Part of
Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271] 2017
► pp. 297313
References (21)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. “Evidentiality in Typological Perspective.” In Studies in Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, and Robert M. W. Dixon, 1–31. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, Paths of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006a. “Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English News Discourse: A Text-driven Approach.” Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar, Tense, Aspect and Modality in Languages of the World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2007. TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s-2000s. <[URL]>
. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present. <[URL]>
. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810-2009. <[URL]>
. 2011. Google Books Corpus. <[URL]>
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, and Gill Francis. 1998. “Verbs Observed: A Corpus Driven Pedagogic Grammar.” Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 45–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München: LINCOM.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk, and Johan van der Auwera. 2009. “Revisiting Be Supposed To from a Diachronic Constructionalist Perspective.” English Studies 90: 599–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1995. “Subjectification in Grammaticalization.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Bernd Heine. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s Semantic Map.” Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Linxiu. 2013. “Evaluative Functions of Reporting Evidentials in English Research Articles of Applied Linguistics.” Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3 (2): 119–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra. 2008. “Propositional Aspect and the Development of Modal Inferences in English.” In Modality-Aspect Interfaces: Implications and Typological Solutions, ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 43–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2024. Epistemological stance and passive reporting verbs in judicial opinions: the case of BE expected to and BE supposed to . Text & Talk 44:1  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.