Cover not available
Part of
Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271] 2017
► pp. 171–192

Chapter 7
Potential vs Use

Revisiting an evidential participial construction in Lithuanian

 | Vilnius University
 | Vilnius University
The paper deals with the existing potential of the grammatical realizations of evidentiality (so-called “passive evidentials”) in Lithuanian, which has been described theoretically in literature; however there are no studies that would attest to the frequency and patterns of actual use of this construction in authentic contemporary Lithuanian. The analysis has been carried out in the light of the theoretical approach (Boye and Harder 2009; Boye 2012) and the template of the database of evidential markers in European languages (Wiemer and Stathi 2010). The study employs corpus based quantitative and qualitative methodology in order to investigate the distributional patterns of the -ma/-ta construction in different types of discourse. Though -ma/-ta participles are very frequent in contemporary Lithuanian, their use in the evidential construction is very rare.
Keywords: Lithuanian, corpus-based study, evidential construction, passive participles, existential
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Data and method
      • 1.1.1Data selection criteria
    • 1.2Indirect evidentiality – an epistemic qualification
  • 2.Results and discussion
  • 3.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • List of abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.08uso
References (33)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Information Source and Evidentiality: What Can We Conclude?” Italian Journal of Linguistics – Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1): 207–227.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1990. Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis pričastij baltijskih jazykov. (Comparative syntax of participles in Baltic languages). Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
. (ed.). 1996. Lietuvių kalbos gramatika. (Lithuanian Grammar). Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla.Google Scholar
. (ed.). 1997. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. “Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English News Discourse: A Text Driven Approach.” Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder. 2009. “Evidentiality: Linguistic Categories and Grammaticalization.” Functions of Language 16 (1): 9–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2001. “Some Discourse Functions of Existentials in English.” In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 1–6. <[URL]> (06 March 2015)
Cruse, D. Alan. 1973. “Some Thoughts on Agentivity.” Journal of Linguistics 9: 11–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma. 2006. “Passives in Lithuanian (in Comparison with Russian).” In Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, ed. by Abraham Werner, and Lariso Leisiö, 29–61. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gronemeyer, Claire. 1997. “Evidentiality in Lithuanian.” Working Papers, Lund University, 46: 93–112.
Holvoet, Axel. 2004. “Evidencialumo kategorija.” (“The Category of Evidentiality”). In Gramatinių kategorijų tyrimai, ed. by Axel Holvoet, and Loreta Semėnienė, 105–120. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.Google Scholar
. 2007. Mood and Modality in Baltic. Krakow: Wydawnictwo uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalėdaitė, Violeta. 2002. Existential Sentences in English and Lithuanian. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, and Bernard Wälchli. 2001. “The Circum-Baltic Languages: Areal- Typological Approach.” In The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact, vol. 2, ed. by Östen Dahl, and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, 615–750. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavine, E. James. 2006. “Is There a Passive Evidential Strategy in Lithuanian?” CLS 42: 41–56.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Mood and a Transitivity Restriction in Lithuanian: The Case of the Inferential Evidential.” Baltic Linguistics 1: 115–142.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia, and Seppo Kittilä. 2014. “The Typology and Diachrony of Partitives.” In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, ed. by Silvia Luraghi, and Tuomas Huumo, 17–62. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ørsnes, Bjarne. 2011. “Passives and Evidentiality: Danish Reportive Passives and their Equivalents in German.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 43 (1): 21–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruskan, Anna. 2012. “Evidential Adjectives in Lithuanian Academic Discourse.” Kalbotyra 64 (3): 103–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (this volume). “Markers of Evidentiality in Lithuanian Newspaper Discourse.”
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann, and Verner Egerland. 2009. “Impersonal Null-subjects in Icelandic and Elsewhere.” Studia Linguistica 63 (1): 158–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Usonienė, Aurelija. 2013. “On the Morphosyntactic Status of Complement-Taking Predicate Clauses in Lithuanian.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 45 (1): 73–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Non-morphological Realizations of Evidentiality: the Case of Parenthetical Elements in Lithuanian.” In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, ed. by Peter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet and Björn Wiemer, 437–464. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Usonienė, Aurelia, and Audrone Soliene 2012. “Choice of Strategies in Realizations of Epistemic Possibility in English and Lithuanian.” In Corpus Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, ed. by Stefania Marzo, Kris Heylen, and Gert De Sutter, 141–166. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2006. “Grammatical Evidentiality in Lithuanian (A typological assessment).” Baltistica 36: 33–49.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Hearsay in European languages: Toward an Integrative Account of Grammatical and Lexical Marking.” Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald, and Elena Smirnova, 59–129. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn, and Katerina Stathi. 2010. “The Database of Evidential Markers in European Languages. A Bird’s Eye View of the Conception of the Database (the Template and Problems Hidden Beneath it).” STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63(4): 275–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica
2019. Referential and pragmatic-discourse properties of Lithuanian reference impersonals: 2sg-imp, 3-imp and ma/ta-imp. Kalbotyra 72 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Usonienė, Aurelija & Nigel Vincent
2018. Non-finiteness, complementation and evidentiality. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197], ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Usonienė, Aurelija & Audronė Šolienė
2017. Reportive evidentials in English and Lithuanian. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.