Exploring specific differences
A cross-linguistic study of English and Spanish civil engineering metaphors
This chapter provides a cross-linguistic and multimodal study of some civil engineering zoomorphic metaphors in English and Spanish within a socio-cognitive and multimodal approach. This study thus aims to examine the interaction of multimodal (linguistic and visual) metaphoric and metonymic mappings (Forceville 2009, 2010) in some civil engineering zoomorphic examples. Principles from discourse analysis are applied (Semino 2008; Deignan 2005) by using contextualized and corpora-driven data. The results reveal lop-sided layers of metaphoricity merged with interacting metonymic patterns. In the cross-linguistic analysis, significant variations appear between English and Spanish which may respond to lexical aspects of meaning construction patterns as well as sociocultural differences (Kövecses 2008).
References (47)
References
ASCE: American Society of Civil Engineers. 2007. “Summit on the Future of the Civil Engineering Profession in 2025”. [URL] (Retrieved 2nd April 2013).
Barcelona, Antonio and Cristina Soriano. 2002. “Metaphorical Conceptualization in English and Spanish”. European Journal of English Studies 8 (3): 295–307. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad and Pandi Reppen. 2000. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blockley, David. 2005. A New Dictionary of Civil Engineering. London: Penguin Reference.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caballero, Rosario. 2003. “Talking about Space: Image Metaphor in Architectural Discourse”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1: 89–108.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caballero, Rosario. 2014. “Thinking, Drawing and Writing Architecture through Metaphor”. Ibérica 28: 155–180.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chun Jiang and Fan Yu. 2008. “Cultural Metaphors in China: A Visual Experience of Hierarchy and Status Symbols”. Intercultural Communication Studies XVII (1): 71–78.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cuadrado, Georgina, Irina Argüelles, Pilar Durán, María-José Gómez, Silvia Molina,
Joana Pierce, María Mar Robisco, Ana Roldán-Riejos and Paloma Úbeda. 2016. Bilingual Spanish-English and English-Spanish Dictionary of Scientific-Technical Metaphors and Metonymies. Engineering, Architecture and Physical Activities Science. London: Routledge.
Durán, Pilar. 1999. “Teaching Writing through Reading: A Text-Centered Approach”. Ibérica 1: 55–62.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, Charles J. and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds). 2009. “Introduction”. Multimodal Metaphor, 3–17. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, Charles. 2009. “Non-verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist Framework: Agendas for Research”. In Multimodal Metaphor, ed. by Charles Forceville and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds), 19–44. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, Charles. 2010. “Why and How Study Metaphor, Metonymy, and Other Tropes in Multimodal Discourse”. In Ways and Modes of Human Communication, ed. by Rosario Caballero and María J. Pinar, 57–77. Cuenca: Ed. Universidad Castilla-La Mancha.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition). London:
Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken. 2006. “English for Specific Purposes: Some Influences and Impacts” In International Handbook of English Language Education, Part 1, ed. by Jim Cummins and Chris Davison, 391–402. Springer: Norwell Mass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnston, Stephen, Alison Lee and Helen McGregor. 1996. “Engineering as Captive Discourse”. PHIL & TECH 1 (3–4): 1–14. Available from: [URL](Retrieved: 17th February 2014).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2011. “Civil Engineering Research Article Introductions: Textual Structure and Linguistic Characterization”. The Asian ESP Journal 7 (2): 55–84.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2008. “Universality and Variation in the Use of Metaphor”. In Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals, ed. by Nils Lennart Johannesson and David Minugh, 51–74. Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor” In Metaphor and Thought. 2nd Edition, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George and Rafael Nuñez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martín-Herrero, Cristina. 2009. “Notas sobre terminología de origen zoonímico en la Ingeniería renacentista”. Res Diachronicae 7: 251–260.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molina, Silvia. 2012. “Non-verbal Markers of Modality and Evidentiality in MarENG”. LFE: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos 18: 45–70.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musolff, Andreas. 2012. “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Critical Discourse Studies 9: 3, 301–310. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ponderotto, Daniel. 2003. “The Cohesive Role of Cognitive Metaphor in Conversation and Discourse” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, ed. by Antonio Barcelona, 283–299. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poveda, Paloma. 2010. “La estructura retórica de la memoria de arquitectura de divulgación: un análisis de género” [The rhetoric structure of the architecture annual report: a genre analysis]. Ibérica 19: 55–76.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Putnan, Robert and G.E. Carlsson. 1988. Diccionario de Arquitectura, Construcción y Obras Públicas: Inglés- Español/Español-Inglés [Dictionary of Architecture, Construction and Public Works: English-Spanish/Spanish-English]. Madrid: Paraninfo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robisco, María-Mar and Georgina Cuadrado. 2013. “Metaphor and Genre: An Approach to Improve the Learning Process of English for Aeronautics” RESLA 13 (1): 209–228.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roldán-Riejos, Ana and Paloma Úbeda Mansilla. 2013. “Metaphor in the ESP engineering context”. Ibérica 25: 107–126.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roldán-Riejos, Ana. 2013. “Types of metaphor in Civil Engineering Communication”. In Communication and Learning Context in LSP: New Perspectives on Genre Analysis, ed. by Ana Roldán-Riejos and Silvia Molina. Vol. 13 (1): 105–122. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roldán-Riejos, Ana and Paloma Úbeda Mansilla. 2006. “Metaphor Use in a Specific Genre of Engineering Discourse”. European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (5): 531–541. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roldán-Riejos, Ana. 2004. “Strategic Features of ESP from a Socio-Cognitive perspective”. Ibérica 7: 33–51.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. and Olga I. Díez Velasco. 2002. “Patterns of conceptual interaction”. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, ed. by René Dirven and Ralf Pörings, 489–453. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
St. Clair, Robert. 2002. “Metaphorical Blends, Recruited Frames and Metaphors across Cultures”. Intercultural Communication Studies 11 (3): 1–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swales, John. 2011. “The Concept of Discourse Community.” In: Writing About Writing: A College Reader, ed. by Elizabeth Wardle and Doug Downs, 466–480. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Úbeda Mansilla, Paloma. 2002. “Metaphor at Work: A Study of Metaphors Used by European Architects when Talking about Their Projects”. Ibérica 5: 35–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jorg Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics.
Oxford: Pearson Education Limited.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Geoffrey. 2001. “Mediating between Lexis and Texts: Collocational Networks in Specialized Corpora”. ASp [En ligne]: 31–33. URL: [URL]. (Retrieved: 28th February 2014).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yus, Francisco. 2009. “Visual Metaphor versus Verbal Metaphor: A Unified Account”. In Multimodal Metaphor, ed. by Charles Forceville and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi, 147–173. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zinken, Jorg, Hellsten, Ilina, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2008. “Discourse Metaphors”. In Body, Language, and Mind: Sociocultural Situatedness (Vol. 2), ed. by René Dirven, Roselyn Frank and Enrique Bernardez, 363–383. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.