Part of
Language and Food: Verbal and nonverbal experiences
Edited by Polly E. Szatrowski
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 238] 2014
► pp. 131156
References
Aikhenvald, A.Y.
(2004). Evidentiality . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. InW. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 261–272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R.
(1990). Quotation as demonstrations. Language , 66, 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DuBois, J.
(2007). The stance triangle. InR. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1981). Forms of talk . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M. H.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H.
(1992). Assessments and the construction of context. InA. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 147–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C.
(2000). Emotion within situated activity. InN. Budwig, I. C. Uzgris, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 33–54). Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(2011). Contextures of action. InJ. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 182–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M.
(2003). Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation . Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, K.
(1990). Conflict in Japanese conversation . (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
(2004). Managing topics in conversation in Japanese. InP. Szatrowski (Ed.), Hidden and open conflict in Japanese conversational interaction (pp. 29–64). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Kamio, A.
(1994). The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics , 21(1), 67–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G.
(1992). Assisted story telling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology , 15(3), 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masuoka, T.
(1991). Modariti no bunpoo [A grammar of modality]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
(2007). Nihongo no modarit(e)i tankyuu [Investigations of Japanese modality]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Masuoka, T., & Takubo, Y.
(1992). Kiso nihongo bunpoo- Kaiteeban [Basic Japanese grammar- Revised edition]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Minami, F.
(1974). Gendai nihongo no koozoo [Structure of modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
(1993). Gendai nihongo bunpoo no rinkaku [Outline of modern Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, B.
(2009). The interactive consequences of epistemic indexicality- Some thoughts on the epistemic marker -kamosirenai . InB. Pizziconi & M. Kizu (Eds.), Japanese modality (pp. 259–286). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szatrowski, P.
(1993). Nihongo no danwa no koozoo bunseki- Kanyuu no danwa no sutoratezii no koosatu [Structure of Japanese conversation-Invitation strategies]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
(2000). Kyoodoo hatuwa ni okeru sankasya no tatiba to gengo/ higengo koodoo no kanren ni tuite [Relation between participant status and verbal/ nonverbal behavior in co-construction]. Nihongo Kagaku [Japanese Linguistics], 7, 44–69.Google Scholar
(2002). Syntactic projectability and co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Berkeley Linguistics Society , 28, 315–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Subjectivity, perspective and footing in Japanese co-construction. InR. Zacharski & N. Hedberg (Eds.), Topics on the grammar-pragmatics interface: Essays in honor of Dr. Jeanette K. Gundel (pp. 313–339). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.). (2010). Storytelling across Japanese conversational genre . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Sisyokukai no gengo/ higengo koodoo ni tuite- 30-sai miman no zyosee guruupu o tyuusin ni [Verbal and nonverbal behavior in a taster lunch- Focusing on a group of women under 30]. Hikaku Nihongaku Kyooiku Kenkyuu Sentaa Kenkyuu Nenpoo [Center for Comparative Japanese Studies Annual Bulletin], 7, 281–292. (Ochanomizu University)Google Scholar
(2013). Tabemono o hyooka-suru sai ni motiirareru “kyakukanteki hyoogen” to “syukanteki hyoogen” ni tuite [On the use of “subjective” and “objective” expressions for food assessment in Japanese]. Kokuritu Kokugo Kenkyuuzyo Ronbunsyuu [NINJAL Research Papers], 5, 95–120.Google Scholar
Wiggins, S., & Potter, J.
(2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology 42 , 513–531. DOI logo
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Szatrowski, Polly
2022. How is laughter used to create and reinforce food attitudes in Japanese Dairy Taster Brunch conversations. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 38:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.