Cover not available
Part of
Gender, Language and the Periphery: Grammatical and social gender from the margins
Edited by Julie Abbou and Fabienne H. Baider
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 264] 2016
► pp. 25–46

Trying to change a gender-marked language

Classical vs. Modern Hebrew

Classical and Modern Hebrew are gender-marked in all morphological forms, and the rules of Hebrew syntax require gender agreement. Consequently, it is next to impossible to find a sentence without gender determination. Masculine content words are unmarked, while feminine words are derived from them. Masculine forms are also used generically, making them more visible than the feminine. Feminine function words, mainly pronouns, were used in classical periods for the masculine as well, leaving less specific features for the feminine. We could expect that feminist speakers would try to change this practice in Modern Hebrew despite the rigid linguistic structure. However, there have been only a few gender changes, mostly in one direction: using masculine, but not feminine forms, for both sexes. This article provides examples of this sociolinguistic change and explains why it has taken this direction.
Keywords: gender markedness, Hebrew, linguistic changes, masculinization
Published online: 16 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.264.02muc
References (39)
References
Bendavid, Abba. 1971. Biblical Hebrew and Mishnaic Hebrew vol. 2. Tel Aviv: Dvir. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Bernstein, Deborah. 1987. The Struggle for Equality: Urban Women Workers in Prestate Israeli Society. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera, Lauden A. Schmidt, and Webb Phillips. 2003. “Sex, Syntax, and Semantics.” In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition, ed. by Dedre Gentner, and Susan Goldin-Meadow, 61–80. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1990. “Demythologizing Sociolinguistics: Why Language Does Not Reflect Society.” In Ideologies of Language, ed. by John E. Joseph, and Talbot J. Taylor, 79–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, Mary. 2001. “How a Language Gender System Creeps into Perception.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32(1): 18–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadish, Ronit. 1998. “The Academy and the Speakers of Hebrew.” Leshonenu La’am 49(2): 58–64. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Guiora, Alexander, Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, Risto Fried, and Cecelia Yoder. 1982. “Language Environment and Gender Identity Attainment.” Language Learning 32: 289–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis. 1988. “Revising the Patriarchal Paradigm: Language Change and Feminist Language Politics.” In Language, Power and Ideology, ed. by Ruth Wodak, 273–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvits, Miri. 1999. “First Person in Second Person: Discursive Analysis of a Pseudo Second Person Pronoun.” In Hebrew – A Living Language vol. 2, ed. by Rina Ben-Shahar, and Gideon Toury, 75–90. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Izraeli, Dafna. 1981. “The Zionist Women’s Movement in Palestine, 1911–1927 – A Sociological Analysis.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7: 87–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Andrea M. 2004. Language Reform as Language Ideology: An Examination of Israeli Feminist Language Practice. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Kantor, Hadassah, and Malka Muchnik. 1999. “Marked and Unmarked Directives in Modern Hebrew.” In Contemporary Journalistic Language: Memorial Book to Mina Efron, ed. by Miri Horvits, 134–147. Tel-Aviv: Mofet. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Khaznadar, Edwige. 2002. Le Féminin à la Française: Académisme et Langue Française. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don. 2010. “Humorless Lesbians”. In Femininity, Feminism and Gendered Discourse, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Meredith Marra, 59–83. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar. 2006. “Gender Online in Hebrew: New Technology, Old Language.” In Corpus Linguistics and Gender: A Multilingual Analysis of an Electronic Corpus, ed. by Eva-Maria Thüne, Simona Leonardi, and Carla Bazzanella, 169–181. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar, and Illil Yatziv. 2012. “Functional Changes of Person, Tense and Mood in Spoken Discourse.” In Studies in Modern Hebrew and Jewish Languages – In Honor of Ora Schwarzwald, ed. by Malka Muchnik, and Tsvi Sadan, 461–472. Jerusalem: Carmel. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Malchiel, Zehava, and Nira Fradkin. 1987. Equal Treatment for Boys and Girls in Textbooks. Jerusalem: The Ministry of Education. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Meir, Irit. 2008. “The Role of Prosody in Morphological Change: The Case of Hebrew Bound Numerals.” Language Variation and Change 20: 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Megan, and Lori James. 2009. “Is the Generic Pronoun He Still Comprehended as Excluding Women?” American Journal of Psychology 122(4): 483–496.Google Scholar
Mordechai, Anat. Forthcoming. Ambiguous Gender Identity and the Use of Language Variations. PhD dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2010. Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muchnik, Malka. 2012. “Is It Possible to Avoid Sexism in Hebrew?” In Studies in Modern Hebrew and Jewish Languages – In Honor of Ora Schwarzwald, ed. by Malka Muchnik, and Tsvi Sadan, 487–505. Jerusalem: Carmel. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Language and Gender.” In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics vol. 2, ed. by Geoffrey Khan, 17–20. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Gender Variations in Hebrew.” In Gender-Linked Variation across Languages, ed. by Yousif Elhindi, and Theresa McGarry, 36–49. Champaign, IL: Common Ground.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Gender Challenge of Hebrew. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ordan, Noam, and Shuly Wintner. 2005. “Representing Natural Gender in Multilingual Databases.” International Journal of Lexicography 18(3): 357–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, Anne. 1998. Women Changing Language. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Linguistic Sexism and Feminist Linguistic Activism.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 550–570. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia. 2003. “Women, Gender and Modern Greek.” In Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men vol. 3, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bussmann, 175–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit. 1995. “Neutralization of Gender Distinction in Modern Hebrew Numerals.” Language Variation and Change 7: 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1997. “Gender, Grammar, and the Space in between.” In Communicating Gender in Context, ed. by Helga Kotthoff, and Ruth Wodak, 51–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sa’ar, Amalia. 2007. “Masculine Talk: On the Subconscious Use of Masculine Linguistic Forms among Hebrew- and Arabic-Speaking Women in Israel.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 32(2): 405–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, Ora. 2002. Studies in Hebrew Morphology. Tel Aviv: The Open University of Israel. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Shilo, Margalit. 2005. Princess or Prisoner? Jewish Women in Jerusalem 1840–1914. Waltham: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale. 1985. Man Made Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Jane. 2004. Gendered Discourses. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobin, Yishai, and Alison Stern-Perez. 2009. “Linguistic Sign Systems Indicating Proximity and Remoteness in the ‘Troubled Talk’ of Israeli Bus Drivers who Experienced Terror Attacks.” Israel Studies in Language and Society 2(2): 144–168.Google Scholar
Tobin, Yishai. 2001. “Gender Switch in Modern Hebrew.” In Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men vol. 1, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bussmann, 177–198. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Cohen-Achdut, Miri & Leon Shor
2024. “Does being pretty help?”. Journal of Language and Politics 23:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
O'Neill, Brittney
2021. He, (s)he/she, and they. Working papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York 1 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Guellouz, Mariem
2016. Gender marking and the feminine imaginary in Arabic. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Hadjidemetriou, Chryso
2016. When She and He become It. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Kumar Kashyap, Abhishek
2016. The representation of gender in Bajjika grammar and discourse. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Nelson, Jessica Fae
2016. Lakota men’s and women’s speech. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Weirich, Anna Christine
2016. “Moldovan” and feminist language politics. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.