This chapter argues for a dynamic perspective on discourse, delimiting discourse from context on the one hand, and from arbitrarily concatenated discourse units on the other. Addressing the question of granularity in an explicit manner, it argues for a relational conception of the constitutive parts of discourse, analogously to the functional-grammar-based differentiation between clausal and extra-clausal constituents. The former present propositional meaning contributing to local and not-so-local argument and storyline, and the latter encode procedural meaning, in particular metadiscursive linkages. A relational conception of discourse unit comprises ordinary discursive units, e.g. single and complex clauses and utterances, or speech acts, conversational contributions, but also larger units, e.g. paragraph / episode or opening, closing and topical sections, or speech act complexes. Metadiscursive units comprise prototypical extra-clausal constituents, e.g. comment clauses and discourse markers. The delimiting frame of discourse genre does not only constrain the structuring of discourse as regards the patterned linearization of discourse units, but also the degrees of implicitness/overtness for the linguistic realization of discourse units and the signalling of discourse relations and other coherence strands.
2003Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, John L
1976How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bach, Kent
1992 “Communicative Intentions, Plan Recognition, and Pragmatics: Comments on Thomason and Littman and Allen.” In Intentions in Communication, ed. by Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack, 389–400. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2006‘“Minister, We Will See How the Public Judges You’. Media References in Political Interviews.”Journal of Pragmatics 38: 180–195.
Fetzer, Anita
2007a “Context, Contexts and Appropriateness.” In Context and Appropriateness: Micro Meets Macro, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 3–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2013 “The Pragmatics of Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 11: 5–12.
Fetzer, Anita
2014 “Conceptualizing Discourse.” In Handbooks of Pragmatics. The Pragmatics of Discourse. Vol. 3, ed. by Klaus Schneider, and Anne Barron, 35–61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fetzer, Anita, and Augustin Speyer
2012 “Discourse Relations in English and German Discourse: Local and Not-So-Local Constraints.” Intercultural Pragmatics 9: 413–452.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. III, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Gumperz, John J
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, Michael A.K
1994Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael, A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan
1987Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Horn, Laurence R
1984 “Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-Based Implicature.” In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington: Washington University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C
1979 “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399.
Levinson, Stephen C
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C
1995 “Interactional Bias in Human Thinking.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 221–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Maier, Robert M., Carolin Hofmockel and Anita Fetzer
2016 “The Negotiation of Discourse Relations in Context: Co-Constructing Degrees of Overtness.” Intercultural Pragmatics.13(1): 71-105.
2006 “The Description of Text Relation Markers in the Geneva Model of Discourse Organization.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 115–132. Oxford: Elsevier.
Sbisà, Marina
2002a “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sbisà, Marina
2002b “Speech Acts in Context.” Language and Communication 22: 421–436.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.