Negative self-categorization, stance, affect, and affiliation in autobiographical storytelling
This study examines pejorative self-categorizations in troubles-tellings vis-à-vis the Hindi and English medium education of two Indian women within the institutional context of qualitative research interviews. Sequential conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis are combined to analyze how the interviewees manage emotional displays in relation to socio-linguistic identities and categories. Analysis reveals that while explicitly discriminatory categorizations with accompanying affect-implicative resources such as laughter tokens and prosodic variation are produced by the interviewees to reference themselves, this is done in the pursuit of recipient affiliation. Findings demonstrate that these Hindi-speaking interviewees orient to the same desire for recipient affiliation to their expressed emotional stances as has been found in monolingual and English troubles-tellings produced in interview and non-interview settings.
References
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2009 “
A Sequential Approach to Affect: The Case of ‘Disappointment’.” In
Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by
Markku Haakana,
Minna Laakso, and
Jan Lindström, 94–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012a “
Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In
Emotion in Interaction, ed. by
Anssi Peräkylä, and
Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012b “
Some Truths and Untruths about Final Intonation in Conversational Questions.” In
Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by
Jan P. de Ruiter, 123–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Du Bois, John W., and Elise Kärkkäinen
2012 “
Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction.”
Text & Talk 32 (4): 433–451.
Drew, Paul
1998 “
Complaints about Transgression and Misconduct.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 295–325.
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992 “
Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In
Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by
Paul Drew, and
John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin
2000 “
Emotion within Situated Activity.” In
Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by
Alessandro Duranti, 239–257. Oxford: Blackwell.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin
2012 “
Emotion as Stance.” In
Emotion in Interaction, ed. by
Anssi Peräkylä, and
Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haakana, Markku
2001 “
Laughter as a Patient’s Resource: Dealing with Delicate Aspects of Medical Interaction.”
Text & Talk 21: 187–220.
Haakana, Markku
2007 “
Reported Thought in Complaint Stories.” In
Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by
Elizabeth Holt, and
Rebecca Clift, 150–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John
2005 “
Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” In
Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by
Kristine L. Fitch, and
Robert E. Sanders, 103–147. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heritage, John
2011 “
Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In
The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by
Tanya Stivers,
Lorenza Mondada, and
Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John C., and D. Rod Watson
1979 “
Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In
Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by
George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Heritage, John C., and Rod D. Watson
1980 “
Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed.”
Semiotica 30 (3–4): 245–262.
Hester, Sally, and Stephen Hester
2012 “
Categorial Occasionality and Transformation: Analyzing Culture in Action.”
Human Studies 35: 563–581.
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
(eds.) 1997a Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
1997b “
Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction.” In
Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by
Stephen Hester, and
Peter Eglin, 1–23. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Holt, Elizabeth
1996 “
Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–245.
Holt, Elizabeth
2000 “
Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 425–454.
Jayyusi, Lena
1984 Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge.
Jefferson, Gail
1978 “
Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In
Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by
Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press.
Jefferson, Gail
1984a “
On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters.” In
Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by
J. Maxwell Atkinson, and
John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, Gail
1984b “
On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles.” In
Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by
J. Maxwell Atkinson, and
John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, Gail
1988 “
On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-talk in Ordinary Conversation.”
Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441.
Jefferson, Gail
2002 “
Is ‘No’ an Acknowledgment Token? Comparing American and British Uses of (+)/(−) Tokens.”
Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1345–1383.
Jefferson, Gail, and John R. E. Lee
1981 “
The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a “Troubles Telling”
and a “Service Encounter.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399–422.
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1987 “
Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In
Talk and Social Organization, ed. by
Graham Button, and
John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Jiwani, Yasmin, and John E. Richardson
2011 “
Discourse, Ethnicity and Racism.” In
Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by
Teun A. van Dijk, 241–262. London: SAGE.
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2012 “
Affiliation in Conversation.” In
The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by
Jack Sidnell, and
Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923/1989 “
The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In
The Meaning of Meaning, ed. by
C. A. Ogden and
I. A. Richards, 296–336. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Mandelbaum, Jenny
2012 “
Storytelling in Conversation.” In
The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by
Jack Sidnell, and
Tanya Stivers, 492–508. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2006 “
Facial expression in an Assessment.” In
Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods, ed. by
Hubert Knoblauch,
Bernt Schnettler,
Jürgen Raab, and
Hans-Georg Soeffner, 127–142. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2012 Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pomerantz, Anita
1986 “
Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.”
Human Studies 9: 219–229.
Prior, Matthew T
2016 Emotion and Discourse in L2 Interviews. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna
2012 “
Emotion, Affect and Conversation.” In
The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by
Jack Sidnell, and
Tanya Stivers, 330–349. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey
1974 “
An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” In
Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by
Richard Bauman, and
Joel Sherzer, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandhu, Priti
2010 “Enactments of Discursive Empowerment in Narratives of Medium of Education by North Indian Women.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Second Language Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
Sandhu, Priti
2014a “
The Interactional and Narrative Construction of Normative and Resistant Discourses about Hindi and English.”
Applied Linguistics 35 (1): 29–47.
Sandhu, Priti
2014b “‘Who Does She Think She Is?’ Vernacular Medium and Failed Romance.” Journal of Language
,
Identity, and Education 13 (1): 16–33.
Sandhu, Priti
2015 “
Stylizing Voices, Stances, and Identities Related to Medium of Education in India.”
Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 34 (2): 211–235.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol: I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “
Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell
2005 “
Introduction: Multimodal Interaction.”
Semiotica 156 (1–4): 1–20.
Tannen, Deborah
1989 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van der Valk, Ineke
2003 “
Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France.”
Discourse and Society 14 (3): 309–348.
Van Dijk, Teun A
1992 “
Discourse and the Denial of Racism.”
Discourse and Society 3 (1): 87–118.
Van Dijk, Teun A
1997 “
Political Discourse and Racism: Describing Others in Western Parliaments.” In
The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, ed. by
Stephen Harold Riggins, 31–64. London: SAGE.
Watson, D. Rod
1997 “
Some General Reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the Analysis of Conversation.” In
Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by
Stephen Hester, and
Peter Eglin, 49–76. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.