Part of
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 324
References (60)
References
Aarts, Jan. M.G. and Calbert, Joseph P. 1979. Metaphor and Non-Metaphor. The Semantics of Adjective Noun Combinations. Max Niemeyer Verlag: Tübingen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura and Alba-Juez, Félix 2013. “Identity, Evaluation, and Differential Equations”. Pragmatics and Cognition, 20:3 (2012), 570–592. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan (ed). 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. “Evaluation and cognition: Inscribing, evoking and provoking opinion”. In Language and Memory. Aspects of Knowledge Representation. Hanna Pishwa (ed), 187–221. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika (ed). 2008a. Evaluation in Text Types. Special Issue of Functions of Language 15.1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2008b. Emotion Talk across Corpora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009a. “Dimensions of evaluation. Cognitive and linguistic perspectives.Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (1): 146–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b. “Emotion talk and emotional talk: Cognitive and discursive perspectives”. In Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind, Hanna Pishwa (ed), 395–431. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward. 1989. “Styles of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect.Text 9: 93–93.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen [1978] 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Fleischman, Suzanne. 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 2000. “Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 39–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber. 2000. “Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 57–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1981. The Later Works, 1925–1953, J.A. Boydston (ed), Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne and Slade, Diana. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felices-Lago, Ángel. 1997. “La compilación de un diccionario de términos valorativos desde la perspectiva lexemático-funcional.” In Toward a Functional Lexicology/ Hacia una lexicología funcional, Gerd Wotjak (ed), 159–184. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2003. “Reformulation of the domain-level semantic pattern of axiological evaluation in the lexicon of English verbs.Hermes 30: 179–179.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2004. Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gerard 1997. Paratexts. Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 2010. “Can there be a pragmatic theory for the entire world?” Plenary talk given at the 4th International Conference on Intercultural Pragmatics and Communication. Madrid, 15–17 November 2010.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Discourse Ethics: Notes on Philosophical Justification. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1976. System and Function in Language. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London ; Baltimore: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2 nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday M.A.K. and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3 rd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2008. “The evaluation of status in multi-modal texts.Functions of Language 15 (1): 64–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff (eds). 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Sinclair, John. 2000. “A local grammar of evaluation”. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Linguistics and poetics.” In Style in Language, Thomas Sebeok (ed), 350–377. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2002. Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1785] 1993. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (3rd ed.) Translated by James W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1990. “The axiological aspect of idealized cognitive models.” In Meaning and Lexicography, Jerzy Tomaszczyk and Barbara Lewandowska (eds), 135–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. “The transformation of experience in narrative syntax.” In Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 354–405.Google Scholar
1982. “Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Deborah Tannen (ed), 219–247. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1997a. “Some further steps in narrative analysis.Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997b. “Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience”. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 3–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. “Narrative pre-construction.” In Narrative: State of the Art, Michael Bamberg (ed), 47–56. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William and Waletzky, Joshua. 1967. “Narrative analysis.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, June Helm (ed), 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. 1765. New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary and Martin, J.R. (eds). 2003. Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation. Special Issue, Text 23.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. 1999. “Beyond exchange : appraisal systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 1993 [2008]. Pragmatics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neil R. 1993. Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, Charles E. 1980. Lectures on Language Performance. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osgood, Charles E., Suci, George, and Tannenbaum, Percy 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: UND.Google Scholar
Plato 380 B.C. Euthyphro. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Webpage consulted on August 16, 2012: [URL]
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela. 2006. “Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed), 339–358. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 2007. Context in dynamic interpretation. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Lawrence R.Horn and Gregory Ward (eds), 197–220. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation: an introduction”. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Gelder, Tim. 1998. “The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 615–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1921. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Alianza Editorial, Madrid 2009.Google Scholar
Cited by (42)

Cited by 42 other publications

Gozdz-Roszkowski, Stanislaw
2024. Hostility to Religion or Protection Against Discrimination? Evaluation and Argument in a Case of Conflicting Principles. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura, Paula Pérez-Sobrino, Laura Filardo-Llamas, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo, Begoña Núñez-Perucha, Alfonso Sánchez-Moya & Julia T. Williams Camus
2024. A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:2  pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Krasselt, Julia & Philipp Dreesen
2024. Topic models indicate textual aboutness and pragmatics: Valuation practices in Islamophobic discourse. Journal of Cultural Analytics 7:2 DOI logo
Tarasova, Elizaveta & José A. Sánchez Fajardo
Fajardo, José Antonio Sánchez
2023. A morphopragmatic study of [X-word] constructions through their morphological replicability and pragmatic functions. Lexis :21 DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2023. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Overbeck, Maximilian, Christian Baden, Tali Aharoni, Eedan Amit-Danhi & Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt
2023. Beyond sentiment: an algorithmic strategy for identifying evaluations within large text corpora. Communication Methods and Measures  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2022. “I Am Proud to Be a Traitor”. Pragmatics and Society 13:3  pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Hidalgo-Tenorio, Encarnación & Miguel-Ángel Benítez-Castro
2022. Trump’s populist discourse and affective politics, or on how to move ‘the People’ through emotion. Globalisation, Societies and Education 20:2  pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Jun
2022. Evaluative language and gender stereotyping: a case study of the perpetuation of sexism in literary translation. Perspectives 30:6  pp. 1027 ff. DOI logo
Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada
2021. The interplay of complexity and subjectivity in opinionated discourse. Discourse Studies 23:2  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Siromaa, Maarit & Mirka Rauniomaa
2021. Stance and Evaluation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Song, Jiannan
2021. Appraising with Metaphors: A Case Study of the Strategic Ritual for Invoking Journalistic Emotions in News Reporting of the China–US Trade Disputes. Critical Arts 35:5-6  pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Lihua, Chaoqun Xie & Jun Lei
2021. Discursive Marketisation Through Positive Evaluation: A Diachronic Analysis of About Us Texts of Top-Tier Chinese Universities Over the Past Two Decades. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2  pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Bolívar, Adriana
2020. Las nociones de <i>texto</i> y <i>contexto</i> en la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional (LSF): aplicaciones, críticas y desarrollos en América Latina. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada :70  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Cruz, Javier & Antonio Moreno-Ortiz
2020. Building the Great Recession News Corpus (GRNC): A contemporary diachronic corpus of economy news in English. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8:2  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Haddad, Youssef A.
2020. Optional you and the invocation of shared identity in Levantine Arabic. In The Routledge Handbook of Arabic and Identity,  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Kolhatkar, Varada, Hanhan Wu, Luca Cavasso, Emilie Francis, Kavan Shukla & Maite Taboada
2020. The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments. Corpus Pragmatics 4:2  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Kotzur, Gerrit
2020. Chapter 6. Metaphors for protest. In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87],  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Larina, Tatiana & Douglas Mark Ponton
2020. Tact or frankness in English and Russian blind peer reviews. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:4  pp. 471 ff. DOI logo
Larina, Tatiana & Douglas Mark Ponton
2022. I wanted to honour your journal, and you spat in my face: emotive (im)politeness and face in the English and Russian blind peer review. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Lopes, Rodrigo Esteves de Lima
2020. Reactions to Social Quotas: a study of Facebook comments in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista da ABRALIN  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun & Peter Teo
2020. Institutional self-promotion: a comparative study of appraisal resources used by top- and second-tier universities in China and America. Higher Education 80:2  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Alba-Juez, Laura & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2019. Chapter 1. Emotion processes in discourse. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2019. Marriage, Liberty and Constitution: a Corpusassisted Study of Value-Laden Words in Legal Argumentation. Research in Language 17:1  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2019. Chapter 6. “It is not just a fact that the law requires this, but it is a reasonable fact”. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Nevala, Minna
2019. Two miserable creatures or those atrocious criminals?. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306],  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Su, Hang & Susan Hunston
2019. Language patterns and attitude revisited. Functions of Language 26:3  pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Bellés-Fortuño, Begoña
2018. Evaluative language in medical discourse. Languages in Contrast 18:2  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Xuri & Gaixiang Liu
2018. Solving contradictions in semantic prosody analysis with prosody concord. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4  pp. 437 ff. DOI logo
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider & Sharon Millar
2017. The C.O.N.T.A.C.T. Methodological Approach. In Online Hate Speech in the European Union [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Dutra, Rosália
2017. Parallelisms and affectivity in the negotiation of optimal social proximity. Functions of Language 24:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Alba-Juez, Laura
Alba-Juez, Laura
2018. Emotion and appraisal processes in language. In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296],  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Alba-Juez, Laura
2021. Affect and Emotion. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Alba-Juez, Laura
2023. Contrasting Dimensions behind the Use of Irony and Humour in Times of Crisis. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 8:1  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Susan Hunston
2016. Corpora and beyond – investigating evaluation in discourse: introduction to the special issue on corpus approaches to evaluation. Corpora 11:2  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Munday, Jeremy
2015. Engagement and graduation resources as markers of translator/interpreter positioning. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 27:3  pp. 406 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.