Part of
Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction
Edited by Todd Oakley and Anders Hougaard
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 170] 2008
► pp. 2750
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Andersson, Daniel
2013. Understanding Figurative Proverbs: A Model Based on Conceptual Blending. Folklore 124:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Bajerowska, Anna
2021. Modelowanie multidyscyplinarne problemów lingwistycznych – zarys koncepcji. In Lingwistyka à la inter. Status i perspektywy badań interdyscyplinarnych, DOI logo
Berberović, Sanja & Nihada Delibegović Džanić
2022. Draining the swamp. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16],  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Elliot, Esi A., Carmina Cavazos & Ai Ming Chow
2024. From racialized brands to authentic brands: Dynamic conceptual blending. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 34:1  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Hougaard, Anders, Todd Oakley & Seana Coulson
2022. Who’s talking? Cognitive semiotics in the (new media) wild. Cognitive Semiotics 15:1  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Kaal, Bertie
2015. HOW ‘REAL’ ARE TIME AND SPACE IN POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WORLDVIEWS?. Critical Discourse Studies 12:3  pp. 330 ff. DOI logo
Knapton, Olivia, Alice Power & Gabriella Rundblad
2021. Cognitive Approaches to Discourse Analysis: Applying Conceptual Blending Theory to Understandings of Disease Transmission. In Analysing Health Communication,  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Lewis, Myles
2014. 'You're Not Like Other' Hate Speech. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
2014. Strike, accident, risk, and counter-factuality: hidden meanings of the post-Soviet Russian news discourse of the 1990s via conceptual blending. Language and Cognition 6:3  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Porto, M. Dolores & Manuela Romano
2013. Newspaper Metaphors: Reusing Metaphors Across Media Genres. Metaphor and Symbol 28:1  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Rafoss, Tore Witsø
2019. Enemies of freedom and defenders of democracy: The metaphorical response to terrorism. Acta Sociologica 62:3  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Sandler, Sergeiy
2016. Fictive interaction and the nature of linguistic meaning. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian, Esther Pascual & Bosen Ma
2022. Who’s speaking for whom?. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.