Cover not available
Part of
Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context
Edited by Fabienne H. Baider and Georgeta Cislaru
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 241] 2014
► pp. 189–212

Bad feelings in context

ORCID logo | University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
This article reevaluates Wierzbicka’ s definition (1998) for anger, and includes a proposal regarding cross-cultural data collection in the framework of the Natural Semantic Metalanguage model (see Wierzbicka 1991 and 1999). Since in order to write a NSM definition, it is imperative to identify the most pertinent semantic associations of a concept, we suggest using the socio-cognitive approach (SCA), based on Giora’ s concept of saliency (2003). As a case in point, we study the two concepts hatred and anger as socio-culturally and linguistically defined in two different linguistic and cultural communities (in Franco-French and Cypriot Greek communities). We collected both oral and written data in order to define the salient features of both concepts. When the two corpora are contrasted, some differences regarding the referential dimension have been noted. However semantically a similar categorization for anger and hatred can be drawn from the data in both communities. This study hightlights the fact that revenge occurs by default with hatred, but not with anger as previously suggested.1
Published online: 13 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.241.11bai
References (62)
Bibliography
Akhtar, Salman, Selma Kramer, and Parens Henri. 1995. The Birth of Hatred. Northvale: NJ.Google Scholar
Andrews, Edna, and Tina Krennmayr. 2007. “Cross-cultural linguistic realizations of conceptualizations of anger: Revisiting cognitive and pragmatic paradigms.” In Contemporary Issues in Slavic and Eastern European Studies, Glossos 9.Google Scholar
Averill, James R. 1983. “Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion.” American Psychologist 38: 1145–1160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Averill, James R., George Catlin, and Kyum K. Chon. 1991. Rules of Hope. New – York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Averill, James R. 1996. “Intellectual emotions.” In The Emotions. Social, Cultural and Biological Dimensions, ed. by Rom Harré, and W. Gerrod Parrott, 24–39. London: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baider, Fabienne. 2012a. “Haine et colère: approche socio-cognitive et explicitation en métalangue sémantique naturelle”. CMLF 2012, 1701–1717. Paris: Institut de linguistique française.Google Scholar
. 2012b. “Le sentiment ‘haine’ en contexte linguistique et cognitif.” Études Romanes de Brno 33(2): 171–192.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Saliency Features in Cross-cultural Semantics.” In Linguistic Aspects of Intercultural Pragmatics ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Tromero, 7–27. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besnier, Niko. 1993. “Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae Atoll.” In Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, ed. by Jane H. Hill and Judith T. Irvine, 161–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Peter. 2002. “Le centrage du verbe transitif.” Syntaxe et sémantique 4: 15–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Profil combinatoire des mots: analyse contrastive.” In La phraséologie dans tous ses états, ed. by Catherine Bolly, Jean-René Klein, and Béatrice Lamiroy. Cahiers de l’Institut Linguistique de Louvain 31 (2): 131–148.Google Scholar
Coben, Harlan. 2011. Caught. England: Pinguin Books.Google Scholar
Constantinou, Maria. This volume. “Conceptual metaphors of Anger in popularized scientific texts: a contrastive (English/Greek/French) cognitive-discursive approach.”
Cruse, Alan. 2000. Meaning in Language. Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Debrenne, Michèle, Claude Frey, and Mary-Annick Morel. 2008. “L’étude des champs associatifs du français: création d’un dictionnaire des normes associatives.” Lexique, CMLF08. Paris: Institut linguistique de Paris.Google Scholar
Fonagy, Ivan. 1991 [1983]. La vive voix. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Galatanu, Olga. 2004. “La sémantique des possibles argumentatifs et ses enjeux pour l’analyse de discours.” In Actes du Congrès International d’Etudes Françaises, La Rioja, Croisée des Chemins, ed. by Maria Jesus Salinero Cascante, and I. Inarrea Las Veras, 213–225. Spain: Lagrano.Google Scholar
Gambier, Yves. 1988. “Interaction verbales et production de sens.” Cahiers de linguistique sociale 13: 11–103.Google Scholar
Gaudin, François. 1993. “Socioterminologie. Du signe au sens, construction d’un champ.” Meta : journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators' Journal 38 (2): 293–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaylin, Willard. 2003. Hatred. The Psychological Descent into Violence. New-York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W.. 1983. “Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 9: 524–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, and Ofer Fein. 1999. “On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2002. “Explicating emotions across languages and cultures: A semantic approach.” In The Verbal Communication of Emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives, by Susan R. Fussell. 19–53. Mhawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, and Bert Peeters. 2006. “The Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach: An overview with reference to the most important Romance languages.” In Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Evidence from the Romance languages ed. by Bert Peeters. 17–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2008. Cross Linguistics Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. ‘The Natural Semantic Metalanguage approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Bert Heine and Harold Narrog. 459–484. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and W. Gerrod Parrott. (ed.). 1996. The Emotions: Social, Cultural and Biological Dimensions. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Humbley, John. 1989. “Terminologie et conscience linguistique.” La banque des mots, 97–104. Paris: CILF.Google Scholar
Kassinove, Howard, and Raymond Chip Tafrate. 2006. “Anger related disorders: Basic issues, models, and diagnostic considerations.” In Comparative Treatments of Anger Disorders, ed. by Eva Feindler, 115–137. NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2001. “The graded salience hypothesis in second language acquisition.” In Applied Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Martin Putz, Susanne Niemeier, and Rene Dirven, 249–271. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Dueling context: A dynamic model of meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (3): 385–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koselak, Arkadiusz. 2005. “Mépris / dédain, deux mots pour un même sentiment?” Lidil 32. <[URL]>. (November 2011).Google Scholar
. 2007. Sémantique des sentiments, « quand je pense à toi je ressens quelque chose de mauvais » en français et en polonais. Ph. D. thesis (dir. C. Masseron and A. Petitjean), University Paul Verlaine, Metz, France.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan. 1995. “Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence.” In Language and the cognitive construal of the world, ed. by John R. Taylor, and Robert E. Maclaury, 181–196. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. “The concept of anger: Universal or cultural specific?” Psychopathology 33: 159–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S. 1984. “On the primacy of cognition.” American Psychologist 39 (2): 124–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Léon, Monique, and Pierre Léon. 2004 [1993]. La prononciation du français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Lidil 32, 2005, at [URL]
Lochman, John. E., Tammy D. Barry, Nicole Powell, and Laura Young. 2010. “Anger and aggression.” In Practitioner’s Guide to Empirically Based Measures of Social Skills, ed. by Douglas W. Nangle, David J. Hansen, Cynthia A. Erdley, and Peter J. Norton, 155–166. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, William. 1980. Emotion. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Philippe. 2009. Intonation du français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Metzeltin, Michael, and Sonja Kral. 2007. “Der Sicherheitsbegriff. Ein kognitives Faktorenmodell.” In Sexaginta. Festschrift für Johannes Kramer, ed. by Wolfang Dahmen, and Rainer Schlösser, 221–237. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Neill, Trammel Wilfred., D.V. Hilliard and E. Cooper. 1988. “The detection of lexical ambiguity: Evidence for context sensitive parallel access.” Journal of Memory and Language 27: 279–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan A. Sag, and Thomas Wasow. 1994. “Idioms.” Language 70 (3): 491–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panskepp, Jaak. 1982. “Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotion.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5: 407–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peeters, Bert. (ed.) 2006. Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical Findings from the Romance Languages. (Studies in Language companion series). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plutchik, Robert. 1962. The Emotions: Facts, Theories, and a New Model. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Potegal, Michael and Raymond, W. Novaco. 2010. “A brief history of anger.” In Handbook of Anger: Constituent and Concomitant Biological, Psychological, and Social Processes, ed. by Michael Potegal, Gerhard Stemmler, Charles Spielberger. 9–24. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, and Carolyn B. Mervis. 1975. “Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories.” Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Micaela. 2010. “Des mots pour dire le monde. La culture enfantine dans les définitions d’enfants”. Cultures enfantines : universalité et diversité, 279–292. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tutin, Agnès, Iva Novakova, Francis Grossman, and Cristelle Cavalla. 2006. “Esquisse de typologie des noms d’affect à partir de leurs propriétés combinatoires.” Langue française 150: 32–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, John. B. 1919. Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviorist. London: Lippincott. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna, and Elzbieta Jamrozik. 1988. “L’amour, la colère, la joie, l’ennui. La sémantique des émotions dans une perspective transculturelle.” Langages 89: 97–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Cross-cultural Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Defining emotion concepts”. Cognitive Science 16 (4): 539–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “Sadness and anger in Russian: The non-universality of the so-called "basic human emotions".” In Speaking of Emotions: Conceptualisation and Expression, ed. by Angeliki Athanasiadou, and Elzbieta Tabakowska, 3–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999a. “Emotional universals”. Language Design 2: 23–69.Google Scholar
. 1999b. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiley, Jennifer, and Rayner Keith. 2000. “Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements.” Memory & Cognition 28: 1011–1021. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Constantinou, Maria
2014. Conceptual metaphors of anger in popularized scientific texts: A contrastive (English/Greek/French) cognitive-discursive approach. In Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 241], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.