Cover not available
Part of
Discourses of Helping Professions
Edited by Eva-Maria Graf, Marlene Sator and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 252] 2014
► pp. 91–122

“Making one’s path while walking with a clear head”

(Re-)constructing clients’ knowledge in the discourse of coaching: Aligning and dis-aligning forms of clients’ participation

ORCID logo
This chapter looks at (re-)constructing clients’ knowledge in coaching which represents an endemic interactive feature of this helping profession that aims to solve clients’ business-related concerns by developing concrete solutions tor their problems. The professional norm of enabling help for self-help locates all relevant information in the clients’ territory of knowledge. A dilemma may arise for professionals when clients dis-align in the construction of a solution, given that concrete plans of actions are required but should be developed co-actively based on the clients’ own knowledge. The chapter tackles the interactive consequences of such dis-aligning forms in one coaching session between a coach in training and his client. Data excerpts, analyzed with the help of (applied) conversation analysis, illustrate the coach’s strategies when struggling with this professional dilemma and the client’s strategies to resist the professional’s attempts to non-directively keep her on track.
Published online: 18 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.252.05sat
References (56)
References
Antaki, Charles. 2008. “Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Annsi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Six Kinds of Applied Conversation Analysis.” In Applied Conversation Analysis. Intervention and Change in Institutional Setting, ed. by Charles Antaki, 1–14. 
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Maxwell, and John Heritage (eds). 1984. Structures of Social Interaction. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Elizabeth, and John Heritage. 2006. “Taking the Patient’s Medical History: Questioning during Comprehensive History Taking.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage, and Douglas W. Maynard, 151–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavanagh, Michael, Anthony Grant, and Travis Kemp (eds). 2005. Evidence-Based Coaching. Volume 1: Theory, Research and Practice form the Behavioural Sciences. Bowen Hills: 
Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2000. “Concessive Patterns in Conversations.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 381–410. Berlin/New York: 
Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, Elaine, Tatiana Bachkirova, and David Clutterbuck(eds). 2010. The Complete Handbook of Coaching. Sage: London.Google Scholar
Depperman, Arnulf. 2001. Gespräche Analysieren. Eine Einführung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Agency in Angstdarstellungen.”, Paper presented at the conference “Angst, Anfall und Dissoziation”, Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Forschung, Bielefeld, 6.–8.1.2005.
Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad, and Jochen Rehbein. 1976. “Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT).” Linguistische Berichte 45: 21–41.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan, and Alice Freed. 2010. “The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse: An Introduction.” In “Why do you ask?” The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick. 2011. “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction: Enchrony, Status, Knowledge and Agency.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 2000. “The Treatment of Contrasts in Interaction.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 283–311. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freed, Alice, and Susan Ehrlich (eds). 2010. “Why do you ask?” The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria. 2007. “I’m not Embarrassed” – “A little … uncomfortable? Is that nearer?” The Negotiation for Meaning in the Discourse of Coaching.” In Current Trends in Pragmatics, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Joanna Nijakowska, 281–302. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
. in prep. The Discourse (s) of Executive Coaching. An Applied Linguistic Analysis. Habilitationsschrift Universität Klagenfurt.
Grant, Anthony. 2005. “What is Evidence-Based Executive, Workplace and Life Coaching?” In Evidence-Based Coaching. Theory, Research and Practice from the Behavioural Sciences, ed. by Michael Cavanagh, Anthony Grant, and Travis Kemp, 1–12. Australian Academic Press: Bowen Hills.Google Scholar
Greif, Siegfried. 2008. Coaching und ergebnisorientierte Selbstreflexion. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Gülich, Elisabeth. 2003. “Conversational Techniques used in Transferring Knowledge between Medical Experts and Non-Experts.” Discourse Studies 5 (2): 235–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Michael, and Michelle Duval. 2004. Meta-Coaching. Volume I: Coaching Change. For Higher Levels of Success and Transformation. Clifton: Neuro-Semantics Publications.Google Scholar
Heritage, John 2011. “Territories of Knowledge and Experience.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Douglad Maynard (eds). 2006. Communication in Medical Care. Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2002. “Resisting the Incitement to Talk in Child Counseling: Aspects of the Utterance ‘I don’t know’.” Discourse Studies 4 (2): 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Discourse of Child Counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of Information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koester, Almut. 2010. Workplace Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse. Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lucius-Hoene, Gabriele, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2002. Rekonstruktion narrativer Identität. Ein Arbeitsbuch zur Analyse narrativer Interviews. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter. 2013. “Resistance in Couples Counselling: Sequences of Talk that Disrupt Progressivity and Promote Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 49: 18–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, and Kwok Tim Choi. 2010. “Not Remembering as a Practical Epistemic Resource in Couples Therapy.” Discourse Studies 12 (3): 331–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peltier, Bruce. 2010. The Psychology of Executive Coaching. Theory and Application. 2nd edition, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peräkyälä, Annsi, Joanna Ruusuvuori, and Sanna Vehviläinen. 2005. “Introduction: Professional Theories and Institutional Interaction.” Communication and Medicine 2 (2): 105–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkyla, Anssi, and Sanna Vehviläinen. 2003. “Conversation Analysis and the Professional Stocks of Interactional Knowledge.” Discourse and Society 14 (6): 727–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pitsis, Alexandra. 2008. “Coaching.” In International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, ed. by Stewart Clegg, and James Bailey, 172–179. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Poetschki, Janina, and Monika Wastian. 2012. “Coaching-Ziele klären und erreichen – was ist wirklich SMART?”. Paper presented at the Symposium für Qualitätssicherung im Coaching, München.
Rehbein, Jochen, Thomas Schmidt, Bernd Meyer, Franziska Watzke, and Annette Herkenrath. 2004. Handbuch für das computergestützte Transkribieren nach HIAT. Hamburg: Sonderforschungsbereich 538 Mehrsprachigkeit der Universität Hamburg. (= Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit / Working Papers in Multilingualism – Folge B / Series B, Vol. 56/2004).Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2001. “On Demarcating the Space between ‘Lay Expertise’ and ‘Expert Laity’.” Text 21 (1/2): 3–11.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Discourse Practitioners as a Community of Interprofessional Practice: Some Insights from Health Communication Research.” In Research and Practice in Professional Discourse, ed. by Christopher Candlin, 95–135. Hong Kong: City of University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. “The Spatial and Temporal Dimension of Reflective Questions in Genetic Counselling.” In “Why do you ask?” The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 235–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Celia Roberts. 1999. “The Dynamics of Interactional and Institutional Orders in Work-Related Settings.” In Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Celia Roberts, 1–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Christopher Candlin. 2011. “Professional and Organisational Practice: A Discourse/Communication Perspective.” In Handbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions, ed. by Christopher Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 3–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Florian. 2013. The Psycho-Managerial Complex at Work: A Study of the Discursive Practice of Management Coaching. University of St. Gallen, Thesis. Bamberg: Difo-Druck.Google Scholar
Schwabe, Maike. 2006. ““Ich weiß das ja jetzt am besten auch.” Agency im Sprechen anfallskranker Kinder und Jugendlicher.” Gesprächsforschung Online 7: 201–223.Google Scholar
Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew. 2008. “Introduction: Questioning and Affiliation/Disaffiliation in Interaction.” Discourse Studies February 10: 5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints. ” Language in Society 39 (1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Stivers Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–24.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Ulrich. 2004. Auf den ersten Blick. Psychotherapeutische Beziehung unter dem Mikroskop. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Tolan, Janet. 2003. Skills in Person Centered Counselling and Psychotherapy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2003. “The Discourse-Knowledge Interface.” In Multidisciplinary CDA, ed. by Gilbert Weiss, and Ruth Wodak, 85–109. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2008. “Identifying and Managing Resistance in Psychoanalytic Interaction.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkyla, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 120–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, Laura, Karen Kimsey-House, and Philip Sandahl. 1998. Co-active Coaching. New Skills for Coaching People toward Success in Work and Life. Palo Alto: Davis-Black Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Graf, Eva-Maria
2015. Linguistische Evaluation eines Coaching-Prozesses – Die Ko-Konstruktion der Veränderung durch Coach und Klientin. In Bewertung von Coachingprozessen, ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Graf, Eva-Maria
2018. Äußerung für Äußerung zum Coaching-Prozess. In Coaching-Prozessforschung, ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.