Topical Relevance in Argumentation

PaperbackAvailable
ISBN 9789027225245 | EUR 65.00 | USD 98.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027280572 | EUR 65.00 | USD 98.00
 
Google Play logo
It is a longstanding if not altogether coherent tradition of logic and rhetorical studies that an argument can be incorrect or fallacious in virtue of some proposition in it being “irrelevant”. This monograph clarifies that tradition. Non-classical propositional calculi, including relevance logics and relatedness logics, are juxtaposed against conversational criticisms of irrelevance in natural argumentation, e.g. in parliamentary debates. The object is to see if there is a reasonable way of evaluating criticisms like “That’s beside the point!” or “That’s irrelevant!”.
[Pragmatics & Beyond, III:8] 1982.  viii, 81 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Blair, J. Anthony
1992. Premissary relevance. Argumentation 6:2  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Blair, J. Anthony
2012. Premissary Relevance. In Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 21],  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Boger, George
2005. Subordinating Truth – Is Acceptability Acceptable?. Argumentation 19:2  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Campillo, Rosa María López & José Luis Gómez Ramos
2022. Argumentation Skills for the Design of Formative Assessment Queries. In Design and Measurement Strategies for Meaningful Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gabbay, Dov M. & John Woods
2010. Relevance in the Law. In Approaches to Legal Rationality,  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Hitchcock, David
1992. Relevance. Argumentation 6:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Hitchcock, David
2017. Relevance. In On Reasoning and Argument [Argumentation Library, 30],  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Scott & Sally Jackson
1992. Relevance and digressions in argumentative discussion: A pragmatic approach. Argumentation 6:2  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Ralph H. & Marcin Koszowy
2018. Logical Culture as a Common Ground for the Lvov-Warsaw School and the Informal Logic Initiative. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55:1  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
1993. The empirical relevance of Perelman's New Rhetoric. Argumentation 7:4  pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
2021. Review of van Eemeren (2018): Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2  pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton
2017. Evaluating Relevance and Commitments in Rhetorical Straw Man. In Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14],  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Malinowski, Jacek & Rafał Palczewski
2021. Relating Semantics for Connexive Logic. In Logic in High Definition [Trends in Logic, 56],  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Müller-Feldmeth, Daniel, Tamara Koch, Chantal Wanderon & Martin Luginbühl
2023. ‘Yes, we’re done’ – ‘except Ricardo’. Research on Children and Social Interaction 6:2 DOI logo
Van Eemeren, Frans H. & Rob Grootendorst
1992. Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem. Argumentation 6:2  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Rob Grootendorst
1995. Argumentation theory. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Rob Grootendorst
2022. Argumentation theory. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Walton, Douglas
2001. Informal Logic, DOI logo
Walton, Douglas N.
1989. Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation 3:2  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Walton, Douglas N.
1992. Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance?. Argumentation 6:2  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Woods, John
2007. Agendas, Relevance and Dialogic Ascent. Argumentation 21:3  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
رمضان تركي جواد
2023. دراسة تداولية للجدل في رواية تشارلز ديكنز "اوليفر تويست". مجلة آداب الفراهيدي 15:53  pp. 603 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CF: Linguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2003541667 | Marc record