Part of
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 179194
André, Carine, Ghio, Alain, Cavé, Christian and Teston, Bernard.
1995-2003 PERCEVAL: PERCeption EVALuation Auditive & Visuelle, Université d’Aix-en-Provence. Available at [URL] .
Alba-Juez, Laura.
2009Perspectives on Discourse Analysis. Theory and Practice. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars PublishingGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. and Pierrehumbert, Janet.
1986“Intonational structure in Japanese and English”. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David.
2010Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer.   Available at [URL]
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Aoju.
2003“Reaction time as an indicator of discrete intonational contrasts in English”. Eurospeech 2003 Genève. Available at [URL] Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan.
1986Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David.
1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Pijper, Jan R.
1983Modelling British English Intonation. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dolson, Mark.
1994“The pitch of speech as a function of linguistic community”. Music Perception 11: 321–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Hartwig and Laver, John.
1994Menschen und ihre Stimmen: Aspekte der vokalen Kommunikation. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva.
2009Teach Yourself English Pronunciation. A Coruña: Netbiblo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva and Prieto, Pilar.
2008“La notación prosódica del español: una revisión del Sp_ToBI.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental 17: 265–265.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce.
1990“Perspectives on politeness”. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Dafydd.
1998“German intonation”. In Intonation Systems, Daniel Hirst and Albert di Cristo (eds), 78–95. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia M.
1989Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul.
1975“Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts, Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos.
2004The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1967Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert.
1994“Constraints on the gradient variability of pitch range, or, Pitch level 4 lives!” In Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form. Papers in Laboratory Phonology III, Paul A. Keating (ed.), 42–63. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert and Morton, Rachel.
1997“The perception of intonational emphasis: continuous or categorical?Journal of Phonetics 25: 313–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey.
1983Principles of Pragmatics. Singapore: Longman.Google Scholar
Méndez, Jorge.
2009“El scaling tonal como herramienta prosódica de distinción fonológica: un caso de español caraqueño”. (Trabajo de Fin de Módulo). Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Chen, Aoju and Karlsson, Fredrik.
2010“Characterising the internal structure of learner intonation and its development over time”. In Proceedings of New Sounds 2010: The sixth international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech. Poznan University.Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Schaeffler, Felix and Docherty, Gerard.
2007“Pitching it differently: a comparison of the pitch ranges of German and English speakers”. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Jürgen Trouvain and William J. Barry (eds), 1769–1772. Saarbrücken, Germany. Pirrot GmbH: Dudweiler.Google Scholar
2008“A methodological study into the linguistic dimensions of pitch range differences between German and English”. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Speech Prosody. Campinas (Brasil), 527–530.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás.
1974Manual de Entonación Española. Madrid: Guadarrama. (First edition 1944. New York: Spanish Institute in the United States).Google Scholar
O’Connor, Joseph D. and Arnold, Gordon.
1973The Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet.
1980The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. MIT, Massachusetts: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio.
1993Tratado de Fonología y Fonética Españolas. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Savino, Michaelina and Grice, Martine.
2007“The role of pitch range in realising pragmatic contrasts: the case of two question types in Italian”. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Jürgen Trouvain and William J. Barry (eds.), 1037–1040. Saarbrücken, Germany. Pirrot GmbH: Dudweiler.Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R.
2000“A cross-cultural investigation of emotion inferences from voice and speech: implications for speech technology”. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 2, B. Yuan, T. Huang, and X. Tang (eds.), 379–382. Beijing: China Military Friendship Publish.Google Scholar
Van Bezooijen, Renee.
1995“Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women”. Language and Speech 38: 253–65.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanrell, Maria del Mar.
2006The Phonological Role of Tonal Scaling in Majorcan Catalan Interrogatives. (Research Project). Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
2007“Effect of utterance length on F0 scaling”. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Jürgen Trouvain and William J. Barry (eds.), 1165–1168. Saarbrücken, Germany. Pirrot GmbH: Dudweiler.Google Scholar
Wells, John C.
2006English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Alvarado, Covadonga Sánchez & Meghan Armstrong
2022. Prosodic Marking of Object Focus in L2 Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:1  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Bogach, Natalia, Elena Boitsova, Sergey Chernonog, Anton Lamtev, Maria Lesnichaya, Iurii Lezhenin, Andrey Novopashenny, Roman Svechnikov, Daria Tsikach, Konstantin Vasiliev, Evgeny Pyshkin & John Blake
2021. Speech Processing for Language Learning: A Practical Approach to Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Teaching. Electronics 10:3  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Kučiš, Vlasta & Simona Majhenič
2018. Cultural and stress-related manifestations of political controversial language in the European Parliament from the view of interpreters. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 64:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Kent
2023. A comparative analysis of English nuclear stress principles in conversation. Topics in Linguistics 24:1  pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
2019. The Nature of Pronunciation. In English Pronunciation Teaching and Research [Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Alvarado, Covadonga, Alba Arias, Eduardo García Fernández, Isaac McAlister & Meghan E. Armstrong
Sánchez-Mompeán, Sofía
2019. Chapter 9. More than words can say. In Reassessing Dubbing [Benjamins Translation Library, 148],  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.