Part of
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 4766
References (29)
Bednarek, Monika.
2008Emotion Talk across Corpora. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009“Language patterns and attitude.Functions of Language 16 (2): 165–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolivar, Adriana.
2001“The negotiation of evaluation in written text.” In Mike Scott and Geoff Thompson (eds), 129–58.Google Scholar
Christie, Frances and Martin, J.R.
(eds) 1997Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Cruse, D.A.
1986Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan and Manning, Elizabeth.
1997Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M.
2004Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael.
1983On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
2001Textual Interaction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan.
1993“Evaluation and ideology in scientific discourse.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed), 57–73. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2000“Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and Value in persuasive texts.” In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 176–206.Google Scholar
2011Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Francis, Gill.
Hunston, Susan and Sinclair, John.
2000“A local grammar of evaluation.” In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 74–101.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff
(eds) 2000Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, Michael.
2001“Some discourse patterns and the signalling of the Assessment-Basis relation.” In Mike Scott and Geoff Thompson (eds), 159–92.Google Scholar
Labov, William.
1972“The transformation of experience in narrative syntax.” In Language in the Inner City, William Labov. 354–396. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay.
Macken-Horarik, Mary.
2003“Envoi: intractable issues in appraisal analysis?” In Mary Macken-Horarik and J.R. Martin (eds), 313–319.Google Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary and Martin, J.R.
(eds) 2003Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation. Special issue of Text 23 (2).Google Scholar
Martin, J.R.
2000“Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English.” In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 142–175.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and Rose, David.
2003Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R.
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike and Thompson, Geoff.
(eds) 2001Patterns of Text: In Honour of Michael Hoey. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John.
1988“Mirror for a text.Journal of English and Foreign Languages (Hyderabad, India) 1: 15–44.Google Scholar
2004Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. Edited with Ronald Carter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thetela, Puleng.
1997“Entities and parameters in academic research articles.English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 101–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, P.R.R.
2000“Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging.” In Working with Dialog, Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill and Frances Rock (eds), 67–80. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Winter, Eugene.
1982Towards a Contextual Grammar of English. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Cited by (36)

Cited by 36 other publications

Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Paula Pérez-Sobrino
2024. Developing an annotation protocol for evaluative stance and metaphor in discourse: theoretical and methodological considerations. Text & Talk 44:2  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura, Paula Pérez-Sobrino, Laura Filardo-Llamas, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo, Begoña Núñez-Perucha, Alfonso Sánchez-Moya & Julia T. Williams Camus
2024. A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:2  pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Qingxin
2024. Identifying disputants’ attitudinal variations in family mediations: A data mining approach. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Yoong, Melissa & Nourhan Mohamed
2024. “I felt sad then, I feel free now”: a case for examining the constructive resistance of opted-out mothers. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 43:5  pp. 849 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel, Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio, Katie Jane Patterson, Manuel Moyano & Irene González
2023. They were not radical, even when they committed that. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Cheng, Shi
2023. A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages 0:0 DOI logo
Elyamany, Nashwa
2023. What Buddhist wisdom is going viral? A multimodal-appraisal analysis of a selection of Jay Shetty’s digital narratives. The Social Science Journal 60:2  pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Jing, Yi & Qingxin Xu
2023. Danmu video as the resemiotised: An attitudinal analysis of Home Visit. Media, Culture & Society 45:4  pp. 753 ff. DOI logo
Cao, Feng & Siew Mei Wu
2022. Evaluative Phrase-Frames and Patterns in Doctoral Thesis Conclusions. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 12:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Congcong, Wang
2022. Attitudinal Value of the Ideational in Institutional Discourse: Evidence from Annual Reports of Hanban and British Council. Corpus Pragmatics 6:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Min & Mengfei Gao
2022. Appraisal as co-selection and media performativity: 5G technology imaged in German news discourse. Text & Talk 42:2  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Elizaveta
2022. Clean room, uncomfortable bed. Pragmatics and Society 13:2  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Vilar Lluch, Sara
2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language 29:2  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Pounds, Gabrina
2021. The values of trees and woodland: a discourse-based cross-disciplinary perspective on integrating ‘revealed’ evaluations of nature into environmental agendas. Critical Discourse Studies 18:4  pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Toni, Francesco De
2021. Emotion. In Analysing Religious Discourse,  pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
van Driel, Martine
2021. Chapter 8. Evaluating news events. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36],  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Watanabe, Hideo
2021. The discursive construction of the international dispute over the East China Sea: A multimodal analysis of evaluations in online newspaper editorials in the Chinese and Japanese press. Media Asia 48:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Bolívar, Adriana
2020. Las nociones de <i>texto</i> y <i>contexto</i> en la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional (LSF): aplicaciones, críticas y desarrollos en América Latina. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada :70  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2019. Chapter 12. Rethinking Martin & White’s affect taxonomy. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302],  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2022. “I Am Proud to Be a Traitor”. Pragmatics and Society 13:3  pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Jihua & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2019. Construing Evaluation Through Patterns: Register-specific Variations of the IntroductoryitPattern. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1  pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Donna R.
2019. Language and Literature. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,  pp. 690 ff. DOI logo
Paternoster, Annick
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2019. Chapter 1. Networking engagement in professional practices. In Engagement in Professional Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 301],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Su, Hang & Susan Hunston
2019. Language patterns and attitude revisited. Functions of Language 26:3  pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Tavassoli, Fatemeh, Alireza Jalilifar & Peter RR White
2019. British newspapers’ stance towards the Syrian refugee crisis: An appraisal model study. Discourse & Society 30:1  pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Tupala, Mira
2019. Applying quantitative appraisal analysis to the study of institutional discourse: the case of EU migration documents. Functional Linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Alba-Juez, Laura
2018. Emotion and appraisal processes in language. In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296],  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Alba-Juez, Laura
2021. Affect and Emotion. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Huan, Changpeng
2017. Evaluating news actors in Chinese hard news reporting: language patterns and social values . Text & Talk 38:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Huan, Changpeng
2018. Judgement Patterns. In Journalistic Stance in Chinese and Australian Hard News,  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Huan, Changpeng
2018. Corpus Construction and Annotation. In Journalistic Stance in Chinese and Australian Hard News,  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Márquez, Aurelia Carranza
2017. A functional view on the expression of emotion – the case of Spanish emigration and the media: Politics, manipulation and stance. Discourse & Communication 11:5  pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
Don, Alexanne
2016. “It is hard to mesh all this”: Invoking attitude, persona and argument organisation. Functional Linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Su, Hang
2016. How products are evaluated? Evaluation in customer review texts. Language Resources and Evaluation 50:3  pp. 475 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.