Chapter 11
Testing the validity of Processability Theory through a corpus-based analysis
The acquisition of plural marking in English speaking and writing by Japanese native speakers
This chapter presents part of the results of a learner corpus study to test the validity of Processability Theory (PT; Pienemann, 1998, 2005). It also addresses the issues of whether second language (L2) learners are at the same PT stages for speaking and writing. The results of the analysis of spoken and written narratives by 281 Japanese learners, focusing on the acquisition of the English plural marker ‑s on nouns, have demonstrated support for the hypothesised developmental sequence for English morphology in PT. In addition, a positive relationship has been found between the learners’ spoken and written production, suggesting that PT can legitimately be used to examine L2 writing as well as speaking.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Plural marking in English and Japanese
- 3.Developmental stages: Processability Theory (PT)
- 4.Literature review
- 4.1English plural marking
- 4.2Speaking versus writing
- 4.3Learner corpus research
- 5.The study
- 5.1Research design
- 5.1.1Participants
- 5.1.2Materials
- 5.1.3Data collection procedure
- 5.1.4Learner corpus construction
- 5.1.5Data size
- 5.1.6Data analysis
- 6.Results and discussion
- 6.1Output frequency of the plural -s on nouns
- 6.2Acquisition of plural marking
- 6.3Comparison of PT stages between speaking and writing
- 7.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
References (68)
References
Abrahamsson, N. (2013). Developmental sequences. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 173–177). Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alderson, C. (1996). Do corpora have a role in language assessment? In J. Thomas & M. Short (Eds.), Using corpora for language research (pp. 248–259). Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. D. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24(2), 235–243. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barker, F. (2010). How can corpora be used in language testing? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 633–645). Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B. (2015). Grammatical Development in Second Languages: Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory. European Second Language Association. [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonilla, C. (2015). From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 31(1), 53–74. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Botting, N. (2002). Narrative as a tool for the assessment of linguistic and pragmatic impairments. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 18(1), 1–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boulton, A. (2009). Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21(1), 37–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cazden, C., Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1975). Second language acquisition in children, adolescents and adults. Final Report. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (2009). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. Pearson Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L. (2011). Reassessing the applicability of Processability Theory: The case of nominal plural. Second Language Research, 27(4), 509–533. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 185–198. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbette, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2002). Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18(3), 274–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2015). The development of English as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monograph Series 3) (pp. 85–115). Eurosla.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23(2), 245–258. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dyson, B. (2009). Processability Theory and the role of morphology in English as a second language development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25(3), 355–376. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eguchi, A., & Sugiura, M. (2015). Applicability of Processability Theory to Japanese adolescent EFL learners: A case study of early L2 syntactic and morphological development. System, 52, 115–126. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grabowski, J. (2007). The writing superiority effect in the verbal recall of knowledge: Sources and determinants. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (pp. 163–179). Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granfeldt, J. (2008). Speaking and writing in L2 French: Exploring effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 87–98). KVAB Universa Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granger, S. (Ed.) (1998). Learner English on computer. Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granger, S. (2002). A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 3–33). John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C. (2007). Processability Theory applied to written and oral Swedish. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 81–94). Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hughes, R. (2010). What a corpus tells us about grammar teaching materials. In A. O’Keefe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 401–412). Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johns, T. (1991). “Should you be persuaded”: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. In T. Johns, & P. King (Eds.), Classroom concordancing (ELR Journal, 4) (pp. 1–10). University of Birmingham.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keßler, J.-U. (Ed.) (2008). Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning. Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kawaguchi, S., & Di Biase, B. (2012). Acquiring procedural skills in L2: Processability theory and skill acquisition. Studies in Language Sciences, 11, 70–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, R. (2021). Introducing morphology. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luk, Z. P. S., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural ‑s, articles, and possessive ’s. Language Learning, 59(4), 721–754. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Makino, S., & Tsutsui, M. (1986). A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar. The Japan Times.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New American Library.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maynard, S. K. (1990). An introduction to Japanese grammar and communication strategies. The Japan Times.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrby, C., & Håkansson, G. (2007). The interaction of complexity and grammatical processability: The case of Swedish as a foreign language. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(1), 45–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 109–148. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strömqvist, S., Nordqvist, Å., & Wengelin, Å. (2004). Writing the frog-story: Developmental and cross-modal perspectives. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 359–394). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2015). An investigation of Chinese students’ acquisition of oral and written English through the measurement of Processability Theory. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(2), 207–212. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Usami, H. (2015). The application of corpus linguistics to language testing – improving multiple choice questions. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamaguchi, Y. (2009). The development of plural marking and plural agreement in child English L2 acquisition. In J.-U. Keßler, & D. Keatinge (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp. 9–39). Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamaguchi, Y. (2013). Child second language learning: A study of English as a second language acquisition. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamaguchi, Y. & Kawaguchi, S. (2014). Acquisition of English morphology by a Japanese school-aged child: A longitudinal study. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 16(1), 89–119.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamaguchi, Y., & Usami, H. (2017a). Japanese learners’ use of English grammar in speaking and writing: A processability approach. In Proceedings of Pacific Second Language Research Forum 2016 (pp. 237–242).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamaguchi, Y., & Usami, H. (2017b). Plural marking in spoken and written narratives: A corpus-based study of Japanese learners of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(5), 224–231. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Y., & Widyastuti, I. (2010). Acquisition of L2 English morphology: A family case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 29.1–29.17. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Sakoda, Kumiko & Satomi Kawaguchi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.