Cover not available
Part of
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 241–258

Register diversification in evaluative language: the case of scientific writing

ORCID logo
In this chapter, we investigate register diversification in evaluative language focusing on scientific writing. For this purpose, we explore selected epistemic and attitudinal variants of evaluative expressions. We consider (1) the situational context of these expressions according to Systemic Functional Linguistics and register theory (cf. Halliday and Hasan 1985; Biber 2006) and (2) selected aspects of their syntagmatic contexts (cf. Hunston 2011). The research questions we pose are (a) which typical evaluative expressions occur in scientific research articles and (b) whether the usage of particular evaluative expressions is rather discipline-specific or discipline-neutral. To answer these questions, we carry out a corpus-based analysis on a corpus of scientific research articles from nine scientific disciplines, combining quantitative and qualitative analytic methods.
Published online: 4 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.12deg
References (23)
References
Biber, Douglas. 1993. “Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies.” Computational Linguistics 19 (2): 219–242.Google Scholar
1995. Dimensions of Register Variation. A Cross Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig and Leech, Geoffrey. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 2000. “Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis.” In Evaluation in Text, Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 38–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan and Biber, Douglas. 2000. “Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing.” In Evaluation in Text, Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 56–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Degaetano, Stefania and Teich, Elke. 2011. “The lexico-grammar of stance: an exploratory analysis of scientific texts.” In Bochumer Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 3 - Beyond Semantics: Corpus-based Investigations of Pragmatic and Discourse Phenomena, Stefanie Dipper and Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 57–66. Bochum: BLA.Google Scholar
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, Kermes, Hannah, Lapshinova-Koltunski, Ekaterina, and Teich, Elke. 2012. “Scitex a diachronic corpus for analyzing the development of scientific registers.” In New Methods in Historical Corpus Linguistics [Corpus Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Language - CLIP 3], Paul Bennett, Martin Durrell, Silke Scheible, and Richard J. Whitt (eds). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan. 2005. The CQP Query Language Tutorial. CWB version 2.2.b90. IMS Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985. Language, Context and Text: A Social Semiotic Perspective. [Language and Learning Series]. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2004. “Counting the uncountable: problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus.” In Corpora and Discourse, Morley Partington and Louann Haarman (eds), 157–188. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011. Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. [Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics 13] New York: Routledge (Taylor & Francis).Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Francis, Gill. 2000. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Sinclair, John. 2000. “A local grammar of evaluation.” In Evaluation in Text, Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1997. “Parallel corpora: A real-time approach to language change in progress.” In Corpus-Based Studies in English: Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English-Language Research Based on Computerized Corpora, Magnus Ljung (ed.) 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and White, Peter R.R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation, Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite, Brooke, Julian, Tofiloski, Milan, Voll, Kimberly and Stede, Manfred. 2011. “Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis.” Computational Linguistics 37 (2): 267–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teich, Elke and Fankhauser, Peter. 2010. “Exploring a corpus of scientific texts using data mining.” In Corpus-linguistic applications: Current studies, new directions, Stefan Th. Gries, Stefanie Wulff, and Mark Davies (eds),233–247. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teich, Elke and Holtz, Mônica. 2009. “Scientific registers in contact: An exploration of the lexico-grammatical properties of interdisciplinary discourses.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (4): 524–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2013. Introducing Functional Grammar (3rd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Zhou, Jianglin. 2000. “Evaluation and organization in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts.” In Evaluation in Text, Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 121–141. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Theresa, Hoffmann, Paul, Somasundaran, Swapna, Kessler, Jason, Wiebe, Janyce, Choi, Yejin, Cardie, Claire, Riloff, Ellen and Patwardhan, Siddharth. 2005. “Opinionfinder: A system for subjectivity analysis.” In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dong, Jihua & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2019. Construing Evaluation Through Patterns: Register-specific Variations of the IntroductoryitPattern. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.