italian in primary school. In B. Di Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (pp. 95–120). Language Australia.Google Scholar
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y.
(2015) The development of English as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (pp. 85–115). European Second Language Association. [URL]Google Scholar
Di Biase, B.
(2008) Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Kessler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 197–219). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Di Biase, B., & Bettoni, C.
(2015) The development of Italian as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monograph Series 3) (pp.117–147). Eurosla.Google Scholar
Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2002) Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18(3), 274–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donitsa-Schmidt, S., Inbar, O., & Shohamy, E.
(2004) The effects of teaching spoken Arabic on students’ attitudes and motivation in Israel. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 217–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ethnologue
(2020, August 7). Languages of the world. Retrieved on 1 July 2022 from [URL]
Falk, Y. N.
(2001) Lexical-functional grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. CSLI.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S.
(1999) Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 78–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores d’Arcais, G. B.
(1987) Perceptual factors and word order in event descriptions. In G. Kempen (Ed.), Natural language generation (pp. 441–451). Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garðarsdóttir, M., & Þorvaldsdóttir, S.
(2020) A processability approach to the development of case in L2 Icelandic. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 11(1), 68–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, J.
(2016) English language education policies in the People’s Republic of China. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 49–90). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, G. P., & Paller, D. L.
(2016) English language education policy in Japan: At a crossroads. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 153–180). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Gao, X.
(2020) The teaching and learning of Chinese as a second or foreign language: The current situation and future directions. Frontiers of Education in China, 15(1), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G.
(2017) Typological and developmental considerations on specific language impairment in monolingual and bilingual children: A Processability Theory account. Language Acquisition, 24(3), 265–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G., Salameh, E., & Nettelbladt, U.
(2003) Measuring language development in bilingual children: Swedish-Arabic children with and without language impairment. Linguistics 41, 255–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelde, A., Kvifte, B. H., Emilsen, L. E., & Arntze, R.
(2019) Processability Theory as a tool in the study of a heritage speaker of Norwegian. In A. Lenzing, H. Nicholas, & J. Roos (Eds.), Widening contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues (pp. 185–206). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y.
(2007) China’s foreign language policy on primary English education: What’s behind it? Language Policy, 6(3/4), 359–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itani-Adams, Y.
(2011) Bilingual first language acquisition. In M. Pienemann & J. U. Keβler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory (pp. 121–130). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Japan Foundation
(2020, August 15). Survey on Japanese-language education abroad 2018. Retrieved on 1 July 2022 from [URL]
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L.
(1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive psychology, 21(1), 60–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G.
Kaplan, R., & Bresnan, J.
(1982) Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 173–281). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kawaguchi, S.
(2010) Learning Japanese as a second language: A processability perspective. Cambria Press.Google Scholar
(2015) The development of Japanese as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monograph Series 3) (pp. 149–193). Eurosla.Google Scholar
Kawaguchi, S. & Hardini, I.
(2022) Developmentally moderated focus on form instruction and feedback in an Indonesian kindergarten EFL programme: Acquisition of plural marking. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 6.2, 163–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E.
(1987) An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11(2), 201–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keßler, J.-U., Lenzing, A., & Liebner, M.
(Eds.) (2016) Developing, modelling and assessing second languages. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A.
(2007) World Englishes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R., & Bui, T. T. N.
(2016) Introduction: The challenges for English education policies in Asia. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia, (pp. 1–23). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A., Scarino, A., Curnow, T. J., Kohler, M., Scrimgeour, A., & Morgan, A.-M.
(2007) Investigation of the state and nature of languages in Australian schools: RCLCES. University of South Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Lie, A.
(2017) English and identity in multicultural contexts: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. TEFLIN Journal, 28(1), 71–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition, Vol.2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. L. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 179–192). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnani, M.
(2019) Developing morpho-syntax in non-configurational languages: A comparison between Russian L2 and Italian L2. In A. Lenzing, H. Nicholas, & J. Roos (Eds.), Widening contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues, (pp. 132–153). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mansouri, F.
(2005) Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language: Typological features and their processing implications. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp.117–154). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Medojević, L.
(2014) The effect of first year of schooling on bilingual language acquisition: A study of second and third generation Serbian-Australian 5-year-old bilingual children from processability perceptive (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Sydney.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China
(2005) 孔子学院的数目可以达到100 所 [The number of the Confucius Institutes around the world to be one hundred]. Retrieved on 1 July 2022 from [URL]
Mycock, L.
(2007) Constituent question formation and focus: A new typological perspective. Philological Society 105(2), 192–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T.
(2017) Vietnam’s national foreign language 2020 project after 9 years: A difficult stage. The International academic forum. Retrieved on 2 July 2022 from [URL]
Nhan, T.
(2013) Promoting content and language integrated learning in gifted high schools in Vietnam: Challenges and impacts. Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society 38, 146–153.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, R.
(1998) Constructive case: Evidence from Australian Languages. CSLI.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E.
(1980) Lectures on language performance. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 52–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) An introduction to Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 1–60). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2005) Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–252). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pop, A.
(2010) The impact of the new technologies in foreign language instruction: Our experience. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Science, 2, 1185–1189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & VanPatten, B.
(2013) On multiplicity and mutual exclusivity. The case of different SLA theories. In M. Garcia Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 243–256). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. H.
(1991) Warlpiri morpho-syntax. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V.
(1994) Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Türker-van der Heiden, E., & Mercan, G.
(2019) The acquisition of Turkish (genitive)- possessive structures by adult Norwegian learners. In R. Arntzen, Håkansson, G., Hjielde, A., & Kesßler, J-U. (Eds.), Teachability and learnability across languages (pp. 205–234). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
University of the People
(2020, August 10). The 12 most important languages to learn for success in 2020. [URL]
Wakimoto, S.
(2013) Teaching English at public elementary schools and the problems to solve. Kobe Tokiwa University Kiyoo, 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Y., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2022) The acquisition of lexical mapping in English as a second language among Japanese and Chinese speakers: A study using two learner corpora. Second Language, 20, 29–35.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.
(2002) A processability approach to L2 acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes. In B. Di Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish, (pp. 29–44). Language Australia.Google Scholar
Zhou, W. Y.
(2020) Mobile assisted Chinese learning: An overview of publications between 2007 and 2019. Frontiers of Education in China, 15(1), 164–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar