Part of
Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht
Edited by Stacey Katz Bourns and Lindsy L. Myers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 244] 2014
► pp. viixiv
Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Catherine O’Connor
1988“Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone.” Language 64: 501–38. DOI logo.Google Scholar
François, Denise
1974 Français parlé: Analyse des unités phoniques et significatives d’un corpus recueilli dans la région parisienne . Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1981 Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987“On the Status of SVO Sentences in French Discourse.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse ed. by S. Russell Tomlin, 217–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988“Presentational Cleft Constructions in Spoken French.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse , ed. by John Haiman, and A. Sandra Thompson, 135–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990“‘What, me worry?’- ‘Mad Magazine Sentences’ Revisited.” Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 215–228.Google Scholar
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
1995“Compositional vs. Constructional Meaning: the Case of French comme N.” In Proceedings of the 5th SALT Conference , ed. by T. Galloway and M. Simons, 186–203. Cornell University.Google Scholar
1996“On the Formal and Functional Relationship between Topics and Vocatives: Evidence from French.” In Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language , ed. by Adele E. Goldberg, 267–288.Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2000a“Prédication seconde et structure informationnelle. La relative de perception comme construction présentative.” Langue Française 127: 49–66. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2001a“A Framework for the Analysis of Cleft Constructions.” Linguistics 39 (3): 463–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001b“Dislocation.” In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook . (Handbücher zur Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 20). vol. 2, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgang Raible, 1050–1078. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004“Un système pour l’analyse de la structure informationnelle des phrases. L’exemple des constructions clivées.” In Structure informationnelle et particules énonciatives. Essai de typologie , ed. by Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest and Shirley Carter-Thomas, 21–62. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud, Julia Bordeaux, and Robert Reichle
2006“Cognitive Constraints on Assertion Scope: The Case of Spoken French parce que.” In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Vol. I: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics, ed. by Jean-Pierre Montreuil and Chiyo Nishida, 143–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud, and Kevin Lemoine
2005Definite Null Objects in (spoken) French. A Construction Grammar Account.” In Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots, ed. by Mirjam Fried and Hans Boas, 157–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud, and Laura A. Michaelis
1998“Sentence Accent in Information Questions: Default and Projection.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 477–544. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud, and Maria Polinsky
1998“Typological Variation in Sentence-focus Constructions.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Papers from the Panels , ed. by Kora Singer et al., 189–206. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A., and Knud Lambrecht
1996“Toward a Construction-Based Model of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition.” Language 72: 215–247. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., and Randy J. LaPolla
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Form . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar