Cover not available
Part of
Gender, Language and the Periphery: Grammatical and social gender from the margins
Edited by Julie Abbou and Fabienne H. Baider
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 264] 2016
► pp. 1–22

Periphery, gender, language

An introduction

 | Aix-Marseille University
ORCID logo | University of Cyprus
Published online: 16 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.264.01abb
References (77)
References
Abbou, Julie. 2011. “Double Gender Marking in French: A Linguistic Practice of Antisexism.” Current Issues in Language Planning 12 (1): 55–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. “Voice, Footing, Enregisterment.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 38–59. DOI logo Google Scholar
Ahlers, Jocelyn C. (ed). 2012. Gender and Language – Special Issue on Endangered Languages 6(2).Google Scholar
Anchimbe, Eric (ed). 2007. Linguistic Identity in Postcolonial Multilingual Spaces. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar
Angenot, Marc. 1982. La Parole pamphlétaire. Contributions à la typologie des discours modernes. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Atanga, Lilian Lem, Sibonile Edith Ellece, Lia Litosseliti, and Jane Sunderland. 2013. Gender and Language in Sub-Saharan Africa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baider, Fabienne, and Evelyne Jacquey. 2010. “Substantive Dis-Embodiement, Syntactic Embed- ment.” In Feminism, Femininity and Gendered Discourse, ed. by Janet Holmes and Meredith Marra, 145–167. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Baider, Fabienne. 2010. “De l’infinitude. Féminisation, Variation, Représentations lexicographiques.” In La Voix des Français, ed. by Michael Abecassis and Gudrun Ledegen, 123–137. Peter Lang: Berne.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2011 [1949]. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Bell hooks. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margins to Center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1974. Problème de linguistique générale 2. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Blackwood Pickrel, Laura. 2013. “High Stakes Whack-a-Mole: Noticing and Naming Sexism in the Church.” In Talking Taboo, ed. by Erin Lane and Enuma Okoro, 41–47. Berkeley: White Cloud Press.Google Scholar
Broomans, Petra, and Margriet van der Waal (eds). 2002. Peripheral Feminisms: Literary and Sociological Approaches. Groningen: Centre for Gender Studies.Google Scholar
Burr, Elisabeth. 2012. “Planification linguistique et féminisation.” In Intersexion. À l’intersection des études genre et des sciences du langage, ed. by Fabienne Baider and Daniel Elmiger, 29–40. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1992. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. New York: St Martin’s Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, and Don Kulick. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connell, Robert W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Crane, Gregory R. (ed). Perseus Digital Library. Cambridge: Tufts University. [URL] (accessed May 24, 2016).
Crenshaw, Kimberley. 1993. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43: 1240–1299.Google Scholar
Endsjø, D.Ø. 2008. “The Queer Periphery: Sexual Deviancy and the Cultural Understanding of Space.” Journal of Homosexuality 54 (1/2): 9–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
. 1994. Dits et écrits, vol. IV, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Greco, Luca. 2013. “Exhumer le corps du placard : pour une linguistique queer du corps king.” In Écritures du corps. Nouvelles perspectives, ed. by Pierre Zoberman, Anne Tomiche, and William J. Spurlin, 269–289. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Grisay, Auguste, George Lavis, and Martine Dubois-Stasse. 1969. Les dénominations de la femme dans les anciens textes littéraires français. Publications de l’ Institut de Lexicologie Française de l’Université de Liège. Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1992. “Cultural Studies and its Theoretical Legacies.” In Cultural Studies, ed. by Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson, and Paula Treicher, 277–286. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hämäläinen, Pekka, and Samuel Truett. 2011. “On Borderlands.” The Journal of American History 98 (2): 338–361. DOI logo Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. DOI logo Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis, and Hadumod Bussmann. 2001. Gender Across Languages T.1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo Google Scholar
. 2002. Gender Across Languages T.2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo Google Scholar
. 2003. Gender Across Languages T.3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1998. “Generic Pronouns in the Wellington Corpus of Spoken New Zealand English.” Kotare 1 (1): 31–39.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Social Constructionism, Postmodernism and Feminist Sociolinguistics.” Gender and Language 1 (1): 51–66. DOI logo Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey Pullum. 2008. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina. 1988. “The Core/Periphery Distinction in Language Acquisition.” Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics vol. 4.
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Selected Writings, vol. II. World and Language. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 1997. “On the Linguistics of Marginality: The Centrality of the Periphery.” In Papers from the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Kora Singer, Randall Eggert, and Gregory Anderson, 197–213. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Koch, Michaela. 2008. Language and Gender Research from a Queer Linguistic Perspective. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don. 2010. “Humorless Lesbians.” In Femininity, Feminism and Gendered Discourse, ed. by Janet Holmes and Meredith Marra, 59–83. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Lazović, Vesna. 2009. “Cross-cultural Semantic Equivalence of some Gender-Related Words.” ELOPE 6 (2): 7–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leap, William. 2008. “Queering Gay Men’s English.” In Language and Gender Research Meth- odologies, ed. by Kate Harrington, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson, and Jane Sunderland, 408–429. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs 30 (3): 1771–1800. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michard, Claire. 1996. “Genre et sexe en linguistique: les analyses du masculin générique.” Mots, Les langages du politique 49: 29–47.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Humain/femelle : deux poids deux mesures dans la catégorisation de sexe en français.” Nouvelles Questions Féministes 20 (1): 53–95.Google Scholar
. 2002. Le Sexe en linguistique. Sémantique ou zoologie ? Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2010. Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo Google Scholar
Munson, Elizabeth. 2002. “Walking on the Periphery: Gender and the Discourse of Modernization.” Journal of Social History 36 (1): 63–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, and Carolyn Taylor. 1995. “The Father Knows Best Dynamic in Dinnertime Narratives.” In Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, ed. by Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz, 92–121. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pan, Wenguo, and Wai Mun Tham. 2007. Contrastive Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 1998. English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Translingual English.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 31 (3): 30.1–30.9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perseus Digital Library. Gregory R. Crane (Ed.), Tufts University. [URL] (accessed September 17, 2016).
Pietikainen, Sari, and Helen Kelly-Holmes. 2013. Multilingualism and the Periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo Google Scholar
Prewitt-Freilino, Jennifer L., Andrew T. Caswell, and Emmi. K. Laakso. 2012. “The Gendering of Language: A Comparison of Gender Equality in Countries with Gendered, Natural Gender, and Genderless Languages.” Sex Roles 66: 268–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rofel, Lisa. 2007. Desiring China: Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logo Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 (3): 192–233. DOI logo Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Karen, and Toni-Michelle Travis. 2011. The Meaning of Difference: American Constructions of Race, Sex and Gender, Social Class, Sexual Orientation, and Disability. New York, Chicago: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ruitert, Jan Jaap de. 2008. “Morocco’s Languages and Gender: Evidence from the Field.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 190: 103–119.Google Scholar
Sadiqi, Fatima. 2003. Women, Gender and Language in Morocco. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schulz, Muriel. 1975. “The Semantic Derogation of Woman.” In Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, ed. by Barrie Thorne and Nancy Henley, 64–75. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1986. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.” The American Historical Review 91 (5): 1053–1075. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohat, Ella. 2001. “Area Studies, Transnationalism, and the Feminist Production of Knowledge.” Signs 26 (4): 1269–1272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silaški, Nadežda. 2013. “Animal metaphors and semantic derogation. Do women think differently from men?” Gender Studies 12 (1): 319–332.Google Scholar
Skrebtsova, Tatiana. 2014. “The Concepts ‘Centre’ and ‘Periphery’ in the History of Linguistics: From Field Theory to Modern Cognitivism.” Respectus Philologicu 26 (31): 144–151.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale. 1980. Man Made Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Symanski, Richard. 1981. The Immoral Landscape: Female Prostitution in Western Societies. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Trechter, Sara. 1995. “Categorical Gender Myths in Native America: Gender Deictics in Lakhota.” Issues in Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 5–22.Google Scholar
Trier, Jost. 1973. “Altes und Neues vom sprachlichen Feld.” In Aufsätze und Vorträge zur Wortfeldtheorie, ed. by Anthony van der Lee and Oskar Reichmann, 188–199. The Hague, Paris: Mouton. DOI logo Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef. 1966. “On the Integration of the Peripheral Eelements into the System of Language.” Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2: 23–37. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Violi, Patrizia. 1987. “Les origines du genre grammatical.” Langages 85: 15–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel, Terence K. Hopkins, et al.. 1982. World-Systems Analysis: Theory and Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
West, Candace, and Don Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender and Society 1: 125–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiaoping, Yan. 2008. “Gender-specific Asymmetries in Chinese Language.” MP: An Online Feminist Journal 2 (1): 31–41.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Borba, Rodrigo & Adriana Carvalho Lopes
2019. Archi-écritures de genre et politiques de différance : immondices verbales et littéracies d’intervention dans le quotidien des établissements scolaires. GLAD! :07 DOI logo
Hadjidemetriou, Chryso
2016. When She and He become It. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.