The paper adopts and modifies Austin’s (1962) notion of perlocutionary effects and argues for recognizing the significance of such effects in communication. I draw a parallel between persuasion, which has received much attention in RT and is believed to be intrinsically linked to comprehension, and other effects, such as amusement or taking offence. I hypothesise that the latter occur not merely as consequences of interpretations consisting in an explicature and a set of implicatures, but that they may also have some impact on the inferential path and ultimately on the outcome of the comprehension process. To support this view, I refer to selected psychological findings on the inseparability of cognition and affect in stimuli processing.
1956–1957 “A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 57: 1–30. Oxford: Blackwell on behalf of The Aristotelian Society.
Austin, John
1962/98 “How to Do Things with Words.” In Pragmatics. Critical concepts, Vol. 2, ed. by A. Kasher, 7–64. London: Routlege.
Barrett, Karen, and Joseph Campos
1987 “Perspectives on Emotional Development II: A Functionalist Approach to Emotions.” In Handbook of Infant Development, ed. by Joy D. Osofsky, 555–578. New York: Wiley.
Blakemore, Diane
1991 “Performatives and Parentheticals.” Proceedings of the
Aristotelian Society
91:197–213.
Blakemore, Diane
2011 “On the Descriptive Ineffability of Expressive Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3537–3550.
Clore, Gerald L
1992 “Cognitive Phenomenology: Feelings and the Construction of Judgment.” In The Construction of Social Judgment, ed. by Leonard. L. Martin and Abraham Tesser, 133–163. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clore, Gerald L., and Karen Gasper
2000 “Feeling is Believing: Some Affective Influences on Belief.” In Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts, ed. by Nico. H. Frijda, Antony S.R. Manstead, and Sandra Bem, 10–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clore, Gerald L., and W. Gerrod Parrott
1991 “Moods and Their Vicissitudes: Thoughts and Feelings as Information.” In Emotion and Social Judgment, ed. by Joseph P. Forgas, 107–123. Oxford: Pergamon.
Curcó, Carmen
1995 “Some Observations on the Pragmatics of Humorous Interpretations. A Relevance-theoretic Approach.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 27–47.
Curcó, Carmen
1996 “The Implicit Expression of Attitudes, Mutual Manifestness and Verbal Humour.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8 (1996): 89–99.
Curcó, Carmen
1997The Pragmatics of Humorous Interpretations: A Relevance-Theoretic Account. PhD diss., University College London.
Curcó, Carmen
1998 “Indirect Echoes and Verbal Humour.” In Current Issues in Relevance Theory, ed. by Villy Rouchota and Andreas Jucker, 305–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Damasio, Antonio R
1994Descartes’ Error. New York: Putnam.
Escandell Vidal, Maria V
1998 “Politeness: A Relevant Issue for Relevance Theory.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11: 45–57.
1994 “The Social Roles and Functions of Emotions.” In Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence, ed. by Shinobu Kitayama and Hazel Rose Markus, 51–87. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jodłowiec, Maria
1991 “What Makes Jokes Tick.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 241–253.
Jodłowiec, Maria
2008 “What’s in the Punchline?” In Relevant Worlds: Current Perspectives on Language, Translation and Relevance Theory, ed. by Ewa Wałaszewska, Marta Kisielewska-Krysiuk, Aniela Korzeniowska, and Małgorzata Grzegorzewska, 67–86. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lazarus, Richard. S
1991Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, Stephen. C
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mascaro, Olivier, and Dan Sperber
2009 “The Moral, Epistemic and Mindreading Components of Children’s Vigilance Towards Deception.” Cognition 112: 367–380.
. Johnson-Laird. “Towards a Cognitive Theory of Emotions.”Cognition and Emotion 1 (1987): 29–50.
Oatley, Keith, and Philip N. Johnson-Laird
1995 “The Communicative Theory of Emotions: Empirical Tests, Mental Models, and Implications for Social Interaction.” In Striving and Feeling: Interactions among Goals, Affect, and Self Regulation, ed. by Leonard. L. Martin and Abraham Tesser, 363–393. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Oatley, Keith, Dacher Keltner, and Jennifer M. Jenkins
2006Understanding Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2001 “The Relevance of What Seems Irrelevant: Remarks on the Relationship between Phatic Utterances and Sociopragmatic Failure.” Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada 2: 199–212.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2004 “On the Social Importance of Phatic Utterances: Some Considerations for a Relevance Theoretic Approach.” In Current Trends in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics, ed. by Pilar Garcés Conejos, Reyes Gómez Morón, Lucía Fernández Amaya, and Manuel Padilla Cruz, 199–216. Seville: Intercultural Pragmatics Research Group.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2007a “Metarepresentations and Phatic Utterances: A Pragmatic Proposal about the Generation of Solidarity between Interlocutors.” In Current Trends in Pragmatics, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Joanna Nijakowska, 110–128. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2007b “Phatic Utterances and the Communication of Social Information: A Relevance-theoretic Approach.” In Studies in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics, ed. by Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Manuel Padilla Cruz, Reyes Gómez Morón, and Lucía Fernández Amaya, 105–118. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2009a.“Towards an Alternative Relevance-theoretic Approach to Interjections.” International Review of Pragmatics 1 (1): 182–206.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2009b “Might Interjections Encode Concepts? More Questions than Answers.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (2): 241–270.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2010 “What do Interjections Contribute to Communication and How Are They Interpreted? A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach.” In Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics. Volume I: Speech Actions in Theory and Applied Studies, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 39–68. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2012 “Metarepresentation, Attitudinal Utterances and Attitude Combination: A Relevance-theoretic Approach.” In Relevance Studies in Poland. Vol. 4. Essays on Language and Communication, ed. by Agnieszka Piskorska, 75–88. Warsaw: WUW.
Pilkington, Adrian
2010 “Metaphor Comprehension: Some Questions for Current Accounts in Relevance Theory.” In Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, ed. by Esther Romero and Belén Soria, 156–171. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Piskorska, Agnieszka
2012 “Cognition and Emotions – Jointly Contributing to Positive Cognitive Effects?” In Relevance Studies in Poland. Vol. 4. Essays on Language and Communication, ed. by Agnieszka Piskorska, 102–111. Warsaw: WUW.
Sbisà, Marina
2009 “Uptake and Conventionality in Illocution.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1): 33–52.
Searle, John R
1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23.
Solska, Agnieszka
2012a “Relevance-theoretic Comprehension Procedure and Processing Multiple Meanings in Paradigmatic Puns.” In Relevance Theory. More than Understanding, ed. by E. Wałaszewska and A. Piskorska, 167–182. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Solska, Agnieszka
2012b “The Relevance-based Model of Context in Processing Puns.” Research in Language 10 (4): 387–404.
Sperber, Dan
1997 “Intuitive and Reflective Beliefs.” Mind and Language 12: 67–83.
Sperber, Dan
2005 “Modularity and Relevance: How Can a Massively Modular Mind Be Flexible and Context-sensitive?” In The Innate Mind: Structure and Content, ed. by Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen Stich, 53–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson
2010 “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language 25: 359–393.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
2002 “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mindreading.” Mind & Language 17: 3–23.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
2012 “Introduction: Pragmatics.” In Meaning and Relevance, 1–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taillard, Marie
2000 “Persuasive Communication: The Case of Marketing.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 145–172.
Unger, Christoph
2012 “Epistemic Vigilance and the Function of Procedural Indicators in Communication and Comprehension.” In Relevance Theory. More than Understanding, ed. by Ewa Wałaszewska, and Agnieszka Piskorska, 45–73. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2009The Pragmatics of Non-verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre
2005“New Directions for Research on Pragmatics and Modularity.” Lingua 115 (8): 1129–1146.
Wilson, Deirdre
2011a “The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present and Future.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface), ed. by Victoria Escandell Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 3–31. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Wilson, Deirdre
2011b “Understanding and Believing.” Lecture delivered at the
Relevance Round TableConference
, University of Warsaw, June 2011.
Wilson, Deirdre
2012 “Modality and the Conceptual-Procedural Distinction.” In Relevance theory. More than understanding, ed. by Ewa Wałaszewska and Agnieszka Piskorska, 23–43. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1988 “Mood and the Analysis of Non-declarative Sentences.” In Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value, ed. by Jonathan Dancy, J.M.E. Moravcsik, and C.C.W. Taylor, 77–101. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1993 “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 90: 1–25.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2004 “Relevance Theory.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Gregory Ward, and Laurence Horn, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2012Relevance and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Tim Wharton
2006 “Relevance and Prosody.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1559–1579.
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona
2013From Speech Acts to Speech Actions. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Yus, Francisco
2003 “Humor and the Search for Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9): 1295–1331.
2008 “A Relevance-theoretic Classification of Jokes.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1): 131–157.
Yus, Francisco
2012a “Strategies and Effects in Humorous Discourse. The Case of Jokes.” In Studies in Linguistics and Cognition, ed. by Barbara Eizaga Rebollar, 271–296. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Yus, Francisco
2012b “Relevance, Humour and Translation.” In Relevance Theory. More than Understanding, ed. by E. Wałaszewska and A. Piskorska, 117–145. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Yus, Francisco
2013a “Analyzing Jokes with the Intersecting Circles Model of Humorous Communication.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 9 (1): 3–24.
2023. Has madam read Wilson (2016)?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:3 ► pp. 486 ff.
Solska, Agnieszka
2023. The interpretative non-prototypicality of puns as a factor in the emergence of humor and in phatic communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Wharton, Tim
2021. Relevance. Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2 ► pp. 321 ff.
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona
2023. Speech Acts and Relevance: in Search of a Dialogue. Research in Language 21:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.