Cover not available
Part of
The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 1–14

Introduction

| Northeastern Illinois University, USA
| Bar-Ilan University, Israel
| University of Augsburg, Germany
Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.001int
References (31)
References
Atifi, Hassan, and Michel Marcoccia. 2012. “Follow-Ups in Online Political Discussions.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 22–34. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL: [URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962/1976. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent. 1992. “Communicative Intentions, Plan Recognition, and Pragmatics: Comments on Thomason and Littman and Allen.” In Intentions in Communication, ed. by Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan and Martha E. Pollack, 389–400. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Lawrence N. 2007. “Cooperative Conflict and Evasive Language: The Case of the 9–11 Commission Hearings.” In Context and Appropriateness: Micro Meets Macro, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 176–215. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Fighting Words: Hybrid Discourse and Discourse Processes.” In Context and Contexts, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 41–65. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter. 2015. “Follow-Ups in Broadcast Political Discourse: Speeches, Interviews, and Parliamentary Questions.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneš, František. 1974. “Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text.” In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, ed. by František Daneš, 106–128. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ensink, Titus. 2015. “Framing the Queen’s Head Scarf: A Case Study on Follow-Ups in Dutch Politics.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2002. “Communicative Intentions in Context.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 37–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Challenges in Political Interviews: An Intercultural Analysis.” In Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Gerda Lauerbach, 163–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1974. "Some Aspects of the Chechoslovak Approach to Problems of Functional Sentence Perspective." In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, ed.by Františ e Danee (ed.), 11–37. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Luk van Langenhove. 1991. “Varieties of Positioning.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 21 (4): 393–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse. Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Speech Acts in Context.” In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etskuo Oishi, 171–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikalayeva, Liudmila. 2015. “Follow-ups in Pre-Structured Communication. A Case of Treaty Monitoring.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Christoph. 2015. “Follow-Ups in Political Talk Shows and their Visual Framing.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 1992. “Speech Acts, Effects and Responses.” In (On) Searle on Conversation, ed. by John R. Searle, Hermann Parret and Jef Verschueren, 101–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002a. “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. “Speech Acts in Context.” Language and Communication 22(4): 421–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffener, Christina. 2015. “Follow-Ups in Interpreter-Mediated Interviews and Press Conferences.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Conversation Revisited.” In (On) Searle on Conversation, ed. by John R. Searle, Hermann Parret and Jef Verschueren, 137–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1980. Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2012. “Negotiating Irony through Follow-Ups: Readers’ Comments on Op-Eds in the Daily Press.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 263–276. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL: [URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kleinke, Sonja
2023.  Top-down meets bottom-up. In Remedies against the Pandemic [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 102], ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.