Part of
Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 120
Cited by (26)

Cited by 26 other publications

Barcelona, Antonio
2024. Trends in cognitive-linguistic research on metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Littlemore, Jeannette
2023. ‘You’ll find Jane Austen in the basement’ … or Will You? Metonymy and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching,  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2022. Targetting metonymic targets. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16],  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Vilar Lluch, Sara
2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language 29:2  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Chang, Miao-Hsia & Ún-giân Iûnn
2021. A corpus-based study of directives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 47:2  pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław
2020. Figures of speech revisited. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Matusz, Łukasz
2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4)  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Sólyom, Réka
2020. Neologisms in Hungarian terms of quality assurance. Taikomoji kalbotyra :14  pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Zibin, Aseel, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Elham T. Hussein
2020. On the comprehension of metonymical expressions by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 21:1  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Denroche, Charles
Ioannou, Georgios
2019. Metonymy and frame integration: Interfacing between concepts and discourse. Topics in Linguistics 20:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Komatsubara, Tetsuta
2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos
2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. Social Semiotics 27:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Catalano, Theresa, Jill Fox & Saloshna Vandeyar
2016. Being “in a Limbo”: Perceptions of Immigration, Identity and Adaptation of Immigrant Students in South Africa and the United States. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 15:3  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2016. ‘Quo Vadimus?’ from a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12:1  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther
2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1  pp. 168 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2018. Chapter 5. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Catalano, Theresa & John W. Creswell
2013. Understanding the Language of the Occupy Movement. Qualitative Inquiry 19:9  pp. 664 ff. DOI logo
Haferland, Harald & Armin Schulz
2010. Metonymisches Erzählen. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 84:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol
2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1  pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog
2009. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, DOI logo
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
2005. Metonymy. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.