Cover not available
Part of
Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives
Edited by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249] 2014
► pp. 1–16

Introduction

Published online: 4 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.249.01her
References (58)
References
Auer, Peter. 2000. “Pre- and post-positioning of wenn-clauses in spoken and written German.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives [Topics in English Linguistics 33], ed. by E. Couper-Kuhlen, and B. Kortmann, 173–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1984. “How people use adverbial clauses.” BLS 10: 437–449.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2008. “Subordination, Coordination: Form, Semantics, Pragmatics.” In Subordination and Coordination in North Asian Languages, ed. by Edward J. Vaida, 1–16. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2000. “Concessive Patterns in Conversation.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives [Topics in English Linguistics 33], ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Berndt 
Kortmann, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Asymmetric Events, Subordination, and Grammatical Categories.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 151–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Autonomy and Functionalist Linguistics.” Language 71: 490–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W., and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds). 2009. The Semantics of Clause-Linking. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Explorations in Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press/Bradford.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine, and Wiebke Ramm (eds). 2008, ‘Subordination’ versus ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text: A Cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia. 1993. Grammar in Interaction. Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1987. “Beyond Foreground and Background.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 175–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Alessandro Duranti (eds). 1992. Rethinking Context. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1984. ““Subordination” in Universal Grammar.” BLS 10: 510–523.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho (eds). 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi ( The Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish ). 
Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. “Coordinating Constructions: an Overview.” In Coordinating Constructions, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds). 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 1993. “Are Relative Clauses Either Restrictive or Non-restrictive? A Study of Relative Clauses in the Finnish Pear Stories.” In Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish syntax, ed. by Anders Holmberg, and Urpo Nikanne, 163–176. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, and Ritva Laury. 2008. “Finnish Relative Clauses in Conversation: Main Clauses as Emergent Formulas.” Handout. UCSB Linguistics Department Colloquium , May 5, 2008.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2009. “Relative Clause Structures in Context.” Handout. International Pragmatics Conference , Melbourne, July 2009, Panel on Clause combining in Discourse.
Herlin, Ilona. 1997. Suomen kielen koska-konjunktion merkitys ja merkityksenkehitys [Suomi 183]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1987. “Emergent Grammar”. BLS 13: 139–157.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. “Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. by Ritva Laury, 99–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2001. Textual Interaction. An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. 
London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalliokoski, Jyrki. 1989. Ja. Rinnastus ja rinnastuskonjunktion käyttö. [ Ja. Coordination and the Use the Coordinating Conjunction in Finnish ]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
. 2010. “A Discourse Perspective to Subordination.” In Langues finno-ougriennes: Aspects grammaticaux et typologiques [Cahiers d’etudes hongroises 15], ed. by 
Patrick Renaud, 91–101. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2008. “Clause Combining and Sequenced Actions: The Estonian Complementizer and Pragmatic Particle et.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. by R. Laury, 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, Ritva Laury, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen. 2011. “Syntactic and Actional Characteristics of Finnish että-Clauses.” In Subordination in Conversation. A Cross-linguistic Perspective, ed. by Ritva Laury, and Ryoko Suzuki, 69–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalizations [Theoretical linguistics series]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Berndt. 1997. Adverbial Subordinators. Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol 2: Descriptive Application. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Subordination in Cognitive Grammar.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 137–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva, and Ryoko Suzuki (eds). 2011. Subordination in Conversation. A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen. 2008. “Clause Combining, Interaction, Evidentiality, Participation Structure, and the Conjunction-Particle Continuum: The Finnish että.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining, ed. by Ritva Laury, 153–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. “Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 181–225. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longacre, Robert. 2007. “Sentences as Combination of Predications.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 372–420. New edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, William, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. “Rhetorical Structure Theory. Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8: 243–281.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. “The Structure of Discourse and ‘Subordination’.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Volume 18 of Typological Studies in Language], ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 275–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, and Frances H. Syder. 2000. “The One-clause-at-a-time Hypothesis.” In Perspectives on Fluency, ed. by H. Riggenbach, 164–199. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michi­gan Press.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Violeta. 1987. “The Functional Distribution of Preposed and Postposed “If” and “When” Clauses in Written Discourse.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 383–408. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Elizabeth. 1996. Contrast. Adversative and Concessive Expressions on Sentence and Text Level. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren, and Leo Noordman. 1992. “Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations.” Discourse Processes 15(1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 2007. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions. New edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite and William C. Mann. 2006 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead”. Discourse Studies 8(3): 423–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. Grammar and Written Discourse: Initial vs. Final Purpose Clauses in English.” Text 5: 55–84.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Object Complements” and Conversation: Towards a Realistic Account.” Studies in Language 60 (1): 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S. 1985. “Foreground-Background Information and the Syntax of Subordination”. Text 5: 85–122.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar