References (25)
Arnold, Jennifer E., Maria Fagnano, and Michael K Tanenhaus
2003“Disfluencies Signal theee, um, New Information.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32 (1):25–36. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E
1998“Reference Form and Discourse Patterns.” PhD diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
1994“Le fonctionnement de parce que en français parlé contemporain. Description linguistique et implications didactiques.” Thesis, Université de Nancy II.
Declerck, Renaat
1997 When-clauses and Temporal Structure . London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groupe Lambda-l
1975“Car, parce que, puisque.” Revue Romane 10 (2):248–280.Google Scholar
Kerr, Betsy
1983Minnesota Corpus. Available by request from the creator.
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud, Julia Bordeaux, and Robert Reichle
2006“Cognitive Constraints on Assertion Scope: The Case of Spoken French parce que.” In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics : Vol. I: Morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, ed. by Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil and Chiyo Nishida, 143–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Goffic, Pierre
1993 Grammaire de la phrase française . Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk . Third Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McDonald, Janet L
2006“Beyond the Critical Period: Processing-based Explanations for Poor Grammaticality Judgment Performance by Late Second Language Learners.” Journal of Memory and Language 55: 381–401. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Millis, Keith K., and Marcel A. Just
1994“The Influence of Connectives on Sentence Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1):128–147. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Millis, Keith K., Jonathan M. Golding, and Gregory Barker
1995“Causal Connectives Increase Inference Generation.” Discourse Processes 20: 29–49. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
1986“Connecteurs pragmatiques, lois de discours et stratégies interprétatives : parce que et la justification interprétative.” Cahiers de Linguistique 7: 149–167. Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Mouchon, S., Ehrlich, M
. -F., & Loridant, C (1999) “Effets immédiats ou différés du connecteur « parce que » dans la compréhension de phrases ? Réexamen du modèle de Millis et Just (1994). L’année Psychologique , 99(2), 239–269. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Myles, Florence
2007“Using Electronic Corpora in SLA Research.” In French Applied Linguistics , ed. by Dalila Ayoun, 377–399. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, Florence and Rosamond Mitchell
2013French Learner Language Oral Corpora. Retrieved from [URL]
Reali, Florencia, and Morten H. Christiansen
2007“Processing of Relative Clauses is Made Easier by Frequency of Occurrence.” Journal of Memory and Language 57 (1):1–23. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Reichle, Robert V
forthcoming). “Cleft Type and Focus Structure Processing in French.” Language and Cognitive Processes . Early-access version available online: DOI logo.
Reichle, Robert V., Annie Tremblay, and Caitlin Coughlin
under review). “Working Memory Capacity in L2 processing.” DOI logo
Reichle, Robert V
Annie Tremblay and Caitlin Coughlin (2013) “Working-memory Capacity Effects in the Processing of Non-adjacent Subject-verb Agreement: An Event-related Brain Potentials Study.” Selected Proceedings of the 2011 Second Language Research Forum .Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Roland, Douglas, Frederic Dick, and Jeffrey L. Elman
2007“Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A corpus analysis.” Journal of Memory and Language 57 (3):348–379. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wagner, Robert Léon, and Jacqueline Pinchon
1962 Grammaire du français classique et moderne . 2nd ed. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Wells, Justine B., Morten H. Christiansen, David S. Race, Daniel J. Acheson, and Maryellen C. MacDonald
2009“Experience and Sentence Processing: Statistical Learning and Relative Clause Comprehension.” Cognitive Psychology 58 (2):250–71. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wilmet, Marc
1998 Grammaire critique du français . 2nd edition. Paris/Bruxelles: Duculot, Hachette Supérieur.Google Scholar