Part of
Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in honor of Knud LambrechtEdited by Stacey Katz Bourns and Lindsy L. Myers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 244] 2014
► pp. vii–xiv
Edited by Stacey Katz Bourns and Lindsy L. Myers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 244] 2014
► pp. vii–xiv
Introduction
References (20)
Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Catherine O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone.”
Language
64: 501–38. 
.
.François, Denise. 1974.
Français parlé: Analyse des unités phoniques et significatives d’un corpus recueilli dans la région parisienne
. Paris: SELAF.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1981.
Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1987. “On the Status of SVO Sentences in French Discourse.” In
Coherence and Grounding in Discourse
ed. by S. Russell Tomlin, 217–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1988. “Presentational Cleft Constructions in Spoken French.” In
Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse
, ed. by John Haiman, and A. Sandra Thompson, 135–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1990. “‘What, me worry?’- ‘Mad Magazine Sentences’ Revisited.”
Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
, 215–228.
. 1994.
Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .
.. 1995. “Compositional vs. Constructional Meaning: the Case of French comme N.” In
Proceedings of the 5th SALT Conference
, ed. by T. Galloway and M. Simons, 186–203. Cornell University.
. 1996. “On the Formal and Functional Relationship between Topics and Vocatives: Evidence from French.” In
Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language
, ed. by Adele E. Goldberg, 267–288.Stanford, CA: CSLI.
. 2000a. “Prédication seconde et structure informationnelle. La relative de perception comme construction présentative.”
Langue Française
127: 49–66. .
.. 2000b. “When Subjects Behave like Objects: An Analysis of the Merging of S and O in Sentence-focus Constructions.”
Studies in Language
24 (3): 611–682. .
.. 2001a. “A Framework for the Analysis of Cleft Constructions.”
Linguistics
39 (3): 463–516.
. 2001b. “Dislocation.” In
Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook
. (Handbücher zur Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 20). vol. 2, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgang Raible, 1050–1078. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2004. “Un système pour l’analyse de la structure informationnelle des phrases. L’exemple des constructions clivées.” In
Structure informationnelle et particules énonciatives. Essai de typologie
, ed. by Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest and Shirley Carter-Thomas, 21–62. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Lambrecht, Knud, Julia Bordeaux, and Robert Reichle. 2006. “Cognitive Constraints on Assertion Scope: The Case of Spoken French parce que.” In
New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Vol. I: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics,
ed. by Jean-Pierre Montreuil and Chiyo Nishida, 143–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lambrecht, Knud, and Kevin Lemoine. 2005. Definite Null Objects in (spoken) French. A Construction Grammar Account.” In
Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots,
ed. by Mirjam Fried and Hans Boas, 157–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lambrecht, Knud, and Laura A. Michaelis. 1998. “Sentence Accent in Information Questions: Default and Projection.”
Linguistics and Philosophy
21: 477–544. .
.Lambrecht, Knud, and Maria Polinsky. 1998. “Typological Variation in Sentence-focus Constructions.” In
Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Papers from the Panels
, ed. by Kora Singer et al., 189–206. Chicago, Illinois.
Michaelis, Laura A., and Knud Lambrecht. 1996. “Toward a Construction-Based Model of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition.”
Language
72: 215–247. .
.Van Valin, Robert D., and Randy J. LaPolla. 1997.
Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Form
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .
.