Japanese Discourse Markers
Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis
This book is one of the pioneering historical pragmatic studies of Japanese. It closely illustrates the usage and contributions of some Japanese discourse markers, and reveals their developmental history. The section on Synchronic Analysis explores the previously uninvestigated functions of some discourse markers used in Present Day Japanese. Moment by moment in on-going conversations, where culturally rigidly-defined interactional norms are highly valued, a specific marker is chosen and used by the speakers as their strategy, based on their quite subjective judgment. The section on Diachronic Analysis then demonstrates chronologically how the meanings and forms of the same markers have come into being. Results include some noticeable changes related to the strengthened intersubjectivity. This multi-dimensional study also discusses the relevance of findings to typological characteristics and productivity. Consideration is further given to why certain expressions (rather than others) become discourse markers and independent forms in Japanese.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 132] 2004. xiv, 253 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgments
-
Transcription conventions
-
1. Introduction | pp. 1–29
-
2. Perspectives on Pragmatics of Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis | pp. 31–56
-
3. Functions of the Conjunctions d emo and dakedo in Present Day Japanese (synchronic analysis) | pp. 57–84
-
4. Pragmaticalization of demo and dakedo (diachronic analysis) | pp. 85–121
-
5. Functions of Interjections ne and na in Present Day Japanese (synchronic analysis) | pp. 123–155
-
6. Pragmaticalization of ne and na (diachronic analysis) | pp. 157–195
-
7. Conclusion | pp. 197–218
-
Notes | pp. 219–226
-
-
Name Index | pp. 241–243
-
Subject Index | pp. 245–251
“Onodera’s study opens up the new field of historical pragmatics, superbly combining the methodology of recently developed discourse analysis and the fruitage of the traditional historical study of Japanese. The method and results shown in this book set up important guidelines for future studies in theoretical linguistics and traditional historical linguistics, because this book demonstrates to the former which historical data should be examined in what way, and it also informs the latter that conjunctions and interjections are not marginal, but instead constitute a fertile area of study.
”
”
Satoshi Kinsui, Osaka University
“Building on Schiffrin's groundbreaking study of discourse markers, Onodera significantly advances our cross-linguistic understanding of adversative connectives and interjections. Her synchronic and diachronic analyses of four Japanese discourse markers confirm the broad-scale validity of earlier claims concerning differences between conjunctions and discourse markers on the one hand, and the emergence over time of discourse-based, subjective meanings on the other. The theoretical refinements she proposes, based on typological and speech-style differences between English and Japanese, enhance the field of historical pragmatics in important ways.”
Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Stanford University
“Onodera's study of the development of Japanese discourse markers breaks new ground in the study of discourse and pragmatic markers. By combining different perspectives and methodologies to chart changes in a variety of forms, she provides a clear model that should be emulated by others interested in grammar and discourse not only from a diachronic perspective, but also from a synchronic perspective.”
Deborah Schiffrin, Georgetown University
“[...] this volume makes an important contribution to not only advancing our understanding of such common expressions as 'demo' and 'ne' used in daily conversations but also shedding new light on the general process of pragmaticalization by bringing in Japanese data.”
Sufumi So, George Mason University, on Linguist List, Vol. 16.2263 (2005)
Cited by (38)
Cited by 38 other publications
Chen, Huiling & Jianying Du
2022. The combinative use of “imperative + final particle” in Tokyo language in the Meiji period. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:1 ► pp. 146 ff. 
Tamaji, Mizuho
Tanaka, Lidia
2022. Is formality relevant? Japanese tokenshai,eeandun. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 191 ff.
Tanno, Koji
2022. The role of discourse strategies in the grammaticalization of the Japanese discourse markerdakara. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 592 ff.
Kavanagh, Barry
2021. Chapter 10. A study on how cultural and gender parameters affect emoticon distribution, usage and frequency in American and Japanese online discourse. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 287 ff.
Tanaka, Lidia, Kaori Okano, Ikuko Nakane, Claire Maree, Shimako Iwasaki & Chie Takagi
2021. Japanese Women’s Speech through Life‐Transitions (1989‐2000): An Analysis of Youth Language Features. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021. Language and Social Minds,
Modicom, Pierre-Yves & Olivier Duplâtre
2020. Introduction. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 2 ff.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2020. Chapter 5. Final or medial. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 136 ff.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2021. On and off the common ground: Japanese final particles as (un)grounding devices. Lingua Posnaniensis 63:2 ► pp. 7 ff.
Shimada, Yutaka, Mayumi Tatara, Kantaro Fujiwara & Tohru Ikeguchi
2019. Formation mechanisms of local structures in language networks. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 127:5 ► pp. 56003 ff.
Wong, Angelia & Ruanni Tupas
2019. Durable and changing views of English: a diachronic thematic analysis of National Day Rally speeches in Singapore. Asian Englishes 21:3 ► pp. 224 ff.
Meng, Hai-Rong & Takeshi Nakamoto
2018. Discourse particles in Chinese–Japanese code switching: Constrained by the Matrix Language Frame?. International Journal of Bilingualism 22:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2018. From the inside to the outside of the sentence. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 333 ff.
Yasunari, Asuka
2018. The Role of Questions in Managing Affect and Emotional Involvement in Japanese Conversations. Journal of Universal Language 19:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zawiszová, Halina
2018. On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people,
Hofmockel, Carolin
Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
Nishizaka, Aug
2016. The use of demo-prefaced response displacement for being a listener to distressful experiences in Japanese interaction
. Text & Talk 36:6 ► pp. 757 ff.
Onodera, Noriko O. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Sohn, Sung-Ock S.
2016. Development of the discourse marker kulentey (‘but, by the way’) in Korean. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2015. Historical Discourse Analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 222 ff.
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2015. Periphery of utterances and (inter)subjectification in Modern Japanese. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 135 ff.
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2016. The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 282 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
2015. Discourse MarkersLanguage, Meaning, and Context. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 189 ff.
D'Hondt, Ulrique
2014. Au fait,de faiteten fait. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 49:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
House, Juliane
2014. Managing academic institutional discourse in English as a lingua franca. Functions of Language 21:1 ► pp. 50 ff.
Nejadansari, Dariush & Ali Mohamad Mohammadi
2014. The frequencies and functions of discourse markers in the Iranian university EFL classroom discourse. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 4:2
Shinzato, Rumiko
2014. From degree/manner adverbs to pragmatic particles in Japanese: A corpus-based approach to the parallel diachronic development ofamari,bakari, andyahari. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 77 ff.
Shinzato, Rumiko
2014. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and Japanese grammar: A functional approach. In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156], ► pp. 85 ff.
Shinzato, Rumiko
2017. Chapter 11. Grammaticalization of PMs/DMs/MMs in Japanese. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186], ► pp. 305 ff.
Moriya, Tetsuharu & Kaoru Horie
2009. What Is and Is not Language-Specific about the Japanese Modal System? A Comparative and Historical Perspective. In Japanese Modality, ► pp. 87 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
Jucker, Andreas H.
NARROG, HEIKO
2006. A Renaissance for Historical Semantics (E. C. Traugott and R. B. Dasher, Regularity in Semantic Change). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:2 ► pp. 554 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General